PDF herunterladen
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2697-4029
Original Article

Clinical and Radiological Analyses of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Involving One to Three Levels without Additional Plate Fixation: A Single-Center Experience

Autoren

  • Alexander Romagna 

    1   Department of Neurosurgery, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Munich, BY, Germany
    2   Department of Neurosurgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

  • Christoph Schwartz

    2   Department of Neurosurgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

  • Reuben Christopher

    1   Department of Neurosurgery, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Munich, BY, Germany

  • Martin Geroldinger

    3   Department of Research Program Biomedical Data Science, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

  • Dana Dinzenhofer-Kessler

    1   Department of Neurosurgery, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Munich, BY, Germany

  • David Schul

    4   Department of Neurosurgery, InnKlinikum gkU Altötting und Mühldorf, Altötting, BY, Germany

  • Andre Tomasino

    4   Department of Neurosurgery, InnKlinikum gkU Altötting und Mühldorf, Altötting, BY, Germany

Funding Information None.
Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) without additional anterior plate fixation.

Methods

A retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Odom's criteria. Radiological outcomes were evaluated based on changes in segmental disc height (subsidence), and Cobb angle by X-rays. Fusion was defined as a consistent distance between spinous processes.

Results

The study population consisted of 98 patients (mean age of 55.8 years) with a follow-up of 22.1 months. Procedures included 55 one-level, 33 two-level, and 10 three-level surgeries. The study results demonstrated good clinical outcomes, with statistically significant reductions in NDI scores with notable improvements in VAS (p < 0.001). Radiologically, we recorded a subsidence and reduction in Cobb angle of 1.6 mm/2.2 degrees in one-level, 3.8 mm/3.0 degrees in two-level, and 2.5 mm/2.4 degrees in three-level surgeries, respectively. Complete postoperative fusion was recorded for 86.7% patients, comprising rates of 87.3% for one-level, 90.9% for two-level, and 70.0% for three-level procedures. No revision surgery had to be performed.

Conclusion

ACDF without additional plating appears to be an effective procedure for the surgical treatment of single- and multilevel degenerative cervical disease with good clinical outcome.

Keywords

ACDF - cervical discectomy - Cobb angle - fusion - plating

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are not openly available due to reasons of sensitivity and are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Ethical Approval

The data were collected and analyzed as part of a doctoral thesis under the supervision of the manuscript's last author (A.T.), and the institutional review board (Technical University of Munich, Germany) approved the study protocol.


Informed Consent

All patients gave their written consent to the evaluation of the data, and were treated in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. April 2025

Angenommen: 05. September 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
09. September 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
21. November 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Epstein NE. A review of complication rates for anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF). Surg Neurol Int 2019; 10: 100
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Robertson SC, Ashley MR. Complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2023; 130: 169-178
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kaiser MG, Haid Jr RW, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts Jr GE. Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (02) 229-236 , discussion 236–238
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Samartzis D, Shen FH, Lyon C, Phillips M, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?. Spine J 2004; 4 (06) 636-643
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Lee H-C, Chen C-H, Wu C-Y, Guo J-H, Chen Y-S. Comparison of radiological outcomes and complications between single-level and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage-plate fusion system. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98 (05) e14277
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Chen C-M, Yang J-J, Wu C-C. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for two-level cervical disc degenerative disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13 (11) 3203
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Lofrese G, Trungu S, Scerrati A. et al. Two-level corpectomy and fusion vs. three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plating: long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a multicentric retrospective analysis. Life (Basel) 2023; 13 (07) 1564
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Pohl M, Back T, Leimert M. et al. Zervikale radikulopathie. Aktuelle Neurol 2018; 45: 349-369
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 1958; 15 (06) 602-617
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40-A (03) 607-624 . Accessed September 10, 2025 at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13539086/
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Hung M, Saltzman CL, Kendall R. et al. What are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI instruments among patients with spinal conditions?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (10) 2027-2036
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12 MacDowall A, Skeppholm M, Robinson Y, Olerud C. Validation of the visual analog scale in the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine 2018; 28 (03) 227-235
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Broekema AEH, Molenberg R, Kuijlen JMA, Groen RJM, Reneman MF, Soer R. The Odom criteria: Validated at last: A clinimetric evaluation in cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101 (14) 1301-1308
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 de Vries FE, Mesina-Estarrón I, Gerstl JVE, Mekary RA, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA. Assessing accuracy of measurement methods for bony fusion assessment after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine J 2024; 24 (11) 2035-2044
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Li YM, Huang Z, Towner J, Li YI, Riggleman JR, Ledonio C. Expandable technology improves clinical and radiographic outcomes of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease. Int J Spine Surg 2021; 15 (01) 87-93
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Tomasino A, Gebhard H, Parikh K, Wess C, Härtl R. Bioabsorbable instrumentation for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A radiological and clinical outcome study. J Neurosurg Spine 2009; 11 (05) 529-537
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hwang S-L, Lin C-L, Lieu A-S. et al. Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2004; 1 (02) 160-167
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Thomé C, Krauss JK, Zevgaridis D. A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurosurg Rev 2004; 27 (01) 34-41
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Adogwa O, Elsamadicy AA, Vuong VD. et al. Immediate postoperative pain scores predict neck pain profile up to 1 year following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Global Spine J 2018; 8 (03) 231-236
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine 2002; 27 (22) 2453-2458
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Jagannathan J, Shaffrey CI, Oskouian RJ. et al. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and allograft fusion without plate placement or cervical collar. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 8 (05) 420-428
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wewel JT, Kasliwal MK, Adogwa O, Deutsch H, O'Toole JE, Traynelis VC. Fusion rate following three- and four-level ACDF using allograft and segmental instrumentation: A radiographic study. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 62: 142-146
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Xie JC, Hurlbert RJ. Discectomy versus discectomy with fusion versus discectomy with fusion and instrumentation: A prospective randomized study. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (01) 107-116 , discussion 116–117
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Yue W-M, Brodner W, Highland TR. Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: A 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine 2005; 30 (19) 2138-2144
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Milczynska WM, Ahmad A, Ahmed AI. et al. Does titanium cage subsidence affect clinical outcomes in ACDF surgery? A tertiary centre experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2023; 105 (04) 378-383
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Obermueller T, Wagner A, Kogler L. et al. Radiographic measurements of cervical alignment, fusion and subsidence after ACDF surgery and their impact on clinical outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2020; 162 (01) 89-99
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Shiban E, Nies M, Kogler J. et al. No correlation between radiological and clinical outcome 1 year following cervical arthrodesis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2018; 160 (04) 845-853
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Samartzis D, Shen FH, Matthews DK, Yoon ST, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation. Spine J 2003; 3 (06) 451-459
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Carlson BC, Dawson JM, Beauchamp EC. et al. Choose wisely: Surgical selection of candidates for outpatient anterior cervical surgery based on early complications among inpatients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2022; 104 (20) 1830-1840
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L. Prediction of fusion and importance of radiological variables for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Eur Spine J 2004; 13 (03) 229-234
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 31 de Vries FE, Gül A, Mesina-Estarrón I, Mekary RA, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA. Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2025; 48 (01) 386
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Noordhoek I, Koning MT, Vleggeert-Lankamp CLA. Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: A systematic literature review. Eur Spine J 2019; 28 (02) 386-399
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Cabraja M, Oezdemir S, Koeppen D, Kroppenstedt S. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 172
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Pinter ZW, Monsef JB, Salmons HI. et al. Does preoperative bone mineral density impact fusion success in anterior cervical spine surgery? A prospective cohort study. World Neurosurg 2022; 164: e830-e834
    Suche in Google Scholar