Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2726-3537
Patient-Specific Computed Tomography-Based Three-Dimensional Spine Trauma Models for Preoperative Planning in Virtual Reality and 3D Printing: An EANS Young Neurosurgeons' Network Study
Authors
Funding Information None.
Abstract
Background and Study Objective
Lately, the wide availability of open-source modelling and rendering software in neurosurgery has led to the development of a methodological pipeline for creating patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) models based on preoperative imaging data. With recent innovations in virtual reality (VR) technology and 3D printing, these models can be applied to enhance preoperative planning and medical training. The main question this paper aims to answer is whether the proposed algorithm of intensity-based CT segmentation and basic 3D modelling is adequate to create a reference library of patient-specific models, categorized according to the AO Spine Injury Classification System, and suitable for VR and 3D printing-based preoperative planning.
Materials and Methods
We used the open-source medical image viewer Horos to create volumetric renderings of CT scans of trauma patients from several European centers. The models were postprocessed using 3D modelling software and exported in appropriate formats for VR or 3D printing.
Results
We created 37 models of trauma patients, spanning from the upper cervical to the thoracolumbar segment, categorized according to the AO Spine Injury Classification System. Additionally, a remote case discussion conducted by uploading these models into a collaborative VR environment was demonstrated as a proof of concept.
Conclusion
In the present study, we demonstrated that open-source software can create a database of patient-specific 3D models. Additionally, the communication between remote departments can be facilitated by uploading these models into a collaborative VR environment, and the comprehensive evaluation of spine fractures fostered through 3D printing. Further studies are needed to assess the database's educational value.
Publication History
Received: 23 May 2025
Accepted: 17 October 2025
Article published online:
29 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Fadero PE, Shah M. Three dimensional (3D) modelling and surgical planning in trauma and orthopaedics. Surgeon 2014; 12 (06) 328-333 . Accessed October 28, 2025 at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2014.03.008
- 2 Matthews F, Messmer P, Raikov V. et al. Patient-specific three-dimensional composite bone models for teaching and operation planning. J Digit Imaging 2009; 22 (05) 473-482
- 3 Raffa G, Spiriev T, Zoia C. et al. The use of advanced technology for preoperative planning in cranial surgery - A survey by the EANS Young Neurosurgeons Committee. Brain Spine 2023; 3: 102665
- 4 Stengel FC, Gandia-Gonzalez ML, Aldea CC. et al. Transformation of neurosurgical training from “see one, do one, teach one” to AR/VR & simulation - A survey by the EANS Young Neurosurgeons. Brain Spine 2022; 2: 100929
- 5 Meyer-Szary J, Luis MS, Mikulski S. et al. The role of 3D printing in planning complex medical procedures and training of medical professionals-cross-sectional multispecialty review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (06) 3331
- 6 Zoia C, Raffa G, Aldea CC. et al. The EANS Young Neurosurgeons Committee's vision of the future of European Neurosurgery. J Neurosurg Sci 2022; 66 (06) 473-475
- 7 Su Q, Zhang Y, Liao S. et al. 3D computed tomography mapping of thoracolumbar vertebrae fractures. Med Sci Monit 2019; 25: 2802-2810
- 8 Hwang Z, Abdalla M, Ajayi B, Bernard J, Bishop T, Lui DF. Thoracolumbar spine trauma: A guide for the FRCS examination. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2023; 33 (06) 2655-2661 . Accessed October 28, 2025 at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03430-9
- 9 Öztürk AM, Süer O, Govsa F, Özer MA, Akçalı Ö. Patient-specific three-dimensional printing spine model for surgical planning in AO spine type-C fracture posterior long-segment fixation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2022; 56 (02) 138-146
- 10 Ammanuel S, Brown I, Uribe J, Rehani B. Creating 3D models from radiologic images for virtual reality medical education modules. J Med Syst 2019; 43 (06) 166
- 11 Schnake KJ, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR, Oner C. AOSpine Classification Systems (Subaxial, Thoracolumbar). J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31 (Suppl. 04) S14-S23
- 12 Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK. et al; AOSpine Spinal Cord Injury & Trauma Knowledge Forum. AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine 2013; 38 (23) 2028-2037
- 13 Vezirska D, Milev M, Laleva L, Nakov V, Spiriev T. Three-dimensional printing in neurosurgery: A review of current indications and applications and a basic methodology for creating a three-dimensional printed model for the neurosurgical practice. Cureus 2022; 14 (12) e33153
- 14 Vaccaro AR, Karamian BA, Levy HA. et al. Update on upper cervical injury classifications: The New AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35 (06) 249-255
- 15 Stienen MN, Freyschlag CF, Schaller K, Meling T. EANS Young Neurosurgeons and EANS Training Committee. Procedures performed during neurosurgery residency in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162 (10) 2303-2311
- 16 Stienen MN, Netuka D, Demetriades AK. et al. Neurosurgical resident education in Europe–results of a multinational survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (01) 3-15
- 17 Stienen MN, Netuka D, Demetriades AK. et al. Working time of neurosurgical residents in Europe–results of a multinational survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (01) 17-25
- 18 Spiriev T, Nakov V, Cornelius JF. Photorealistic 3-dimensional models of the anatomy and neurosurgical approaches to the V2, V3, and V4 segments of the vertebral artery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 25 (01) e15-e21
- 19 Sciacca F. Agenesis of the corpus callosum – 3D reconstruction of Probst bundles. Radiopaedia Case; 2019.
- 20 Stengel FC, Bozinov O, Stienen MN. Transformation of practical exercise in neurosurgery depending on the level of training. Brain Spine 2022; 2: 101700
- 21 Petrone S, Cofano F, Nicolosi F. et al. Virtual-augmented reality and life-like neurosurgical simulator for training: First evaluation of a hands-on experience for residents. Front Surg 2022; 9: 862948
- 22 Clifton W, Damon A, Valero-Moreno F, Nottmeier E, Pichelmann M. The SpineBox: A freely available, open-access, 3d-printed simulator design for lumbar pedicle screw placement. Cureus 2020; 12 (04) e7738
- 23 Nicolosi F, Rossini Z, Zaed I, Kolias AG, Fornari M, Servadei F. Neurosurgical digital teaching in low-middle income countries: beyond the frontiers of traditional education. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 45 (04) E17
- 24 Pipolo DO, Luzzi S, Baldoncini M. et al. Virtual preoperative planning and 3D tumoral reconstruction with Horos open-source software. Surg Neurol Int 2023; 14: 32
- 25 Éltes PE, Kiss L, Bartos M. et al. Attitude of spine surgeons towards the application of 3D technologies - a survey of AOSpine members. Ideggyogy Sz 2019; 72 (7-8): 227-235
- 26 Hwang Z, Houston J, Fragakis EM. et al. Is the AO spine thoracolumbar injury classification system reliable and practical? A systematic review. Acta Orthop Belg 2021; 87 (01) 181-190
- 27 Vaccaro AR, Lambrechts MJ, Karamian BA. et al. AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system: A description and reliability study. Spine J 2022; 22 (12) 2042-2049
- 28 Izard SG, Juanes JA, García Peñalvo FJ, Estella JMG, Ledesma MJS, Ruisoto P. Virtual reality as an educational and training tool for medicine. J Med Syst 2018; 42 (03) 50
- 29 Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, Wainman B. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2013; 6 (04) 211-215
- 30 Brouwers L, Pull Ter Gunne AF, de Jongh MA. et al. What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020; 30 (01) 109-116
- 31 Bernardo A. Virtual reality and simulation in neurosurgical training. World Neurosurg 2017; 106: 1015-1029
- 32 Mishra R, Narayanan MDK, Umana GE, Montemurro N, Chaurasia B, Deora H. Virtual reality in neurosurgery: Beyond neurosurgical planning. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (03) 1719
- 33 Vayssiere P, Constanthin PE, Herbelin B, Blanke O, Schaller K, Bijlenga P. Application of virtual reality in neurosurgery: Patient missing. A systematic review. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 95: 55-62
- 34 Lemole Jr GM, Banerjee PP, Luciano C, Neckrysh S, Charbel FT. Virtual reality in neurosurgical education: part-task ventriculostomy simulation with dynamic visual and haptic feedback. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (01) 142-148 , discussion 148–149
- 35 McCloskey K, Turlip R, Ahmad HS, Ghenbot YG, Chauhan D, Yoon JW. Virtual and augmented reality in spine surgery: A systematic review. World Neurosurg 2023; 173: 96-107

