Characterization of biomechanical risk factors during endoscopic submucosal dissection: Ergonomic pilot study

Abstract

Background and study aims

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are prevalent among endoscopists. The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanical risk factors for MSDs in gastroenterologists performing ESD.

Methods

An observational study was performed among interventional endoscopists performing ESD in three French centers. Physical constraints were assessed using an analog scale of perceived physical effort intensity and physiological sensors to measure joint angulation kinematics and muscle activity levels (flexor and extensor carpi radialis muscles) during diagnostic colonoscopy and ESD. High muscle strain was defined as any muscle activation exceeding 10% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Two distinct sub-tasks of ESD were identified: lesion marking and circumferential incision phase (ESD-1) and dissection phase (ESD-2).

Results

Six interventional gastroenterologists participated in the study. Perceived physical effort was significantly greater for ESD compared with colonoscopy (P = 0.03). Time spent at more than 10% MVC for the right extensor carpi radialis was significantly higher during ESD-1 than during colonoscopy (+15%, P = 0.04). The greatest strain was observed in the left extensor carpi radialis. This muscle was particularly exposed because more than 50% of the time was spent at more than 10% of MVC during colonoscopy and up to more than 80% during ESD-1 and -2. Time spent in the neck flexion risk zone was significantly higher during ESD-2 than during colonoscopy (+42%, P = 0.046).

Conclusions

ESD increased the risk of musculoskeletal strain. It is crucial to develop prevention programs to reduce risk of MSD in the population of gastroenterologists.

Keywords

Quality and logistical aspects - Training - Quality management - Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Endoscopic resection (polypectomy, ESD, EMRc, ...)

• References

• 1 Sturm N, Leukert J, Perkhofer L. et al. The impact of endoscopic activity on musculoskeletal disorders of high-volume endoscopists in Germany. Scientific Reports 2022; 12: 8538
• 2 Shah SZ, Rehman ST, Khan A. et al. Ergonomics of gastrointestinal endoscopies: Musculoskeletal injury among endoscopy physicians, nurses, and technicians. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14: 142-152
• 3 Austin K, Schoenberger H, Sesto M. et al. Musculoskeletal injuries are commonly reported among gastroenterology trainees: Results of a national survey. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 1439-47
• 4 Hansel SL, Crowell MD, Pardi DS. et al. Prevalence and Impact of musculoskeletal injury among endoscopists: A controlled pilot study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 399-404
• 5 Kuwabara T. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal pain in Japanese gastrointestinal endoscopists: A controlled study. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 1488-1493
• 6 Byun YH, Lee JH, Park MK. et al. Procedure-related musculoskeletal symptoms in gastrointestinal endoscopists in Korea. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 4359
• 7 Buschbacher R. Overuse syndromes among endoscopists. Endoscopy 1994; 26: 539-544
• 8 Liberman AS, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Injuries sustained by colorectal surgeons performing colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1606-1609
• 9 Ridtitid W, Coté GA, Leung W. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries related to endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 294-302.e4
• 10 Keate RF, Dryden GW, Wang K. et al. Occupational injuries to endoscopists: Report from the ASGE web survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: AB111
• 11 Miller AT, Herberts MB, Hansel SL. et al. Procedural and anthropometric factors associated with musculoskeletal injuries among gastroenterology endoscopists. Appl Ergon 2022; 104: 103805
• 12 Shergill AK, McQuaid KR, Rempel D. Ergonomics and GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 145-153
• 13 Battevi N, Menoni O, Cosentino F. et al. Digestive endoscopy and risk of upper limb biomechanical overload. Med Lav 2009; 100: 171-177
• 14 Alfarone L, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T. et al. Impact of annual case volume on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes in a large prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2025; 120: 370-378
• 15 Jacques J, Schaefer M, Wallenhorst T. et al. Endoscopic en bloc versus piecemeal resection of large nonpedunculated colonic adenomas: A randomized comparative trial. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177: 29-38
• 16 Barret M, Lepilliez V, Coumaros D. et al. The expansion of endoscopic submucosal dissection in France: A prospective nationwide survey. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: 45-53
• 17 Fleischmann C, Probst A, Ebigbo A. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in europe: results of 1000 neoplastic lesions from the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry. Gastroenterology 2021; 161: 1168-1178
• 18 Khan R, Faggen A, Shergill A. et al. Integrating ergonomics into endoscopy training: A guide for faculty and fellows. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 868-872
• 19 Pawa S, Kwon RS, Fishman DS. et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of ergonomics for prevention of endoscopy-related injury: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 482-491
• 20 Shergill AK, Rempel D, Barr A. et al. Biomechanical risk factors associated with distal upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders in endoscopists performing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 704-711
• 21 Borg G. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Iinetics 1998; ISBN 13 : 9780880116237.
• 22 Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. et al. Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain. In: Muscles: testing and function with posture and pain. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005
• 23 Yung M, Dale AM, Kapellusch J. et al. Modeling the effect of the 2018 revised ACGIH Hand Activity Threshold Limit Value (TLV) at reducing risk for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Occup Environ Hyg 2019; 16: 628-633
• 24 Szeto GPY, Cheng SWK, Poon JTC. et al. Surgeons’ Static posture and movement repetitions in open and laparoscopic surgery. J Surg Res 2012; 172: 19-31
• 25 Yu D, Green C, Kasten SJ. et al. Effect of alternative video displays on postures, perceived effort, and performance during microsurgery skill tasks. Appl Ergon 2016; 53: 281-289
• 26 McAtamney L, Nigel Corlett E. RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 1993; 24: 91-99
• 27 Maurer-Grubinger C, Holzgreve F, Fraeulin L. et al. Combining Ergonomic Risk Assessment (RULA) with inertial motion capture technology in dentistry—Using the benefits from two worlds. Sensors 2021; 21: 4077
• 28 Delleman NJ, Dul J. International standards on working postures and movements ISO 11226 and EN 1005–4. Ergonomics 2007; 50: 1809-1819
• 29 Bordillon P, Pioche M, Wallenhorst T. et al. Double-clip traction for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter study of 599 consecutive cases (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 333-343
• 30 Wijsman PJM, Molenaar L, Van't Hullenaar CDP. et al. Ergonomics in handheld and robot-assisted camera control: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 3919-3925
• 31 Mendes V, Bruyere F, Escoffre JM. et al. Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries. J Robotic Surg 2020; 14: 115-121
• 32 Monfared S, Athanasiadis DI, Umana L. et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic ergonomic risk. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 8397-8402
• 33 Nutz E, Jarvers JS, Theopold J. et al. Effect of an upper body exoskeleton for surgeons on postoperative neck, back and shoulder complaints. J Occup Health 2024; 66: uiae020
• 34 Liu S, Hemming D, Luo RB. et al. Solving the surgeon ergonomic crisis with surgical exosuit. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 236-244
• 35 Cha JS, Athanasiadis DI, Asadi H. et al. Evaluation of a passive arm-support exoskeleton for surgical team members: Results from live surgeries. J Safety Res 2024; 89: 322-330