RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2572-6342
The Effectiveness of Nasal Conformers in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Following Primary Cheiloplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Funding Open access funding was provided by the Library of Naresuan University.

Abstract
Background
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of nasal conformers in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) following primary cheiloplasty.
Methods
We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), and EBSCO Open Dissertation from inception to November 2023. We included three retrospective and one prospective cohort studies evaluating the effect of postoperative nasal conformers after primary cheiloplasty. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Intervention (ROBINS-I) tool. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to pool data and determine overall effect sizes with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The mean difference (MD) was calculated for nostril height and nostril width outcomes. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024511395).
Results
The four included studies represented 83 treated patients and 84 controls. The overall quality of studies was moderate, as assessed by the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis results showed that nostril width was wider on the cleft side compared with controls (MD = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.56), while nostril height was lower on the cleft side (MD = −0.73; 95% CI: −1.20, −0.26). Ratios for nostril width and nostril height were generally closer to symmetry.
Conclusion
This study suggests that nasal conformers may improve nasal symmetry in patients with UCLP following primary cheiloplasty. Further research, including randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up studies, is needed to confirm these findings and refine the use of nasal conformers in clinical practice.
Authors' Contributions
Conceptualization: all authors. Data curation: all authors. Formal analysis: all authors. Methodology: all authors. Writing – original draft: J.C. and R.T. Writing – review & editing: all authors. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.
Ethical Approval
This is a systematic review and a meta-analysis study where ethical approval was not applicable.
Patient Consent
The patients provided written informed consent for the publication and the use of their images.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 19. Juli 2024
Angenommen: 31. März 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
23. Juli 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Meyer-Marcotty P, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A. Dentofacial self-perception and social perception of adults with unilateral cleft lip and palate. J Orofac Orthop 2009; 70 (03) 224-236
- 2 Sundell AL, Törnhage CJ, Marcusson A. A comparison of health-related quality of life in 5- and 10-year-old Swedish children with and without cleft lip and/or palate. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017; 27 (04) 238-246
- 3 Grayson BH, Cutting CB. Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip, and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001; 38 (03) 193-198
- 4 Yeow VK, Chen PK, Chen YR, Noordhoff SM. The use of nasal splints in the primary management of unilateral cleft nasal deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103 (05) 1347-1354
- 5 Kuo SCH, Lai JP, Hsieh CH, Chen TY, Chang YJ, Huang F. Use of nasal conformer after birth effectively improves nostril symmetry in patients with unilateral incomplete cleft lip. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018; 76 (12) 2612-2617
- 6 Liang Z, Yao J, Chen PKT, Zheng C, Yang J. Effect of presurgical nasoalveolar molding on nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip/palate patients after primary cheiloplasty without concomitant nasal cartilage dissection: early childhood evaluation. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55 (07) 935-940
- 7 Nakajima T, Yoshimura Y, Sakakibara A. Augmentation of the nostril splint for retaining the corrected contour of the cleft lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (02) 182-186
- 8 Mulliken JB, Martínez-Pérez D. The principle of rotation advancement for repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity: technical variations and analysis of results. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (05) 1247-1260
- 9 Kane AA, Pilgram TK, Moshiri M, Marsh JL. Long-term outcome of cleft lip nasal reconstruction in childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (05) 1600-1608
- 10 Liou EJ, Subramanian M, Chen PK, Huang CS. The progressive changes of nasal symmetry and growth after nasoalveolar molding: a three-year follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (04) 858-864
- 11 Chang CS, Por YC, Liou EJ, Chang CJ, Chen PK, Noordhoff MS. Long-term comparison of four techniques for obtaining nasal symmetry in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a single surgeon's experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (04) 1276-1284
- 12 Rossell-Perry P, Romero-Narvaez C, Gavino-Gutierrez A, Figallo-Hudtwalcker O. Postoperative nasal conformers in cleft rhinoplasty: are they efficacious?. J Craniofac Surg 2023; 34 (05) 1416-1419
- 13 Nguyen DC, Myint JA, Lin AY. The role of postoperative nasal stents in cleft rhinoplasty: a systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2024; 61 (12) 1941-1950 10556656231190703
- 14 van der Heijden P, Dijkstra PU, Stellingsma C, van der Laan BF, Korsten-Meijer AGW, Goorhuis-Brouwer SM. Limited evidence for the effect of presurgical nasoalveolar molding in unilateral cleft on nasal symmetry: a call for unified research. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (01) 62e-71e
- 15 Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J. et al. (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane; 2023
- 16 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2021; 10 (01) 89
- 17 Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC. et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355: i4919
- 18 Chang SY, Lonic D, Pai BC, Lo LJ. Primary repair in patients with unilateral complete cleft of lip and primary palate: assessment of outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (2S Suppl 1): S2-S6
- 19 Funayama E, Yamamoto Y, Oyama A. et al. Comparison of nasal symmetry between presurgical nasal stenting and postsurgical nasal retainer placement in unilateral clefts. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (01) 133-136
- 20 Waewsanga S, Pisek P, Surakunprapha P, Piyasin S, Pisek A. Effectiveness of the nasal creator device after cheiloplasty in patients with cleft lip and palate as measured by 3D stereophotogrammetry. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021; 45 (04) 284-290
- 21 Al-Qatami F, Avinoam SP, Cutting CB, Grayson BH, Shetye PR. Efficacy of postsurgical nostril retainer in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with presurgical nasoalveolar molding and primary cheiloplasty-rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (03) 623-629
- 22 Uhm KI, Hwang SH, Choi BG. Cleft lip nose correction with onlay calvarial bone graft and suture suspension in Oriental patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105 (02) 499-503
- 23 Rossell-Perry P, Gavino-Gutierrez A. Mixed dentition period follow-up of primary unilateral cleft nose deformity repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (10) e5313
- 24 Ezra L, Bar Droma E, Baransi A, Friger M, Silberstein E. Evaluation of a novel objective method for the assessment of nasal symmetry among patients with unilateral cleft lip. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2024; 61 (11) 1853-1859
- 25 van Roey VL, Ombashi S, Pleumeekers MM. et al. Comparison of two surgical protocols for the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate: a multidisciplinary systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2024; 53 (10) 803-820
- 26 Bezuhly M. Rapid intraoperative fabrication of an inexpensive, reliable nasal stent for use after primary cleft nasal repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2014; 51 (05) e110-e112
- 27 Obinero CG, Wei S, Tran JT, Govande JV, Nguyen PD, Greives MR. Use it or lose it: predictors of compliance and satisfaction with postoperative nasal stent therapy after primary cleft lip repair. J Craniofac Surg 2024; 35 (04) 1092-1095
- 28 Bhutiani N, Tripathi T, Verma M, Bhandari PS, Rai P. Assessment of treatment outcome of presurgical nasoalveolar molding in patients with cleft lip and palate and its postsurgical stability. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2020; 57 (06) 700-706
- 29 Worley MLPK, Patel KG, Kilpatrick LA. Cleft lip and palate. Clin Perinatol 2018; 45 (04) 661-678