Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26551439
DOI: 10.1055/a-2655-1439
Original article

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Shao-Bin Luo
1   Endoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
2   Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
,
Zu-Qiang Liu
1   Endoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
2   Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
,
Li Wang
1   Endoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
2   Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
,
Yi-Qun Zhang
1   Endoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
2   Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
,
Ming-Yan Cai
1   Endoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
2   Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
,
Quan-Lin Li
1   Endoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
2   Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
,
Ping-Hong Zhou
1   Endoscopy Center and Edoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
2   Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Shanghai, 200032, China (Ringgold ID: RIN92323)
› Author Affiliations

Supported by: The National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170555, 82270569, 82000507
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims

Endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is still considered a great challenge with a high risk of complications. This study aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal GIST.

Patients and methods

Between June 2013 and August 2024, we performed a retrospective study of patients with duodenal GISTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital. Data on patient characteristics, clinical outcome, and follow-up were collected.

Results

A total of 73 patients with duodenal GISTs were enrolled, including 31 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and 42 who underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). Mean lesion size was 1.2 ± 0.5 cm and 1.9 ± 0.9 cm, respectively. En bloc resection rates were 96.8% and 95.2%, respectively. Rates of R0 resection were 45.2% and 42.9%, respectively. Rates of R1 resection were 54.8% and 57.1%, respectively. No patient transferred to open surgery. Postoperative adverse events included delayed bleeding (1 case), delayed perforation (1 case), delayed wall edema (2 cases), hydrothorax (1 case), and retroperitoneal infection (1 case). Mean hospital stays were 4.1 ± 2.8 days and 6.2 ± 4.9 days, respectively. No metastasis or duodenal stenosis were detected during the follow-up period (64.8 ± 43.6 months and 61.3 ± 40.2 months, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in one patient with high recurrence risk at 56 months after EFTR.

Conclusions

ESD and EFTR are safe, minimally invasive treatments for duodenal GISTs. Moreover, the EFTR technique may have advantages of completely resecting lesions originating from the deep muscularis propria layer, particularly lesions with extraluminal growth.



Publication History

Received: 24 March 2025

Accepted after revision: 15 June 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
14 July 2025

Article published online:
07 August 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Shao-Bin Luo, Zu-Qiang Liu, Li Wang, Yi-Qun Zhang, Ming-Yan Cai, Quan-Lin Li, Ping-Hong Zhou. Feasibility and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26551439.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2655-1439
 
  • References

  • 1 Badalamenti G, Rodolico V, Fulfaro F. et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): focus on histopathological diagnosis and biomolecular features. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: vi136-140
  • 2 Blay JY, Kang YK, Nishida T. et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2021; 7: 22
  • 3 Charville GW, Longacre TA. Surgical pathology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: practical implications of morphologic and molecular heterogeneity for precision medicine. Adv Anat Pathol 2017; 24: 336-353
  • 4 Cioffi A, Maki RG. GI stromal tumors: 15 years of lessons from a rare cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 1849-1854
  • 5 Gupta S, Gauci J, O'Sullivan T. et al. A subepithelial lesion algorithm for endoscopic (SAFE) resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy 2025; 57: 95-106
  • 6 Andrisani G, Hassan C, Pizzicannella M. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for challenging colorectal lesions: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 987-997 e981
  • 7 Yan H, Liu X, Yin L. et al. Effects of endoscopic therapy and surgical resection on long-term survival outcomes in patients with duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end result program analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 8030-8038
  • 8 Nishida T, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S. et al. Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Dig Endosc 2013; 25: 479-489
  • 9 Nishida T, Goto O, Raut CP. et al. Diagnostic and treatment strategy for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer 2016; 122: 3110-3118
  • 10 Wiech T, Walch A, Werner M. Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 630-634
  • 11 Dalenbäck J, Havel G. Local endoscopic removal of duodenal carcinoid tumors. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 651-655
  • 12 Wu L, Liu M, Lin X. et al. Feasibility and efficacy of minimally invasive limited resection for primary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Surg 2024; 24: 126
  • 13 Popivanov G, Tabakov M, Mantese G. et al. Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the duodenum: a literature review. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3: 71
  • 14 Wang ZZ, Yan XD, Yang HD. et al. Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A single center analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14: 684-693
  • 15 Cavallaro G, Polistena A, D'Ermo G. et al. Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on clinical and surgical aspects. Int J Surg 2012; 10: 463-465
  • 16 Bauder M, Schmidt A, Caca K. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of duodenal lesions-a retrospective analysis of 20 FTRD cases. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6: 1015-1021
  • 17 Joo MK, Park JJ, Kim H. et al. Endoscopic versus surgical resection of GI stromal tumors in the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 318-326
  • 18 Farag S, Smith MJ, Fotiadis N. et al. Revolutions in treatment options in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs): the latest updates. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 21: 55
  • 19 Gao PT, Lin SL, Fu PY. et al. Endoscopic resection and suturing methods for non-ampullary duodenal submucosal tumors: "mini-invasive" treatments that should never be underestimated. Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 6135-6144
  • 20 Gaspar JP, Stelow EB, Wang AY. Approach to the endoscopic resection of duodenal lesions. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 600-617
  • 21 Zwager LW, Mueller J, Stritzke B. et al. Adverse events of endoscopic full-thickness resection: results from the German and Dutch nationwide colorectal FTRD registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 780-789 e784
  • 22 Crown A, Biehl TR, Rocha FG. Local resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Surg 2016; 211: 867-870
  • 23 Mueller J, Kuellmer A, Schiemer M. et al. Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection with the full-thickness resection device. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: 232-242
  • 24 Marano L, Boccardi V, Marrelli D. et al. Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: From clinicopathological features to surgical outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41: 814-822
  • 25 Du H, Ning L, Li S. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2020; 11: e00156
  • 26 Shichijo S, Uedo N, Sawada A. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors: Japanese multicenter prospective study. Dig Endosc 2024; 36: 811-821
  • 27 Dematteo RP, Gold JS, Saran L. et al. Tumor mitotic rate, size, and location independently predict recurrence after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Cancer 2008; 112: 608-615
  • 28 Singer S, Rubin BP, Lux ML. et al. Prognostic value of KIT mutation type, mitotic activity, and histologic subtype in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 3898-3905
  • 29 Shi Y, Hou YY, Lu SH. et al. Clinical and pathological studies of borderline gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010; 123: 2514-2520
  • 30 Lee SY, Goh BK, Sadot E. et al. Surgical strategy and outcomes in duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24: 202-210
  • 31 Du C, He Z, Li L. et al. Endoscopic resection for the treatment of non-gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2023; 47: 102152