RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2676-3957
Push enteroscopy and colonoscopy in melena patients with negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective multicenter study
The authors express their gratitude to the Siriraj Research and Development Fund, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, for providing financial support for this study. Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): NCT06574542, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: Prospective

Abstract
Background and study aims
Proper evaluation of patients with melena, no hematemesis, and nondiagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is poorly defined. Guidelines recommend colonoscopy, but the additional diagnostic yield is low. Owing to the high likelihood of proximal small bowel bleeding, push enteroscopy (PE) may be beneficial.
Patients and methods
We conducted a prospective, multicenter cohort study from four referral centers. Consecutive patients with melena, no hematemesis, and negative EGD results underwent PE followed by colonoscopy. For patients with culprit lesions found on PE and who were at risk of undergoing colonoscopy, colonoscopy was not performed and results were presumed to be negative. Diagnostic yields of both investigations were compared.
Results
Of 221 eligible patients who underwent EGD, 77 (34.8%) with nondiagnostic results were included in the analyses. Mean age of participants was 67.8 years and 51.9% were men. Culprit lesions were identified on PE in 27 of 77 patients (35.0%). Colonoscopy was performed in 59 patients and the source of bleeding was found in 10 patients (12.9%). Diagnostic yield of PE was significantly greater than that of colonoscopy (P = 0.005). Combining PE and colonoscopy increased diagnostic yield to 48%, which was significantly greater than the yields of PE (P = 0.002) or colonoscopy (P < 0.0001) alone.
Conclusions
PE is beneficial for patients with melena and nondiagnostic EGD. It should be considered before or in combination with colonoscopy for these patients.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 08. Januar 2025
Angenommen nach Revision: 31. Juli 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
04. August 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
26. August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Kotchakon Maipang, Julajak Limsrivilai, Chenchira Thongdee, Arunchai Chang, Kamonthip Sukonrut, Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Manus Rugivarodom, Uayporn Kaosombatwattana, Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Phunchai Charatcharoenwitthaya, Supot Pongprasobchai. Push enteroscopy and colonoscopy in melena patients with negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26763957.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2676-3957
-
References
- 1
Zhu CN,
Friedland J,
Yan B.
et al.
Presence of melena in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding predicts bleeding in the proximal
small intestine. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63: 1280-1285
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Luke RG,
Lees W,
Rudick J.
Appearances of the stools after the introduction of blood into the caecum. Gut 1964;
5: 77-79
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Etzel JP,
Williams JL,
Jiang Z.
et al.
Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy to evaluate melena after a nondiagnostic EGD. Gastrointest
Endosc 2012; 75: 819-826
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Gerson LB,
Fidler JL,
Cave DR.
et al.
ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and management of small bowel bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol
2015; 110: 1265-1287
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Gurudu SR,
Bruining DH.
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee.
et al.
The role of endoscopy in the management of suspected small-bowel bleeding. Gastrointest
Endosc 2017; 85: 22-31
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Ibach MB,
Grier JF,
Goldman DE.
et al.
Diagnostic considerations in evaluation of patients presenting with melena and nondiagnostic
esophago-gastroduodenoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 1459-1462
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Tedesco FJ,
Pickens CA,
Griffin Jr JW.
et al.
Role of colonoscopy in patients with unexplained melena: analysis of 53 patients.
Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27: 221-223
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Alemayehu G,
Järnerot GJ.
Same-day upper and lower endoscopy in patients with occult bleeding, melena, hematochezia,
and/or microcytic anemia: A retrospective study of 224 patients. Scand J Gastroenterology
1993; 28: 667-672
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Lepere C,
Van Gossum A,
Bezet A.
et al.
Predictive factors of positive findings in patients explored by push enteroscopy for
unexplained GI bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2005; 61: 709-714
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Ibach MB,
Grier JF,
Goldman DE.
et al.
Diagnostic considerations in evaluation of patients presenting with melena and nondiagnostic
esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 1995; 40: 1459-1462
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Tedesco FJ,
Pickens CA,
Griffin JW.
et al.
Role of colonoscopy in patients with unexplained melena: analysis of 53 patients.
Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27: 221-223
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Clarke JO,
Giday SA,
Magno P.
et al.
How good is capsule endoscopy for detection of periampullary lesions? Results of a
tertiary-referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 267-272
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Kong H,
Kim YS,
Hyun JJ.
et al.
Limited ability of capsule endoscopy to detect normally positioned duodenal papilla.
Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 538-541
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Plotkin E,
Imaeda A.
Small intestinal angioectasias are not randomly distributed in the small bowel and
most may be reached by push enteroscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 50: 561-565
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Mylonaki M,
Fritscher-Ravens A,
Swain P.
Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy
and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding. Gut 2003; 52: 1122-1126
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Mata A,
Bordas JM,
Feu F.
et al.
Wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a comparative
study with push enteroscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 20: 189-194
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Ell C,
Remke S,
May A.
et al.
The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push
enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 685-689
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Segarajasingam DS,
Hanley SC,
Barkun AN.
et al.
Randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes of video capsule endoscopy with push
enteroscopy in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;
29: 85-90
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Johnson DA,
Barkun AN,
Cohen LB.
et al.
Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US
multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2014; 147: 903-924
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Argyropoulos SK,
Mahmood SK,
Campbell EJ.
et al.
Improving the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopies. Dig Dis Sci
2018; 63: 338-344
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Mussetto A,
Arena R,
Fuccio L.
et al.
A new panenteric capsule endoscopy-based strategy in patients with melena and a negative
upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective feasibility study. Eur J Gastroenterol
Hepatol 2021; 33: 686-690
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Teshima CW,
Kuipers EJ,
van Zanten SV.
et al.
Double balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding:
an updated meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 796-801
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Triester SL,
Leighton JA,
Leontiadis GI.
et al.
A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities
in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100:
2407-2418
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Uchida G,
Nakamura M,
Yamamura T.
et al.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of small
bowel endoscopy in patients with overt small bowel bleeding. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:
66-82
MissingFormLabel
- 25
May A,
Nachbar L,
Schneider M.
et al.
Prospective comparison of push enteroscopy and push-and-pull enteroscopy in patients
with suspected small-bowel bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2016-2024
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Chettiar R,
Selby WS,
Kaffes AJ.
Antegrade double balloon enteroscopy for continued obscure gastrointestinal bleeding
following push enteroscopy: Is there a role?. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 1381-1384
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Möschler O,
May A,
Müller MK.
et al.
Complications in and performance of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE): results from
a large prospective DBE database in Germany. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 484-489
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Gerson LB,
Tokar J,
Chiorean M.
et al.
Complications associated with double balloon enteroscopy at nine US centers. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 1177-1182
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Niikura R,
Nagata N,
Yamada A.
et al.
Efficacy and safety of early vs elective colonoscopy for acute lower gastrointestinal
bleeding. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 168-75 e6
MissingFormLabel
- 30
van Rongen I,
Thomassen BJW,
Perk LE.
Early versus standard colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial in patients with
acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: results of the BLEED Ssudy. J Clin Gastroenterol
2019; 53: 591-598
MissingFormLabel