PDF icon Download PDF
Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2025; 52(04): 239-246
DOI: 10.1055/a-2620-3297
Extremity/Lymphedema
Original Article

The Preoperative Planning, Design, and Execution of the Freestyle Propeller Flap: A Detailed Description and the Case Series

Hyung Bae Kim 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Seong John Han 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Joon Pio Hong 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
,
Hyunsuk Peter Suh 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
  Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Background

Propeller flap reconstruction has been widely utilized in soft tissue reconstruction due to its versatility and aesthetic outcomes. However, technical challenges and the risk of complications persist. This study aims to provide detailed guidelines on the preoperative planning, intraoperative considerations, and execution of propeller flap surgery to reduce complications.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on 20 consecutive patients undergoing propeller flap reconstruction between January 2018 and December 2020. Preoperative planning involved computed tomography (CT) angiography and color Doppler ultrasound. Flap designs prioritized perforator proximity (<3 cm from the defect), vessel axiality, and tissue laxity assessed by skin pinch tests. Surgical techniques including pedicle skeletonization, flap elevation, rotation, and inset were meticulously followed.

Results

No total flap loss occurred. Partial flap loss was observed in one case (5%). Two flaps (10%) exhibited venous congestion, which resolved following leech therapy without necrosis. Defects were predominantly located on the trunk (80%), with malignancy as the primary cause (55%). Mean follow-up duration was 432 days.

Conclusions

Careful preoperative planning and adherence to meticulous surgical techniques can significantly reduce complications in propeller flap reconstruction. This structured approach offers a reliable framework, particularly beneficial for surgeons less familiar with propeller flap techniques.

Keywords

propeller flap - soft tissue reconstruction - trunk - lower extremities

Authors' Contributions

H.P.S. and H.B.K. conceptualized the study. H.B.K. and S.J.H. conducted the literature review and data extraction. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results and manuscript writing. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.


Ethical Approval

This retrospective study, approved by the Institutional Review Board (No. 2025-0099).


Patient Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the publication of their clinical photographs.




Publication History

Received: 06 October 2024

Accepted: 16 April 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 May 2025

Article published online:
23 July 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Hyakusoku H, Yamamoto T, Fumiiri M. The propeller flap method. Br J Plast Surg 1991; 44 (01) 53-54
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kedar DJ, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. Propeller flaps in the posterior trunk. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (03) 176-183
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Pignatti M, Pinto V, Docherty Skogh AC. et al. How to design and harvest a propeller flap. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (03) 152-160
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ellabban MA, Awad AI, Hallock GG. Perforator-pedicled propeller flaps for lower extremity reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (03) 200-206
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cordova A, D'Arpa S, Rosatti F. et al. Propeller flaps in the head and neck. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (03) 165-170
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 D'Arpa S, Toia F, Pirrello R, Moschella F, Cordova A. Propeller flaps: a review of indications, technique, and results. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014: 986829
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 D'Arpa S, Cordova A, Pignatti M, Moschella F. Freestyle pedicled perforator flaps: safety, prevention of complications, and management based on 85 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (04) 892-906
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hyakusoku H, Ono S. The history of propeller flaps. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (03) 133-138
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Teo TC. Propeller flaps for reconstruction around the foot and ankle. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 22-31
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lazzeri D, Huemer GM, Nicoli F. et al. Indications, outcomes, and complications of pedicled propeller perforator flaps for upper body defects: a systematic review. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40 (01) 44-50
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Cajozzo M, Jiga LP, Jandali Z. et al. Complications and solutions in propeller flap surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2020; 34 (03) 210-220
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Gir P, Cheng A, Oni G, Mojallal A, Saint-Cyr M. Pedicled-perforator (propeller) flaps in lower extremity defects: a systematic review. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (09) 595-601
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Paik JM, Pyon JK. Risk factor analysis of freestyle propeller flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (01) 26-31
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Georgescu AV. Propeller perforator flaps in distal lower leg: evolution and clinical applications. Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39 (02) 94-105
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hong JP, Hur J, Kim HB, Park CJ, Suh HP. The use of color duplex ultrasound for local perforator flaps in the extremity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (03) 233-237
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hallock GG. Doppler sonography and color duplex imaging for planning a perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg 2003; 30 (03) 347-357 , v–vi
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Moore R, Mullner D, Nichols G, Scomacao I, Herrera F. Color Doppler ultrasound versus computed tomography angiography for preoperative anterolateral thigh flap perforator imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (07) 563-570
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Lee JW, Kim HK, Kim SR, Han YS, Park JH. Preoperative identification of a perforator using computed tomography angiography and metal clip marking in perforator flap reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2015; 42 (01) 78-83
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Visconti G, Bianchi A, Hayashi A. et al. Thin and superthin perforator flap elevation based on preoperative planning with ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound. Arch Plast Surg 2020; 47 (04) 365-370
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Min K, Hong JP, Suh HP. Risk factors for partial flap loss in a free flap: a 12-year retrospective study of anterolateral thigh free flaps in 303 lower extremity cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (05) 1071e-1081e
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Song S, Jeong HH, Lee Y. et al. Direction of flap rotation in propeller flaps: does it really matter?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (08) 549-556
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Ozgentaş HE, Shenaq S, Spira M. Study of the delay phenomenon in the rat TRAM flap model. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94 (07) 1018-1024 , discussion 1025–1026
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Wallace CG, Kao HK, Jeng SF, Wei FC. Free-style flaps: a further step forward for perforator flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (06) e419-e426
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Brazio PS, Kovach SJ, Rosson GD, Rad AN. A review of propeller flaps for distal lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction: Is flap loss too high?. Microsurgery 2013; 33 (07) 578-586
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Mohan AT, Sur YJ, Zhu L. et al. The concepts of propeller, perforator, keystone, and other local flaps and their role in the evolution of reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (04) 710e-729e
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Sisti A, D'Aniello C, Fortezza L. et al. Propeller flaps: a literature review. In Vivo 2016; 30 (04) 351-373
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Innocenti M, Menichini G, Baldrighi C, Delcroix L, Vignini L, Tos P. Are there risk factors for complications of perforator-based propeller flaps for lower-extremity reconstruction?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (07) 2276-2286
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Burnier P, Niddam J, Bosc R, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. Indocyanine green applications in plastic surgery: A review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (06) 814-827
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Cha HG, Kang MK, Kim W, Lee JS, Hong JP, Suh HP. Oncologic safety of propeller flap and free flap in reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma resection. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122 (04) 787-794
    Search in Google Scholar