Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Rofo
DOI: 10.1055/a-2667-6955
The Interesting Case

Silent Danger: Retroperitoneal Air as a Radiological Red Flag

Stille Gefahr: Retroperitoneale Luft als radiologischer Warnhinweis
Jakob Posch
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN31475)
,
Lucia Maria Winkler
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN31475)
,
Christos Vlachos
2   Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN31475)
,
Michael H Fuchsjäger
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN31475)
,
1   Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria (Ringgold ID: RIN31475)
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Introduction

Free retroperitoneal air due to perforation of the descending colon is a rare but life-threatening clinical entity. While colonic perforations are commonly associated with diverticulitis, malignancy, or fecal impaction, their isolated retroperitoneal manifestation is distinctly uncommon and sparsely documented in the literature. The descending colon, due to its secondary retroperitoneal anatomical location, may perforate without causing classical peritoneal signs, often delaying clinical recognition and surgical intervention [1]. Affected patients frequently present with nonspecific symptoms such as mild abdominal discomfort, subcutaneous emphysema, or even mediastinal air – findings that may only be revealed through advanced imaging [2]. Due to the subtle clinical presentation, diagnosis is challenging and often relies on repeat cross-sectional imaging. Computed tomography (CT) remains the gold standard modality, allowing for detection of retroperitoneal free air and associated findings like localized fat stranding or bowel wall thickening. Although the exact incidence of retroperitoneal colon perforation is unknown, it is considered exceptionally rare, with only isolated case reports described to date [3]. The overall mortality for colonic perforation is reported to be up to 17%, and delayed diagnosis in retroperitoneal cases may further worsen outcomes. This case highlights the importance of considering gastrointestinal perforation in elderly patients with atypical presentation and emphasizes the critical diagnostic role of CT, especially if clinical suspicion persists.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 30. April 2025

Angenommen nach Revision: 23. Juli 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. August 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany