Scoping Review Protocol: Quality of Life in Children with Active Middle Ear Implants

Abstract

Active middle ear implants, particularly the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB), represent an established audiological treatment option for children with conductive, sensorineural, or mixed hearing loss when conventional hearing aids are insufficient or cannot be worn. In addition to functional improvements, the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is gaining increasing importance. While extensive data on quality of life exist for adults with cochlear implants, only a few methodologically heterogeneous studies have examined HRQoL in children with active middle ear implants. This protocol outlines the methodology for conducting a scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, aiming to identify, systematically collect, and analyze the international evidence. Empirical studies published since 2012 will be included without restrictions regarding study design or quality. The results aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the multidimensional aspects of quality of life in affected children and to serve as a foundation for future research as well as the development of needs-based clinical and educational interventions.

Keywords

Quality of Life - Children - Active Middle Ear Implants - Vibrant Soundbridge - Protocol Scoping Review

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 11. April 2025

Angenommen nach Revision: 10. September 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Oktober 2025

• Literatur

• 1 Bruchhage KL, Leichtle A, Schönweiler R. et al. Systematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy and economical outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274 (04) 1797-1806
• 2 Cremers CW, O’Connor AF, Helms J. et al. International consensus on Vibrant Soundbridge implantation in children and adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 74 (11) 1267 1269
• 3 Mandala M, Colletti L, Colletti V. Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2011; 32 (08) 1250-1255
• 4 Medical Advisory Secretariat. Bone anchored hearing aid: an evidence based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2002; 2: 1-47
• 5 Priwin C, Jönsson R, Hultcrantz M. et al. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 71: 135-145
• 6 Frenzel H, Schönweiler R, Hanke F. et al. The Lübeck flowchart for functional and aesthetic rehabilitation of aural atresia and microtia. Otol Neurotol 2012; 33: 1363-1367
• 7 Gleeson MJ, Clarke RC. Scott-Brown’s Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. Hrsg. 7. Aufl. New York: CRC Press; 2008
• 8 Osberger MJ, Geiger L, Zimmerman-Phillips S. et al. Use of a Parent-Report Scale to Assess Benefit in Children Given the Clarion Cochlear Implant. Am J Otol 1997; 18: 79-80
• 9 Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, van den Broek P. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123: 756-765
• 10 Maillet CJ, Thyler RS, Jordan HN. Change in the quality of life of adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 165: 31-48
• 11 Cuda D, Manrique M, Ramos Á. et al. Improving quality of life in the elderly: hearing loss treatment with cochlear implants. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24 (01) 16
• 12 Sousa AF, Couto MIV, Martinho-Carvalho AC. Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 84 (04) 494-499
• 13 Olsson MM, Lewis AT, Arvidsson L. et al. Health-Related Quality of Life and Work Satisfaction in Working-Aged Adults Pre- and Post-Cochlear Implant: A Longitudinal Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11 (23) 7024
• 14 Rostkowska J, Skarzynski PH, Kobosko J. et al. Health-related quality of life in adults with profound postlingual hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 278 (09) 3393-3399
• 15 Salamah M, Alradhi A, Alzhrani F. et al. Outcomes of Active Middle Ear Implants: Speech Perception and Quality of Life. J Pers Med 2024; 14 (08) 883
• 16 Lailach S, Zahnert T. Results and Quality of Life after Implantation of Active Middle Ear Implants. Laryngorhinootologie 2022; 101 (01) S3-S35
• 17 Muigg F, Zelger P, Rossi S. et al. Health-related quality of life in vibrant soundbridge patients: generic and specific measures, short-term and long-term outcomes. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281 (12) 6669-6675
• 18 Bruchhage KL, Lupatsii M, Möllenkolk F. et al. Hearing rehabilitation and microbial shift after middle ear surgery with Vibrant Soundbridge in patients with chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280 (07) 3107-3118
• 19 Gantner S, Epp A, Pollotzek M. et al. Long-term results and quality of life after Vibrant Soundbridge implantation (VSBs) in children and adults with aural atresia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281 (01) 129-139
• 20 Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C. et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2022; 22 (01) 143
• 21 Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P. et al. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2020 version)In:. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z. , Hrsg. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. (Hrsg).
• 22 The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL). In: . 1995: 1403
• 23 Walter U, Gerlich MG, Schwartz FW. Gesundheitsindikatoren. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung. 2020.
• 24 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W. et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation.