Hamostaseologie
DOI: 10.1055/a-2599-9908
Original Article

Performance Evaluation of Different FIX Activity Assays for Determining Nonacog Beta Pegol (N9-GP, Refixia®) Activity Using Reagent-/Platform-Specific Conversion Factors

Christian Irsara
1   Central Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics (ZIMCL), University Hospital of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
,
Andrea Griesmacher
1   Central Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics (ZIMCL), University Hospital of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
3   Austrian Association for Quality Assurance and Standardization of Medical and Diagnostic Tests (ÖQUASTA), Vienna, Austria
,
Bernhard Strasser
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
4   Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
,
Axel Schlagenhauf
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
5   Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
,
Christina Sorschag
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
6   Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
,
Erich Wimmer
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
4   Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
,
Florian Prüller
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
7   Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
,
Janne Cadamuro
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
8   Department of Laboratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
,
Johannes Radek
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
9   Clinical Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Clinic St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria
,
Josef Tomasits
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
10   Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Kepler-University-Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria
,
Josef Seier
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
4   Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
,
Peter Fraunberger
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
11   Central Medical Laboratories, Feldkirch, Austria
,
Peter Quehenberger
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
12   Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
,
Gerald Lirk
13   University of Applied Sciences of Upper Austria, Hagenberg, Austria
,
Sabine Sussitz-Rack
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
3   Austrian Association for Quality Assurance and Standardization of Medical and Diagnostic Tests (ÖQUASTA), Vienna, Austria
6   Institute of Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, Hospital Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria
,
Sylvia Mink
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
11   Central Medical Laboratories, Feldkirch, Austria
14   Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Principality of Liechtenstein
,
Alexander Haushofer
2   Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC), Vienna, Austria
3   Austrian Association for Quality Assurance and Standardization of Medical and Diagnostic Tests (ÖQUASTA), Vienna, Austria
4   Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
› Author Affiliations

Funding The study was supported by a grant supplied by the Austrian Society for Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry (ÖGLMKC).
Preview

Abstract

Background

Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) is a glycoPEGylated FIX replacement product with extended half-life for treatment of haemophilia B patients. Monitoring of N9-GP with clotting-based one-stage FIX assays is complicated by high variations, mainly due to reagent-specific interference with polyethylene glycol.

Methods

In 11 distinct specialized coagulation laboratories in Austria, N9-GP spiked samples were measured in replicates in two distinct surveys, 3 years apart, using five different one-stage assay reagents and one chromogenic FIX assay. Regression analysis was used to investigate if back-calculation of N9-GP levels is feasible.

Results

We could demonstrate a linear relationship between the spiked N9-GP concentration and measured FIX activity levels for all examined assays, suggesting that N9-GP activity may be back-calculated using reagent-/platform-specific conversion factors. Within-laboratory variation after 3 years was acceptable in most, but not all, laboratories.

Conclusion

We demonstrate that back-calculation of N9-GP activity levels may be possible when using one-stage FIX assays. However, we recommend that every laboratory ascertain its own conversion factor. When measuring real patient samples, we encourage simultaneous measurement of N9-GP spiked control material with known concentrations to ensure the validity of the current back-calculation.

Author Contributions

The potential linear relationship between the measured values, the interim reports prepared for the study participants, and the basis of the evaluation were developed and documented by AH. Under supervision of AH all authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. All authors except GL coordinated sample measurements in their respective laboratories. GL performed statistical analyses. CI wrote the original draft, and all other authors commented on the manuscript. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Ethical Approval

Not applicable.


Consent to Participate

Not applicable.


Availability of Data and Materials

Data available on request from the authors.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 22 January 2025

Accepted: 05 May 2025

Article published online:
29 August 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany