RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2622-3545
Automation in Platelet Function Testing: Current Challenges and Future Directions
Funding The study was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health – Bando Ricerca Corrente. The Hemostasis & Thrombosis Unit of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico is a member of the European Reference Network on Rare Haematological Diseases, EuroBloodNet-Project ID No. 101157011. ERN-EuroBloodNet is partly co-funded by the European Union within the framework of the Fourth EU Health Program.

Abstract
Platelet function testing is essential for diagnosing and managing platelet function disorders, but faces significant challenges due to complex protocols and variability in results. While light transmission aggregometry remains the gold standard for assessing platelet aggregation, it suffers from several limitations, including labor-intensive protocols, variability in reagents, and poor standardization. Over the decades, improvements such as lumi-aggregometry, which integrates granule secretion testing, and impedance whole-blood aggregometry, which simplifies sample handling, have addressed some of these challenges. Advanced granule secretion assays, including high-performance liquid chromatography and flow cytometry, have further enhanced diagnostic capabilities, although these techniques still depend on specialized expertise and expensive equipment. Recently, significant advancements have been made with automated aggregometers, such as the Sysmex CS series, and high-throughput 96-well plate assays, which improve consistency, throughput, and reproducibility. Nonetheless, further refinement in standardized reagents and consensus-driven protocols is required. Microfluidic technologies, exemplified by systems like the Total Thrombus Analysis System (T-TAS), incorporate physiological shear conditions and real-time thrombus formation assessment, providing enhanced diagnostic insights into platelet behavior. Despite their automation and clinical feasibility, these flow-based systems still require broader validation for routine clinical implementation. Further developments should prioritize integrating complementary assays, enhancing automation, and advancing miniaturization to improve standardization and diagnostic accuracy. Future technologies combined with artificial intelligence-based data interpretation hold the promise to transform platelet diagnostics, enabling personalized patient care. However, achieving widespread clinical adoption requires ongoing collaboration between clinicians, laboratories, industry, and regulatory bodies.
Keywords
platelet function tests (aggregometry, flow cytometry, other) - automation - microfluidics - platelet disorders/pathology/inherited, acquired - platelet aggregometry - laboratory hemostasis diagnostics - point-of-care testing (hemostasis or thrombosis) - bleeding disorder—diagnosisAuthors' Contributions
F.B. provided original ideas, wrote, edited, and approved the final version of the manuscript. J.A.G. reviewed and approved the manuscript. A.L. wrote the first draft, coordinated the project, reviewed, and approved the subsequent corrections and improvements.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 15. März 2025
Angenommen: 26. Mai 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
27. Mai 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
17. Juni 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Gomez K, Anderson J, Baker P. et al.; British Society for Haematology Guidelines. Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of heritable platelet disorders in adults and children: A British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol 2021; 195 (01) 46-72
- 2 Cattaneo M. Light transmission aggregometry and ATP release for the diagnostic assessment of platelet function. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35 (02) 158-167
- 3 Alessi MC, Coxon C, Ibrahim-Kosta M. et al. Multicenter evaluation of light transmission platelet aggregation reagents: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology. J Thromb Haemost 2023; 21 (09) 2596-2610
- 4 Cattaneo M, Cerletti C, Harrison P. et al. Recommendations for the standardization of light transmission aggregometry: A consensus of the working party from the platelet physiology subcommittee of SSC/ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11 (06) 1183-1189
- 5 Larsen JB, Hvas AM, Hojbjerg JA. Platelet function testing: Update and future directions. Semin Thromb Hemost 2023; 49 (06) 600-608
- 6 O' Brien JR. Platelet aggregation: Part II: Some results from a new method of study. J Clin Pathol 1962; 15 (05) 452-455
- 7 Born GVR. Aggregation of blood platelets by adenosine diphosphate and its reversal. Nature 1962; 194 (4832): 927-929
- 8 Alessi MC, Sié P, Payrastre B. Strengths and weaknesses of light transmission aggregometry in diagnosing hereditary platelet function disorders. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (03) 763
- 9 Gresele P. Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. Diagnosis of inherited platelet function disorders: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13 (02) 314-322
- 10 Cattaneo M, Lecchi A, Zighetti ML, Lussana F. Platelet aggregation studies: autologous platelet-poor plasma inhibits platelet aggregation when added to platelet-rich plasma to normalize platelet count. Haematologica 2007; 92 (05) 694-697
- 11 Linnemann B, Schwonberg J, Mani H, Prochnow S, Lindhoff-Last E. Standardization of light transmittance aggregometry for monitoring antiplatelet therapy: an adjustment for platelet count is not necessary. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6 (04) 677-683
- 12 Castilloux JF, Moffat KA, Liu Y, Seecharan J, Pai M, Hayward CP. A prospective cohort study of light transmission platelet aggregometry for bleeding disorders: Is testing native platelet-rich plasma non-inferior to testing platelet count adjusted samples?. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106 (04) 675-682
- 13 McGlasson DL, Fritsma GA. Whole blood platelet aggregometry and platelet function testing. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35 (02) 168-180
- 14 Seyfert UT, Haubelt H, Vogt A, Hellstern P. Variables influencing Multiplate(TM) whole blood impedance platelet aggregometry and turbidimetric platelet aggregation in healthy individuals. Platelets 2007; 18 (03) 199-206
- 15 Al Ghaithi R, Drake S, Watson SP, Morgan NV, Harrison P. Comparison of multiple electrode aggregometry with lumi-aggregometry for the diagnosis of patients with mild bleeding disorders. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15 (10) 2045-2052
- 16 Scavone M, Podda GM, Tripodi A, Cattaneo M. Whole blood platelet aggregation measurement by Multiplate™: potential diagnostic inaccuracy of correcting the results for the sample platelet count. Platelets 2023; 34 (01) 2156493
- 17 Mumford AD, Frelinger III AL, Gachet C. et al. A review of platelet secretion assays for the diagnosis of inherited platelet secretion disorders. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114 (01) 14-25
- 18 Gresele P, Harrison P, Bury L. et al. Diagnosis of suspected inherited platelet function disorders: Results of a worldwide survey. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12 (09) 1562-1569
- 19 Holmsen H, Day HJ, Stormorken H. The blood platelet release reaction. Scand J Haematol Suppl 1969; 8: 3-26
- 20 Feinman RD, Lubowsky J, Charo I, Zabinski MP. The lumi-aggregometer: a new instrument for simultaneous measurement of secretion and aggregation by platelets. J Lab Clin Med 1977; 90 (01) 125-129
- 21 Drummond AH, Gordon JL. Letter: Rapid, sensitive microassay for platelet 5HT. Thromb Diath Haemorrh 1974; 31 (02) 366-367
- 22 Flachaire E, Beney C, Berthier A, Salandre J, Quincy C, Renaud B. Determination of reference values for serotonin concentration in platelets of healthy newborns, children, adults, and elderly subjects by HPLC with electrochemical detection. Clin Chem 1990; 36 (12) 2117-2120
- 23 Mezzano D, Harrison P, Frelinger III AL. et al. Expert opinion on the use of platelet secretion assay for the diagnosis of inherited platelet function disorders: Communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Platelet Physiology. J Thromb Haemost 2022; 20 (09) 2127-2135
- 24 Brunet JG, Iyer JK, Badin MS. et al. Electron microscopy examination of platelet whole mount preparations to quantitate platelet dense granule numbers: Implications for diagnosing suspected platelet function disorders due to dense granule deficiency. Int J Lab Hematol 2018; 40 (04) 400-407
- 25 Lawrie AS, Kobayashi K, Lane PJ, Mackie IJ, Machin SJ. The automation of routine light transmission platelet aggregation. Int J Lab Hematol 2014; 36 (04) 431-438
- 26 Ling LQ, Liao J, Niu Q. et al. Evaluation of an automated light transmission aggregometry. Platelets 2017; 28 (07) 712-719
- 27 Frère C, Kobayashi K, Dunois C, Amiral J, Morange PE, Alessi MC. Assessment of platelet function on the routine coagulation analyzer Sysmex CS-2000i. Platelets 2018; 29 (01) 95-97
- 28 Lecchi A, Capecchi M, Padovan L. et al. Evaluation of an automated platelet aggregation method for detection of congenital or acquired platelet function defects. Blood Transfus 2024; 22 (04) 350-359
- 29 Platton S, McCormick Á, Bukht M, Gurney D, Holding I, Moore GW. A multicenter study to evaluate automated platelet aggregometry on Sysmex CS-series coagulation analyzers-preliminary findings. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2018; 2 (04) 778-789
- 30 Bret VE, Pougault B, Guy A. et al. Assessment of light transmission aggregometry on the routine coagulation analyzer Sysmex CS-2500 using CE-marked agonists from Hyphen Biomed. Platelets 2019; 30 (04) 540-542
- 31 Stratmann J, Karmal L, Zwinge B, Miesbach W. Platelet aggregation testing on a routine coagulation analyzer: A method comparison study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2019; 25: 1076029619885184
- 32 Uematsu K, Sakayori T, Ishida H. et al. Correlation between the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and the newly developed APAL system in neuroendovascular patients. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2020; 50 (04) 490-496
- 33 Sakayori T, Kitano K, Watanabe Y. et al. Evaluation of the newly developed adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation level system in aggregometer on automated coagulation analyzer. Clin Lab 2019; 65 (12) 2253-2260
- 34 Sachs UJ, Röder L, Cooper N, Radon C, Kolde HJ. Automated light transmission aggregometry with and without platelet poor plasma reference: A method comparison. TH Open 2023; 7 (01) e56-e64
- 35 Bednar B, Condra C, Gould RJ, Connolly TM. Platelet aggregation monitored in a 96 well microplate reader is useful for evaluation of platelet agonists and antagonists. Thromb Res 1995; 77 (05) 453-463
- 36 Chan MV, Armstrong PC, Warner TD. 96-well plate-based aggregometry. Platelets 2018; 29 (07) 650-655
- 37 Chan MV, Armstrong PCJ, Papalia F, Kirkby NS, Warner TD. Optical multichannel (optimul) platelet aggregometry in 96-well plates as an additional method of platelet reactivity testing. Platelets 2011; 22 (07) 485-494
- 38 Chan MV, Leadbeater PD, Watson SP, Warner TD. Not all light transmission aggregation assays are created equal: Qualitative differences between light transmission and 96-well plate aggregometry. Platelets 2018; 29 (07) 686-689
- 39 Chan MV, Chen MH, Thibord F. et al. Factors that modulate platelet reactivity as measured by 5 assay platforms in 3429 individuals. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2024; 8 (03) 102406
- 40 Lordkipanidzé M, Lowe GC, Kirkby NS. et al.; UK Genotyping and Phenotyping of Platelets Study Group. Characterization of multiple platelet activation pathways in patients with bleeding as a high-throughput screening option: use of 96-well Optimul assay. Blood 2014; 123 (08) e11-e22
- 41 Sun B, Tandon NN, Yamamoto N, Yoshitake M, Kambayashi J. Luminometric assay of platelet activation in 96-well microplate. Biotechniques 2001; 31 (05) 1174-1181 , 1176, 1178 passim
- 42 Martins Lima A, Bragina ME, Burri O. et al. An optimized and validated 384-well plate assay to test platelet function in a high-throughput screening format. Platelets 2019; 30 (05) 563-571
- 43 Mangin PH, Gardiner EE, Nesbitt WS. et al.; Subcommittee on Biorheology. In vitro flow based systems to study platelet function and thrombus formation: Recommendations for standardization: Communication from the SSC on Biorheology of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18 (03) 748-752
- 44 Kundu SK, Heilmann EJ, Sio R, Garcia C, Davidson RM, Ostgaard RA. Description of an in vitro platelet function analyzer–PFA-100. Semin Thromb Hemost 1995; (21 Suppl 2): 106-112
- 45 Cattaneo M, Federici AB, Lecchi A. et al. Evaluation of the PFA-100 system in the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of patients with von Willebrand disease. Thromb Haemost 1999; 82 (01) 35-39
- 46 Koessler J, Kobsar AL, Rajkovic MS. et al. The new INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y cartridge is sensitive to the detection of the P2Y12 receptor inhibition. Platelets 2011; 22 (01) 20-27
- 47 Podda GM, Bucciarelli P, Lussana F, Lecchi A, Cattaneo M. Usefulness of PFA-100 testing in the diagnostic screening of patients with suspected abnormalities of hemostasis: comparison with the bleeding time. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5 (12) 2393-2398
- 48 Favaloro EJ. Clinical utility of closure times using the platelet function analyzer-100/200. Am J Hematol 2017; 92 (04) 398-404
- 49 Hayward CPM, Harrison P, Cattaneo M, Ortel TL, Rao AK. Platelet Physiology Subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 closure time in the evaluation of platelet disorders and platelet function. J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4 (02) 312-319
- 50 Cattaneo M, Pareti FI, Zighetti M, Lecchi A, Lombardi R, Mannucci PM. Platelet aggregation at high shear is impaired in patients with congenital defects of platelet secretion and is corrected by DDAVP: Correlation with the bleeding time. J Lab Clin Med 1995; 125 (04) 540-547
- 51 Szarvas M, Oparaugo P, Udvardy ML. et al. Differential platelet deposition onto collagen in cone-and-plate and parallel plate flow chambers. Platelets 2006; 17 (03) 185-190
- 52 Zhang C, Neelamegham S. Application of microfluidic devices in studies of thrombosis and hemostasis. Platelets 2017; 28 (05) 434-440
- 53 Sikora J, Karczmarska-Wódzka A, Bugieda J, Sobczak P. The use of total thrombus formation analysis system as a tool to assess platelet function in bleeding and thrombosis risk—A systematic review. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22 (16) 8605
- 54 Oimatsu Y, Kaikita K, Ishii M. et al. Total thrombus-formation analysis system predicts periprocedural bleeding events in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6 (04) e005263
- 55 Zheng KL, Wallen H, Aradi D. et al. The Total Thrombus Formation (T-TAS) platelet (PL) assay, a novel test that evaluates whole blood platelet thrombus formation under physiological conditions. Platelets 2022; 33 (02) 273-277
- 56 Arima Y, Kaikita K, Ishii M. et al. Assessment of platelet-derived thrombogenicity with the total thrombus-formation analysis system in coronary artery disease patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14 (04) 850-859
- 57 Lecchi A, La Marca S, Padovan L, Boscarino M, Peyvandi F, Tripodi A. Flow-chamber device (T-TAS) to diagnose patients suspected of platelet function defects. Blood Transfus 2024; 22 (01) 55-64
- 58 Nakajima Y, Yada K, Ogiwara K. et al. A microchip flow-chamber assay screens congenital primary hemostasis disorders. Pediatr Int 2021; 63 (02) 160-167
- 59 Takashio S, Kaikita K, Nishi M. et al. Detection of acquired von Willebrand syndrome after ventricular assist device by total thrombus-formation analysis system. ESC Heart Fail 2020; 7 (05) 3235-3239
- 60 Atari B, Ito T, Nagasato T. et al. A modified microchip-based flow chamber system for evaluating thrombogenicity in patients with thrombocytopenia. Thromb J 2020; 18 (01) 31
- 61 Boggio F, Lecchi A, La Marca S. et al. Use of total thrombus-formation analysis system in detecting acquired platelet function defects: A case report. Int J Lab Hematol 2023; 45 (05) 802-805
- 62 Minami H, Nogami K, Ogiwara K, Furukawa S, Hosokawa K, Shima M. Use of a microchip flow-chamber system as a screening test for platelet storage pool disease. Int J Hematol 2015; 102 (02) 157-162
- 63 Charpy J, Chaghouri PE, Benattar N. et al. Evaluation of the potential utility of the total thrombus-formation analysis system in comparison to the platelet function analyser in subjects with primary haemostatic defects. Br J Haematol 2020; 191 (01) e7-e10
- 64 Yamaguchi Y, Moriki T, Igari A. et al. Studies of a microchip flow-chamber system to characterize whole blood thrombogenicity in healthy individuals. Thromb Res 2013; Aug; 132 (02) 263-270
- 65 Al GhaithiR, Mori J, Nagy Z, Maclachlan A, Hardy L, Philippou H. et al. Evaluation of the Total Thrombus-Formation System (T-TAS): application to human and mouse blood analysis. Platelets 2019; 30 (07) 893-900