Effectiveness of Endoscopic versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release on Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract

Background

The present study aims to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes of endoscopic carpal tunnel release (CTR) compared with open release in patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Materials and Methods

Patients with severe CTS who underwent either open or endoscopic CTR between 2017 and 2021 were included in the study, with 38 patients in the open group and 35 in the endoscopic group. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical data, including preoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) scores. Patient outcomes, including postoperative QuickDASH scores, were collected via telephonic survey.

Results

At the time of surgery, the median age of patients in the open group was 61 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 54–69) and 66 years (55–76) in the endoscopic group. At a mean of 5 years follow-up, complete resolution of symptoms was reported in 34 of 38 (89.5%) cases in the open group. In the endoscopic group, all 35 cases showed complete resolution at a mean of 3 years follow-up. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.116). Preoperative to postoperative QuickDASH scores improved by a median of 33.0 (IQR: 14.0–42.1) and 34.0 (25.0–54.3) points in the open and endoscopic groups, respectively (p = 0.136). Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on QuickDASH was achieved in 68.4% of open releases and 85.6% of endoscopic releases (p = 0.101). There were no complications in either group, and patients reported high satisfaction rates. After surgery, the length of time away from work was 9 (6–25) days in the open group and 7 (2–23) days in the endoscopic group (p = 0.454).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that endoscopic and open CTR offer similar outcomes, supporting both options as safe and effective treatment for severe CTS.

Keywords

carpal tunnel syndrome - endoscopic carpal tunnel release - open carpal tunnel release - QuickDASH - severe

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 13. Dezember 2024

Angenommen: 26. Juni 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Juli 2025

• References

• 1 Sevy JO, Sina RE, Varacallo M. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2024
• 2 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282 (02) 153-158
• 3 Ferry S, Pritchard T, Keenan J, Croft P, Silman AJ. Estimating the prevalence of delayed median nerve conduction in the general population. Br J Rheumatol 1998; 37 (06) 630-635
• 4 Bland JD. A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23 (08) 1280-1283
• 5 Lu YT, Deol AK, Sears ED. The association between electrodiagnostic severity and treatment recommendations for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2021; 46 (02) 92-98
• 6 Maggard MA, Harness NG, Chang WT, Parikh JA, Asch SM, Nuckols TK. Carpal Tunnel Quality Group. Indications for performing carpal tunnel surgery: clinical quality measures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (01) 169-179
• 7 Atroshi I, Axelsson G, Gummesson C, Johnsson R. Carpal tunnel syndrome with severe sensory deficit: Endoscopic release in 18 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (05) 484-487
• 8 Calotta NA, Lopez J, Deune EG. Improved surgical outcomes with endoscopic carpal tunnel release in patients with severe median neuropathy. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12 (03) 252-257
• 9 Finestone HM, Woodbury GM, Collavini T, Marchuk Y, Maryniak O. Severe carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical and electrodiagnostic outcome of surgical and conservative treatment. Muscle Nerve 1996; 19 (02) 237-239
• 10 Garg B, Manhas V, Vardhan A. et al. Thumb opposition recovery following surgery for severe carpal tunnel syndrome: A clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological pilot study. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (02) 157.e1-157.e5
• 11 Gutiérrez-Monclus RG, Gutiérrez-Espinoza HJ, Flores-Astudillo AR, Lluch-Homedes AL, Aguirre-Jerez M. Release with or without reconstruction of the transverse carpal ligament for severe carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43 (03) 303-309
• 12 Hattori Y, Doi K, Koide S, Sakamoto S. Endoscopic release for severe carpal tunnel syndrome in octogenarians. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (12) 2448-2453
• 13 Kronlage SC, Menendez ME. The benefit of carpal tunnel release in patients with electrophysiologically moderate and severe disease. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (03) 438-44.e1
• 14 Li M, Jiang J, Zhou Q, Zhang C. Sonographic follow-up after endoscopic carpal tunnel release for severe carpal tunnel syndrome: A one-year neuroanatomical prospective observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20 (01) 157
• 15 Murthy PG, Goljan P, Mendez G, Jacoby SM, Shin EK, Osterman AL. Mini-open versus extended open release for severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand (N Y) 2015; 10 (01) 34-39
• 16 Nolan III WB, Alkaitis D, Glickel SZ, Snow S. Results of treatment of severe carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (06) 1020-1023
• 17 Rhoades CE, Mowery CA, Gelberman RH. Results of internal neurolysis of the median nerve for severe carpal-tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (02) 253-256
• 18 Tang CQY, Lai SWH, Tay SC. Long-term outcome of carpal tunnel release surgery in patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B (10) 1348-1353
• 19 Zhang D, Ostergaard P, Cefalu C, Hall M, Earp BE, Blazar P. Outcomes of mini-open carpal tunnel release in patients with unrecordable preoperative nerve conduction potentials at a minimum of 5 years. Hand (N Y) 2021; 16 (03) 292-297
• 20 Kohanzadeh S, Herrera FA, Dobke M. Outcomes of open and endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a meta-analysis. Hand (N Y) 2012; 7 (03) 247-251
• 21 Trumble TE, Diao E, Abrams RA, Gilbert-Anderson MM. Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release: A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84 (07) 1107-1115
• 22 Vasiliadis HS, Georgoulas P, Shrier I, Salanti G, Scholten RJ. Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014 (01) CD008265
• 23 Orhurhu V, Orman S, Peck J. et al. Carpal tunnel release surgery - A systematic review of open and endoscopic approaches. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10 (06) e112291
• 24 Lee DH, Masear VR, Meyer RD, Stevens DM, Colgin S. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: A cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (06) 1003-1008
• 25 Schwartz JT, Waters PM, Simmons BP. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 1993; 9 (02) 209-213
• 26 Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Bravini E, Ferriero G. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014; 44 (01) 30-39
• 27 Meyers A, Annunziata MJ, Rampazzo A, Bassiri Gharb B. A systematic review of the outcomes of carpal ligament release in severe carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2023; 48 (04) 408.e1-408.e18
• 28 Kumar AA, Lawson-Smith M. Pillar pain after minimally invasive and standard open carpal tunnel release: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2024; 6 (02) 212-221