Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2702-4680
Original Research

Computed Tomography, Clinical Findings and Outcomes of Acute Anconeal Process Osteophyte Fractures and Fissures in Nine Dogs

Authors

  • Emma L. Deards

    1   Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Small Animal Teaching Hospital, Neston, Wirral, United Kingdom
  • Steve Bright

    2   Orthopaedics, Manchester Veterinary Specialists, Worsley, United Kingdom
  • Ben Keeley

    2   Orthopaedics, Manchester Veterinary Specialists, Worsley, United Kingdom
  • Rob Pettitt

    1   Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Small Animal Teaching Hospital, Neston, Wirral, United Kingdom
  • James Fraser McConnell

    1   Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Small Animal Teaching Hospital, Neston, Wirral, United Kingdom
Preview

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to describe the clinical features, computed tomography findings and treatment outcomes of anconeal process osteophyte fractures in dogs.

Methods

This was a retrospective case series. Dogs with osteoarthritis due to pre-existing elbow dysplasia or elbow fracture diagnoses, which were presented for acute/subacute elbow pain due to acute fracture of anconeal osteophytes. Diagnosis was based on computed tomographic findings. Information on the diagnostic imaging findings and treatment outcomes was documented.

Results

Nine dogs were diagnosed with anconeal process osteophyte fractures that were managed conservatively. Six of the dogs improved following conservative management and did not require surgical intervention.

Clinical Significance

Anconeal process osteophyte fractures have not been previously described in dogs. Recognition of and suitable diagnostic imaging selection for this condition can lead to prompt diagnosis and appropriate case management for these patients.

Contributions' Statement

E.L.D. conducted the majority of the research, prepared and assembled the manuscript and finalized formatting for submission. S.B. contributed to clinical cases, reviewed the manuscript and provided editorial input and suggestions. B.K. contributed to clinical cases, reviewed the manuscript and provided editorial input and suggestions. R.P. reviewed the manuscript and provided editorial suggestions J.F.M. conceived the idea for the manuscript, sourced and verified the clinical images and contributed to the manuscript editing and development.


Ethical Approval

This is a retrospective study, and no patients were directly impacted by its undertaking. The paper received ethical approval from the University of Liverpool (reference: VREC1375).


Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 25. Januar 2025

Angenommen: 15. September 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. Oktober 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany