RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2569-9765
Methods for health economic evaluation of complex interventions in healthcare: current practice, challenges and guidance for future research
Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutschAuthors

Abstract
Health economic methods can support the development and evaluation of new healthcare interventions by generating data on the resources used and relating these to a defined benefit. However, the standard methodology of health economic evaluation that is usually used does not do justice to the high degree of complexity of interventions in healthcare. As a result, there is a lack of decision-relevant information, for example, on the preferences of the target group, on spillover effects on the part of carers, or on implementation costs and the role of different contexts in the implementation of interventions into routine care. The UK Medical Research Council’s (MRC) standard-setting framework for complex interventions therefore emphasises the need to incorporate health economic aspects more strongly into all phases of the development and evaluation of complex interventions. To make this possible, the MRC’s recommendations for expanding and adapting the standard methodology of health economic evaluation must be concretised and supplemented. Building on already established methodological procedures, recommendations should be developed and proposals for necessary further research formulated.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 18. Oktober 2024
Angenommen nach Revision: 30. Dezember 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
31. März 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Oktober 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A. et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000; 321: 694-696
- 2 Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J. et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ 2007; 334: 455-459
- 3 Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S. et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008; 337: a1655
- 4 Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health. 2013. 13. 568 AF, Evers SM, Alexeeva D et al. A review of economic evaluations of behavior change interventions: setting an agenda for research methods and practice. J Public Health (Oxf) 2014; 36: 336–344 10.1093/pubmed/fdt080
- 5 Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA. et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021; 374: n2061
- 6 Schrappe M, Pfaff H. Versorgungsforschung vor neuen Herausforderungen: Konsequenzen für Definition und Konzept. Gesundheitswesen 2016; 78: 689-694
- 7 Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K. et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4. Aufl. Oxford: Oxford university press; 2015
- 8 Yagudina RI, Kulikov AU, Serpik VG. et al. Concept of Combining Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Budget Impact Analysis in Health Care Decision-Making. Value Health Reg Issues 2017; 13: 61-66
- 9 Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A. et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 2016; 316: 1093-1103
- 10 Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003; 290: 1624-1632
- 11 Drummond M, Griffin A, Tarricone R. Economic evaluation for devices and drugs – same or different?. Value Health 2009; 12: 402-404
- 12 Meacock RL. Economic evaluation of changes to the organisation and delivery of health services: methods and applications [Dissertation]. Manchester: The University of Manchester; 2017
- 13 Weatherly H, Drummond M, Claxton K. et al. Methods for assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions: Key challenges and recommendations. Health Policy 2009; 93: 85-92
- 14 Alayli-Goebbels AF, Evers SM, Alexeeva D. et al. A review of economic evaluations of behavior change interventions: setting an agenda for research methods and practice. J Public Health (Oxf) 2014; 36: 336-344
- 15 Rogowski W, Payne K, Schnell-Inderst P. et al. Concepts of 'personalization' in personalized medicine: implications for economic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomics 2015; 33: 49-59
- 16 Anderson R, Hardwick R. Realism and resources: Towards more explanatory economic evaluation. Evaluation (Lond) 2016; 22: 323-341
- 17 Tsiachristas A, Stein KV, Evers S. et al. Performing Economic Evaluation of Integrated Care: Highway to Hell or Stairway to Heaven?. Int J of Integr Care 2016; 16: 3
- 18 Bojke L, Schmitt L, Lomas J. et al Economic Evaluation of Environmental Interventions: Reflections on Methodological Challenges and Developments. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15 S 1-9
- 19 Meacock R. Methods for the economic evaluation of changes to the organisation and delivery of health services: principal challenges and recommendations. Health Econ Policy Law 2019; 14: 119-134
- 20 Madan J, Bruce Kumar M, Taegtmeyer M, Barasa E. et al. Seep-CI: A Structured Economic Evaluation Process for Complex Health System Interventions?. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 6780-6891
- 21 Gomes M, Murray E, Raftery J. Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice. Pharmacoeconomics 2022; 40: 367-378