Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26763957
DOI: 10.1055/a-2676-3957
Original article

Push enteroscopy and colonoscopy in melena patients with negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective multicenter study

1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
2   Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
,
Julajak Limsrivilai
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
2   Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
,
Chenchira Thongdee
3   Unit of Gastroenterology, Medicine Division, Medical Department, Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Mahidol University Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
,
Arunchai Chang
4   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN37700)
,
Kamonthip Sukonrut
5   Medicine, Ratchaburi Hospital, Ratchaburi, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN170147)
,
Onuma Sattayalertyanyong
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
2   Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
,
Manus Rugivarodom
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
2   Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
,
Uayporn Kaosombatwattana
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
2   Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
,
Nonthalee Pausawasdi
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
2   Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
,
Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
2   Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
,
Supot Pongprasobchai
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
2   Siriraj GI Endoscopy Center, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand (Ringgold ID: RIN65106)
› Institutsangaben

The authors express their gratitude to the Siriraj Research and Development Fund, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, for providing financial support for this study. Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): NCT06574542, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: Prospective
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims

Proper evaluation of patients with melena, no hematemesis, and nondiagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is poorly defined. Guidelines recommend colonoscopy, but the additional diagnostic yield is low. Owing to the high likelihood of proximal small bowel bleeding, push enteroscopy (PE) may be beneficial.

Patients and methods

We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study from four referral centers. Consecutive patients with melena, no hematemesis, and negative EGD results underwent PE followed by colonoscopy. For patients with culprit lesions found on PE and who were at risk of undergoing colonoscopy, colonoscopy was not performed and results were presumed to be negative. Diagnostic yields of both investigations were compared.

Results

Of 221 eligible patients who underwent EGD, 77 (34.8%) with nondiagnostic results were included in the analyses. Mean age of participants was 67.8 years and 51.9% were men. Culprit lesions were identified on PE in 27 of 77 patients (35.0%). Colonoscopy was performed in 59 patients and the source of bleeding was found in 10 patients (12.9%). Diagnostic yield of PE was significantly greater than that of colonoscopy (P = 0.005). Combining PE and colonoscopy increased diagnostic yield to 48%, which was significantly greater than the yields of PE (P = 0.002) or colonoscopy (P < 0.0001) alone.

Conclusions

PE is beneficial for patients with melena and nondiagnostic EGD. It should be considered before or in combination with colonoscopy for these patients.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 08. Januar 2025

Angenommen nach Revision: 31. Juli 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
04. August 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. August 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Kotchakon Maipang, Julajak Limsrivilai, Chenchira Thongdee, Arunchai Chang, Kamonthip Sukonrut, Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Manus Rugivarodom, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya, Supot Pongprasobchai. Push enteroscopy and colonoscopy in melena patients with negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26763957.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2676-3957
 
  • References

  • 1 Zhu CN, Friedland J, Yan B. et al. Presence of melena in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding predicts bleeding in the proximal small intestine. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63: 1280-1285
  • 2 Luke RG, Lees W, Rudick J. Appearances of the stools after the introduction of blood into the caecum. Gut 1964; 5: 77-79
  • 3 Etzel JP, Williams JL, Jiang Z. et al. Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy to evaluate melena after a nondiagnostic EGD. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 819-826
  • 4 Gerson LB, Fidler JL, Cave DR. et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and management of small bowel bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1265-1287
  • 5 Gurudu SR, Bruining DH. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of suspected small-bowel bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 22-31
  • 6 Ibach MB, Grier JF, Goldman DE. et al. Diagnostic considerations in evaluation of patients presenting with melena and nondiagnostic esophago-gastroduodenoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 1459-1462
  • 7 Tedesco FJ, Pickens CA, Griffin Jr JW. et al. Role of colonoscopy in patients with unexplained melena: analysis of 53 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27: 221-223
  • 8 Alemayehu G, Järnerot GJ. Same-day upper and lower endoscopy in patients with occult bleeding, melena, hematochezia, and/or microcytic anemia: A retrospective study of 224 patients. Scand J Gastroenterology 1993; 28: 667-672
  • 9 Lepere C, Van Gossum A, Bezet A. et al. Predictive factors of positive findings in patients explored by push enteroscopy for unexplained GI bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2005; 61: 709-714
  • 10 Ibach MB, Grier JF, Goldman DE. et al. Diagnostic considerations in evaluation of patients presenting with melena and nondiagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 1459-1462
  • 11 Tedesco FJ, Pickens CA, Griffin JW. et al. Role of colonoscopy in patients with unexplained melena: analysis of 53 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27: 221-223
  • 12 Clarke JO, Giday SA, Magno P. et al. How good is capsule endoscopy for detection of periampullary lesions? Results of a tertiary-referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 267-272
  • 13 Kong H, Kim YS, Hyun JJ. et al. Limited ability of capsule endoscopy to detect normally positioned duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 538-541
  • 14 Plotkin E, Imaeda A. Small intestinal angioectasias are not randomly distributed in the small bowel and most may be reached by push enteroscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 50: 561-565
  • 15 Mylonaki M, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 2003; 52: 1122-1126
  • 16 Mata A, Bordas JM, Feu F. et al. Wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a comparative study with push enteroscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 189-194
  • 17 Ell C, Remke S, May A. et al. The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 685-689
  • 18 Segarajasingam DS, Hanley SC, Barkun AN. et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes of video capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 29: 85-90
  • 19 Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB. et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 903-924
  • 20 Argyropoulos SK, Mahmood SK, Campbell EJ. et al. Improving the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopies. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63: 338-344
  • 21 Mussetto A, Arena R, Fuccio L. et al. A new panenteric capsule endoscopy-based strategy in patients with melena and a negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective feasibility study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33: 686-690
  • 22 Teshima CW, Kuipers EJ, van Zanten SV. et al. Double balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: an updated meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 796-801
  • 23 Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI. et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2407-2418
  • 24 Uchida G, Nakamura M, Yamamura T. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of small bowel endoscopy in patients with overt small bowel bleeding. Dig Endosc 2021; 33: 66-82
  • 25 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M. et al. Prospective comparison of push enteroscopy and push-and-pull enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2016-2024
  • 26 Chettiar R, Selby WS, Kaffes AJ. Antegrade double balloon enteroscopy for continued obscure gastrointestinal bleeding following push enteroscopy: Is there a role?. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 1381-1384
  • 27 Möschler O, May A, Müller MK. et al. Complications in and performance of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE): results from a large prospective DBE database in Germany. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 484-489
  • 28 Gerson LB, Tokar J, Chiorean M. et al. Complications associated with double balloon enteroscopy at nine US centers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 1177-1182
  • 29 Niikura R, Nagata N, Yamada A. et al. Efficacy and safety of early vs elective colonoscopy for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 168-75 e6
  • 30 van Rongen I, Thomassen BJW, Perk LE. Early versus standard colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: results of the BLEED Ssudy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2019; 53: 591-598