Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2592-1431
UDFF and Auto pSWE accurately assess liver steatosis and fibrosis risk in obese patients with MASLD
Einsatz von UDFF und Auto pSWE zur zuverlässigen Bestimmung von Steatose- und Fibroserisiko bei Patient:innen mit MASLDSupported by: Siemens Healthineers

Abstract
Background
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) can progress to fibrosis and cirrhosis. Fibrosis and steatosis assessment with vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) requires a dedicated device and time to obtain ≥10 reliable measurements. Auto pSWE allows for the simultaneous collection of 15 ARFI-based liver stiffness measurements (LSM) and UDFF-based steatosis assessment in a single acquisition.
Methods
This prospective study included patients undergoing liver biopsy, primarily during bariatric surgery, between 11/2021–12/2023. Paired LSM by Auto pSWE/VCTE and steatosis assessments by UDFF/CAP were performed within a median of 1 day before or after biopsy.
Results
134 patients (65% women, mean age: 42.6±13.3 years) with a high prevalence of obesity (mean BMI: 42.7±10.4; MASLD etiology: 88%) were included. Liver biopsy showed significant fibrosis (≥F2) in 27% of patients and moderate steatosis (≥S2) in 51%. A single 1×15 Auto pSWE acquisition and one UDFF measurement were as accurate as the median of 5 measurements. Auto pSWE (AUC: ≥F2=0.58, ≥F3=0.96, F4=0.97) and VCTE (AUC: ≥F2=0.60, ≥F3=0.92, F4=0.93) demonstrated high accuracy for advanced fibrosis stages. UDFF (AUC: ≥S1=0.79, ≥S2=0.78, S3=0.67) and CAP showed similar diagnostic accuracy.
Conclusion
Auto pSWE and UDFF provide accurate, noninvasive tests for advanced liver fibrosis and steatosis in MASLD, even in severely obese patients. Notably, Auto pSWE captures 15 LSM with UDFF in a single acquisition, saving time and eliminating the need for a dedicated device.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Die mit Stoffwechselstörungen assoziierte steatotische Lebererkrankung (Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; MASLD) kann zu Fibrose und Zirrhose führen. Die nicht-invasive Beurteilung von Fibrose und Steatose mittels vibrationskontrollierter transienter Elastografie (VCTE) und Controlled-Attenuation-Parameter-(CAP-)Technologie erfordert ein spezielles Gerät und mindestens 10 verlässliche Messungen. Die ultraschall-basierte Fettfraktion (UDFF) und die Auto-Punkt-Scherwelle (Auto-pSWE) ermöglichen eine Quantifizierung von Lebersteatose und -fibrose in nur einer Akquisition.
Methoden
Diese prospektive Studie umfasste Patient:innen, die zwischen 11/2021 und 12/2023 eine Leberbiopsie erhielten. Paarweise Lebersteifigkeits- und Steatosemessungen durch Auto pSWE/UDFF und VCTE/CAP wurden einen Tag vor oder nach der Leberbiopsie durchgeführt.
Ergebnisse
134 Patient:innen mit hoher Adipositas-Prävalenz wurden eingeschlossen. Eine einzige Akquisition (welche 15 pSWE-Messungen erfasst) durch Auto-pSWE lieferte dieselbe diagnostische Genauigkeit wie der Median aus 5 Messungen. Auto-pSWE (≥F2, AUC=0,58; ≥F3, AUC=0,96; F4, AUC=0,97) und VCTE zeigten eine hohe diagnostische Genauigkeit für die Erfassung einer fortgeschrittenen Fibrose. Die Diagnosegenauigkeit von UDFF (≥S1, AUC=0,79; ≥S2, AUC=0,78) war vergleichbar mit CAP.
Schlussfolgerung
Auto pSWE und UDFF sind präzise, nicht-invasive Methoden zur Diagnostik fortgeschrittener Leberfibrose und -steatose bei Patient:innen mit MASLD. Die simultane Erfassung von 15 pSWE-Messungen und UDFF in einer Akquisition ist zeitsparend und erfordert kein spezielles Gerät.
Publication History
Received: 07 November 2024
Accepted after revision: 16 April 2025
Article published online:
07 August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Riazi K, Azhari H, Charette JH. et al. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7 (09) 851-861
- 2 Loomba R, Wong R, Fraysse J. et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression rates to cirrhosis and progression of cirrhosis to decompensation and mortality: a real world analysis of Medicare data. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 51 (11) 1149-1159
- 3 Castera L, Friedrich-Rust M, Loomba R. Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Disease in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2019; 156 (05) 1264-1281
- 4 Semmler G, Wöran K, Scheiner B. et al. Novel reliability criteria for controlled attenuation parameter assessments for non-invasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8 (03) 321-331
- 5 Kubale R, Schneider G, Lessenich CPN. et al. Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction for Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: Prospective Study of Agreement With MRI PDFF and Sources of Variability in a Heterogeneous Population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2024; 222 (06) e2330775
- 6 Wan T, Köhn N, Kröll D. et al. Applicability and Results of Liver Stiffness Measurement and Controlled Attenuation Parameter Using XL Probe for Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease in Candidates to Bariatric Surgery. A Single-Center Observational Study. Obes Surg 2021; 31 (02) 702-711
- 7 Wong VW, Irles M, Wong GL. et al. Unified interpretation of liver stiffness measurement by M and XL probes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 2019; 68 (11) 2057-2064
- 8 Gao J, Wong C, Maar M. et al. Reliability of performing ultrasound derived SWE and fat fraction in adult livers. Clin Imaging 2021; 80: 424-429
- 9 Barr RG, Wilson SR, Rubens D. et al. Update to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Liver Elastography Consensus Statement. Radiology 2020; 296 (02) 263-274
- 10 Blank V, Petroff D, Wiegand J. et al. M probe comes first: Impact of initial probe choice on diagnostic performance of vibration controlled transient elastography. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54 (03) 358-364
- 11 Schwabl P, Bota S, Salzl P. et al. New reliability criteria for transient elastography increase the number of accurate measurements for screening of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Liver Int 2015; 35 (02) 381-390
- 12 Reiberger T, Schwabl P, Trauner M. et al. Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy. J Vis Exp 2020; 160
- 13 Vienna MUo. Laboratory reference values: AKH Wien; 2024. Available from:. https://www.akhwien.at/default.aspx?pid=3985
- 14 Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. In: . Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2003: 756
- 15 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley; 2013
- 16 Bauer DJM, Nixdorf L, Dominik N. et al. The deep abdominal ultrasound transducer (DAX) increases the success rate and diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography for liver fibrosis assessment in patients with obesity-A prospective biopsy-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 60 (01) 70-82
- 17 EASL. Clinical Practice Guidelines on non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis – 2021 update. J Hepatol 2021; 75 (03) 659-689
- 18 Newsome PN, Sasso M, Deeks JJ. et al. FibroScan-AST (FAST) score for the non-invasive identification of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with significant activity and fibrosis: a prospective derivation and global validation study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5 (04) 362-373
- 19 Petroff D, Blank V, Newsome PN. et al. Assessment of hepatic steatosis by controlled attenuation parameter using the M and XL probes: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6 (03) 185-198
- 20 Karlas T, Petroff D, Feisthammel J. et al. Endoscopic Bariatric Treatment with Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Liner Improves Non-invasive Markers of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Obes Surg 2022; 32 (08) 2495-2503
- 21 Nixdorf L, Hartl L, Ströhl S. et al. Rapid improvement of hepatic steatosis and liver stiffness after metabolic/bariatric surgery: a prospective study. Sci Rep 2024; 14 (01) 17558
- 22 Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H. et al. Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology. Gut 2020; 69 (08) 1382-1403
- 23 Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V. et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. J Hepatol 2023; 79 (06) 1542-1556
- 24 Bauer DJM, Silvestri IA, Mare R. et al. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (ElastQ) accurately rules out liver fibrosis and rules in advanced chronic liver disease across liver disease etiologies: a prospective multicenter study. Ultrasonography 2023; 42 (04) 544-554
- 25 Reiberger T. The Value of Liver and Spleen Stiffness for Evaluation of Portal Hypertension in Compensated Cirrhosis. Hepatol Commun 2022; 6 (05) 950-964
- 26 Mitten EK, Portincasa P, Baffy G. Portal Hypertension in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Challenges and Paradigms. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2023; 11 (05) 1201-1211