The value of cholangioscopy-guided bite-on-bite (-on bite) biopsies in indeterminate biliary duct strictures

Abstract

Background Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (dSOC) has improved the diagnostic accuracy of indeterminate biliary duct strictures (IBDS) through targeted intraductal biopsy sampling. However, the optimal biopsy technique remains uncertain.

Methods This international, multicenter, prospective interventional study (November 2020–August 2022) included patients with IBDS undergoing dSOC. Stricture sampling involved obtaining at least four single biopsies and at least one bite-on-bite biopsy (BBB) in all patients. Definitive diagnosis was established by pathology outcomes and 1-year clinical follow-up. The primary outcome was the accuracy of both biopsy techniques.

Results 89 patients were included, with 76 hilar strictures and 13 distal strictures. Technical success for obtaining adequate tissue samples was 82/89 (92.1 %) for single biopsies and 78/89 (87.6 %) for BBB. Malignancy was confirmed in 31/82 (37.8 %) and 29/78 (37.2 %) cases in single biopsies and BBB, respectively. Among 76 patients in whom both techniques were successful, pathology results were discordant in three cases (3.9 %), primarily due to understaging by BBB. Among 82 patients with complete follow-up, malignancy was confirmed in 51 (62.2 %). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for malignancy or high grade dysplasia were 66.0 %, 100 %, and 78.8 % for single biopsies, and 63.8 %, 100 %, and 77.6 % for BBB, respectively. Sensitivity and accuracy were significantly decreased after stent placement or intraductal tissue acquisition during prior ERCP. The number of BBBs did not impact sensitivity or accuracy.

Conclusions BBB did not outperform at least four single biopsies for IBDS. Prior manipulation of IBDS, through stent placement or prior tissue acquisition, was associated with a decreased diagnostic yield.

Publication History

Received: 25 September 2024

Accepted after revision: 20 May 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 May 2025

Article published online:
25 June 2025

• References

• 1 Angsuwatcharakon P, Kulpatcharapong S, Moon JH. et al. Consensus guidelines on the role of cholangioscopy to diagnose indeterminate biliary stricture. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24: 17-29
• 2 Navaneethan U, Njei B, Lourdusamy V. et al. Comparative effectiveness of biliary brush cytology and intraductal biopsy for detection of malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 168-176
• 3 Franssen S, de Jong DM, van Driel LMJW. et al. Challenges in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma: pulling together biochemical, radiological, and cytopathological data. Tabibian JH. Diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma: a multidisciplinary approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021: 229-249
• 4 Tummala P, Munigala S, Eloubeidi MA. et al. Patients with obstructive jaundice and biliary stricture +/- mass lesion on imaging: prevalence of malignancy and potential role of EUS-FNA. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 532-537
• 5 Gerhards MF, Vos P, van Gulik TM. et al. Incidence of benign lesions in patients resected for suspicious hilar obstruction. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 48-51
• 6 Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Lourdusamy V. et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 608-614.e602
• 7 Almadi MA, Itoi T, Moon JH. et al. Using single-operator cholangioscopy for endoscopic evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures: results from a large multinational registry. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 574-582
• 8 Stassen PMC, Goodchild G, de Jonge PJF. et al. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of digital single-operator cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 1059-1068
• 9 Stassen PMC, de Jonge PJF, Webster GJM. et al. Clinical practice patterns in indirect peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy: outcome of a European survey. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E1704-E1711
• 10 Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan M. et al. Optimizing outcomes of single-operator cholangioscopy-guided biopsies based on a randomized trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 441-448.e441
• 11 Ogura T, Hirose Y, Ueno S. et al. Prospective registration study of diagnostic yield and sample size in forceps biopsy using a novel device under digital cholangioscopy guidance with macroscopic on-site evaluation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2023; 30: 686-692
• 12 Vargas EJ, Wang Y, Chen ZE. et al. Histological assessment of new cholangioscopy-guided forceps in ERCP biliary stricture sampling: a blinded comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E1233-E1237
• 13 van der Bogt RD, van der Wilk BJ, Oudijk L. et al. Bite-on-bite biopsies for the detection of residual esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 1131-1138
• 14 Dumonceau JM, Deprez PH, Jenssen C. et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline – updated January 2017. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 695-714
• 15 Sharzehi K, Sethi A, Savides T. AGA clinical practice update on management of subepithelial lesions encountered during routine endoscopy: expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20: 2435-2443.e2434
• 16 Nass KJ, Zwager LW, van der Vlugt M. et al. Novel classification for adverse events in GI endoscopy: the AGREE classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 1078-1085.e1078
• 17 Gerges C, Beyna T, Tang RSY. et al. Digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy-guided biopsy sampling versus ERCP-guided brushing for indeterminate biliary strictures: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1105-1113
• 18 Banales JM, Marin JJG, Lamarca A. et al. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 17: 557-588
• 19 Fritzsche J, Smit E, van Delden O. et al. High sensitivity of biliary brush cytology after optimization of protocol in patients with suspected perihilar or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study with historical control. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99: AB629-AB630
• 20 Fujii-Lau LL, Thosani NC, Al-Haddad M. et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy in biliary strictures of undetermined etiology: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 685-693
• 21 Ayoub F, Othman MO. Guidelines on cholangioscopy for indeterminate biliary strictures: one step closer to consensus. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2023; 12: 776-779
• 22 Scheid JF, Rosenbaum MW, Przybyszewski EM. et al. Next-generation sequencing in the evaluation of biliary strictures in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Cancer Cytopathol 2022; 130: 215-230
• 23 Saraiva MM, Ribeiro T, Ferreira JPS. et al. Artificial intelligence for automatic diagnosis of biliary stricture malignancy status in single-operator cholangioscopy: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 339-348
• 24 Marya NB, Powers PD, Petersen BT. et al. Identification of patients with malignant biliary strictures using a cholangioscopy-based deep learning artificial intelligence (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: 268-278.e261
• 25 Peveling-Oberhag J, Zimmermann C, Linzenbold W. et al. Bile duct tissue acquisition by cholangioscopy-guided cryobiopsy technique: first-in-human application. VideoGIE 2023; 8: 158-161
• 26 Gerges C, Peveling-Oberhag J, Welsch L. et al. Biliary cryobiopsy via percutaneous cholangioscopy in indeterminate biliary strictures: a clinical multicenter feasibility study. Endoscopy 2025; 57 (Suppl. 02) S275
• 27 Pleskow DK, Sawhney MS, Upputuri PK. et al. In vivo detection of bile duct pre-cancer with endoscopic light scattering spectroscopy. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 109