Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26415532
DOI: 10.1055/a-2641-5532
Original article

Prospective study on outcomes of endotherapy for pancreatic divisum in patients of recurrent acute pancreatitis

Amol Vadgaonkar
1   Institute of Gastrosciences, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (Ringgold ID: RIN81727)
,
1   Institute of Gastrosciences, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (Ringgold ID: RIN81727)
,
1   Institute of Gastrosciences, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (Ringgold ID: RIN81727)
,
Gaurav Patil
1   Institute of Gastrosciences, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (Ringgold ID: RIN81727)
,
Sanil Parekh
1   Institute of Gastrosciences, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (Ringgold ID: RIN81727)
,
Sehajad Vora
1   Institute of Gastrosciences, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (Ringgold ID: RIN81727)
,
1   Institute of Gastrosciences, Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (Ringgold ID: RIN81727)
› Author Affiliations
Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): CTRI/2019/05/019332, Trial registry: Clinical Trials Registry India (http://www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials), Type of Study: Prospective
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims

Minor papilla endotherapy success rate is highly variable for pancreatic divisum (PD) among recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) patients due to frequent relapses. Therefore, we assessed effectiveness and predictors of successful endotherapy.

Patients and methods

This was a prospective observational study of patients with RAP who underwent minor papilla sphincterotomy and prophylactic stenting for PD. Technical success was minor papilla cannulation and successful procedure completion. Primary and secondary outcomes were improvement in recurrent episodes of pain with reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS) score > 50% from baseline and occurrence of chronic pancreatitis (CP) at 12 months, respectively. Predictors of success were assessed by logistic regression.

Results

Ninety-four patients, with median age (interquartile range) 29.5 years (23.7–40.2); the majority male (62 [65.9%]), successfully underwent endotherapy. Typical clinical presentation was abdominal pain in 87 patients (92.5%). The primary outcome was achieved in 65 patients (69.1%). The average number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) sessions was two; technical success was achieved in 88 patients (93.6%). Post-ERCP pancreatitis was the most common adverse event (AE) in 10 patients (10.6%). Signs of CP were seen in 11 patients (11.7%) and mean follow-up period was 12.8 ± 1.3 months. Presence of smoking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.027, P = 0.001) and recurrent attacks of RAP after index ERCP (AOR 0.169, P < 0.001) had lower odds of successful endotherapy outcomes.

Conclusions

Minor papilla endotherapy for RAP significantly improved VAS scores at 12 months among 69.1% of patients with acceptable AEs. Early CP was seen in 11.7% of patients. (Unique identifier: CTRI/2019/05/019332).



Publication History

Received: 11 January 2025

Accepted after revision: 26 May 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 June 2025

Article published online:
24 July 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Amol Vadgaonkar, Nagesh Kamat, Ankit Dalal, Gaurav Patil, Sanil Parekh, Sehajad Vora, Amit Maydeo. Prospective study on outcomes of endotherapy for pancreatic divisum in patients of recurrent acute pancreatitis. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a26415532.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2641-5532
 
  • References

  • 1 Orellana-Donoso M, Milos-Brandenberg D, Benavente-Urtubia A. et al. Incidence and clinical implications of anatomical variations in the pancreas and its ductal system: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Life (Basel) 2023; 13: 1710
  • 2 Bülow R, Simon P, Thiel R. et al. Anatomic variants of the pancreatic duct and their clinical relevance: an MR-guided study in the general population. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 3142-3149
  • 3 Bernard JP, Sahel J, Giovannini M. et al. Pancreas divisum is a probable cause of acute pancreatitis: a report of 137 cases. Pancreas 1990; 5: 248-254
  • 4 Lehman GA, Sherman S. Pancreas divisum. Diagnosis, clinical significance, and management alternatives. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995; 5: 145-170
  • 5 Pai CG, Kamath MG, Shetty MV. et al. Continuing episodes of pain in recurrent acute pancreatitis: Prospective follow up on a standardised protocol with drugs and pancreatic endotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 3538-3545
  • 6 DiMagno MJ, Wamsteker EJ. Pancreas divisum. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011; 13: 150-156
  • 7 Covantev S. Pancreas divisum: a reemerging risk factor for pancreatic diseases. Rom J Intern Med 2018; 56: 233-242
  • 8 Bertin C, Pelletier AL, Vullierme MP. et al. Pancreas divisum is not a cause of pancreatitis by itself but acts as a partner of genetic mutations. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 311-317
  • 9 Heyries L, Barthet M, Delvasto C. et al. Long-term results of endoscopic management of pancreas divisum with recurrent acute pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 376-381
  • 10 Strand DS, Law RJ, Yang D. et al. AGA clinical practice update on the endoscopic approach to recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis: expert review. Gastroenterology 2022; 163: 1107-1114
  • 11 Magnusdottir BA, Baldursdottir MB, Kalaitzakis E. et al. Risk factors for chronic and recurrent pancreatitis after first attack of acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 87-94
  • 12 Kamat N, Pai G, Mallayasamy SR. et al. Direct costs for nonsurgical management of Chronic Pancreatitis in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2018; 18: 315-320
  • 13 Faghih M, Garcia Gonzalez F, Makary MA. et al. Total pancreatectomy for recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis: a critical review of patient selection criteria. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017; 33: 330-338
  • 14 Ahmed Ali U, Issa Y, Bruno MJ. et al. Early surgery versus optimal current step-up practice for chronic pancreatitis (ESCAPE): design and rationale of a randomized trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2013; 13: 49
  • 15 World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194
  • 16 Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2: 175-184
  • 17 Testoni PA. Acute recurrent pancreatitis: Etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 16891-16901
  • 18 Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB et a. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on initial management of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 1096-1101
  • 19 Gardner TB, Adler DG, Forsmark CE. et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Chronic Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 322-339
  • 20 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
  • 21 Rusnak CH, Hosie RT, Kuechler PM. et al. Pancreatitis associated with pancreas divisum: results of surgical intervention. Am J Surg 1988; 155: 641-643
  • 22 Soulen MC, Zerhouni EA, Fishman EK. et al. Enlargement of the pancreatic head in patients with pancreas divisum. Clin Imaging 1989; 13: 51-57
  • 23 Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research?. Indian J Psychol Med 2013; 35: 121-126
  • 24 Kanth R, Samji NS, Inaganti A. et al. Endotherapy in symptomatic pancreas divisum: a systematic review. Pancreatology 2014; 14: 244-250
  • 25 Malik S, Ullah H, Loganathan P. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic therapy in symptomatic pancreatic divisum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2025; 59: 183-189
  • 26 Borak GD, Romagnuolo J, Alsolaiman M. et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after endoscopic minor papilla therapy in symptomatic patients with pancreas divisum. Pancreas 2009; 38: 903-906
  • 27 Mariani A, Di Leo M, Petrone MC. et al. Outcome of endotherapy for pancreas divisum in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 17468-17475
  • 28 Michailidis L, Aslam B, Grigorian A. et al. The efficacy of endoscopic therapy for pancreas divisum: a meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30: 550-558
  • 29 Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M. et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: The Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1251-1261
  • 30 Bertilsson S, Swärd P, Kalaitzakis E. Factors that affect disease progression after first attack of acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1662-1669
  • 31 de Jong DM, Stassen PM, Poley JW. et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic therapy in patients with symptomatic pancreas divisum: a Dutch cohort study. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: 1164-1170
  • 32 Maydeo A, Kamat N, Dalal A. et al. Advances in the management of pain in chronic pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2023; 25: 260-266
  • 33 White JJ, Roberts ZN, Gest TR. et al. Pancreas divisum: a common developmental variant that deserves attention in preclinical medical education. Clin Anat 2014; 27: 1038-1045
  • 34 Fogel EL, Toth TG, Lehman GA. et al. Does endoscopic therapy favorably affect the outcome of patients who have recurrent acute pancreatitis and pancreas divisum?. Pancreas 2007; 34: 21-45
  • 35 Maple JT, Keswani RN, Edmundowicz SA. et al. Wire-assisted access sphincterotomy of the minor papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 47-54