3D-Printed Guide for Thumb Carpometacarpal Prosthesis in Low Bone Stock

Abstract

Background

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis is a common and limiting condition of the hand in the elderly population. This can often lead to Z-deformity and compromised grip strength. While prosthetic arthroplasty has improved treatment outcomes, patients with low bone stock still present technical challenges. Standard techniques may risk poor implant positioning, fracture, and loosening. This case report describes the use of a novel technique with the use of a patent-specific three-dimensional (3D)-printed guide to enhance surgical precision.

Case Description

A 77-year-old female with Eaton stage IV CMC arthritis presented with advanced trapezium collapse, adduction, and Z-deformity of her left thumb. Preoperative computed tomography scan revealed a severely compromised trapezium with a medium height of 7 mm. A custom 3D-printed polylactic acid guide was designed to optimize cup positioning for MAÏA prothesis implantation. Accurate guidewire placement was obtained through the use of the 3D-printed guide, reducing the risk of malposition. Postoperative imaging confirmed correct implant alignment without lucency at 12 weeks' postoperative.

Literature Review

In previous studies, the use of 3D-printed guides show reduced intraoperative time and errors. However, challenge remains on the widespread adoption of the method, due to increased cost and high production time outside the operating room.

Clinical Relevance

This case illustrates that 3D-printed patient-specific guides may enhance implant placement accuracy in CMC arthroplasty, particularly in patients with compromised bony anatomy. The guide facilitated safer reaming of the trapezium and optimized long-term implant stability. Despite concerns about cost, production time, and required technical expertise, such technology holds promise for select, high-risk cases.

Keywords

thumb - arthritis - arthroplasty - 3D-printing

Work developed at the Universidade Federal de Sergipe - HUL, Hand Division, Lagarto, Sergipe 49400, Brazil

Publication History

Received: 19 June 2025

Accepted: 15 September 2025

Article published online:
07 October 2025

• References

• 1 Young SD, Mikola E. Thumb carpometacarpal arthrosis. J Am Soc Surg Hand 2004; 4 (02) 73
• 2 Armbruster EJ, Tan V. Carpometacarpal joint disease: addressing the metacarpophalangeal joint deformity. Hand Clin 2008; 24 (03) 295-299 , vii
• 3 Villafañe JH, Valdés K, O'Brien V, Seves M, Cantero-Téllez R, Berjano P. Conservative management of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: an Italian survey of current clinical practice. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2018; 22 (01) 37-39
• 4 Moineau G, Richou J, Liot M, Le Nen D. Prognostic factors for the recovery of hand function following trapeziectomy with ligamentoplasty stabilisation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95 (05) 352-358
• 5 Degeorge B, Dagneaux L, Andrin J, Lazerges C, Coulet B, Chammas M. Do trapeziometacarpal prosthesis provide better metacarpophalangeal stability than trapeziectomy and ligamentoplasty?. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104 (07) 1095-1100
• 6 Chiche L, Chammas P-E, Vial D'Allais P, Lazerges C, Coulet B, Chammas M. Long-term survival analysis of 191 MAÏA prostheses for trapeziometacarpal arthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48 (02) 101-107
• 7 Seaourt A-C, Dap F, Dautel G, Athlani L. Comparison between the MAIA^® implant and trapeziectomy for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: outcomes at 9 years' follow-up. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2021; 26 (02) 158-165
• 8 Bricout M, Rezzouk J. Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia^® prosthesis: a series of 156 cases. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35 (03) 190-198
• 9 Fang C, Cai H, Kuong E. et al. Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing in the pelvis and acetabulum: from models and tools to implants. Unfallchirurg 2019; 122 (04) 278-285
• 10 Thayaparan GK, Owbridge MG, Thompson RG, D'Urso PS. Designing patient-specific solutions using biomodelling and 3D-printing for revision lumbar spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2019; 28 (Suppl. 02) 18-24
• 11 Wu C-T, Lu T-C, Chan C-S, Lin T-C. . Patient-specific 3D printing guide for single-stage skull bone tumor surgery: novel software workflow with manufacturing of pre-fabricated jigs for bone resection and reconstruction; 2021 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875020326395
• 12 Caiti G, Dobbe JGG, Strijkers GJ, Strackee SD, Streekstra GJ. Positioning error of custom 3D-printed surgical guides for the radius: influence of fitting location and guide design. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2018; 13 (04) 507-518
• 13 Duan XJ, Fan HQ, Wang FY, He P, Yang L. Application of 3D-printed customized guides in subtalar joint arthrodesis. Orthop Surg 2019; 11 (03) 405-413
• 14 Popescu D, Lăptoiu D, Marinescu R, Botezatu I. Design and 3D printing customized guides for orthopaedic surgery – lessons learned. Rapid Prototyping J 2018; 24 (05) 901
• 15 Holme TJ, Karbowiak M, Clements J, Sharma R, Craik J, Ellahee N. Thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2021; 6 (05) 316-330
• 16 Gómez-Garrido D, Triviño-Mayoral V, Delgado-Alcala V. et al. Five year long term results of total joint arthroplasties in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Acta Biomed 2019; 90 (04) 451-456
• 17 Oropallo W, Piegl LA. Ten challenges in 3D printing. Eng Comput 2015; 32 (01) 135
• 18 Wong KC. 3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics. Orthop Res Rev 2016; 8: 57-66
• 19 Langridge B, Momin S, Coumbe B, Woin E, Griffin M, Butler P. Systematic review of the use of 3-dimensional printing in surgical teaching and assessment. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (01) 209-221
• 20 Portnoy Y, Koren J, Khoury A. et al. Three-dimensional technologies in presurgical planning of bone surgeries: current evidence and future perspectives. Int J Surg 2023; 109 (01) 3-10