CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25681366
DOI: 10.1055/a-2568-1366
Original article

Impact of age and comorbidities on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes: Large multicenter study in a Western cohort

Sandro Sferrazza
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN367405)
,
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN367405)
2   Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
3   Department of Medicine and Surgery, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN217140)
4   Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Umberto I Enna, Enna, Italy
,
5   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9268)
,
5   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9268)
2   Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
6   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola, Bologna, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18508)
,
Romano Sassatelli
7   Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9260)
,
Giuseppe De Roberto
8   Division of Endoscopy, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9290)
,
Federico Barbaro
9   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18654)
,
Cristiano Spada
9   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18654)
,
Michele Francesco Chiappetta
9   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18654)
,
Francesco Pugliese
10   Operative Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9338)
,
Francesco Cutolo
10   Operative Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9338)
,
Mauro Manno
11   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ramazzini Hospital, Carpi, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN527616)
,
Paola Soriani
11   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ramazzini Hospital, Carpi, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN527616)
,
Erik Rosa Rizzotto
12   Gastroenterology Unit, St. Antonio Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Padova, Italy, Padova, Italy
,
Alessandro Gubbiotti
12   Gastroenterology Unit, St. Antonio Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Padova, Italy, Padova, Italy
,
Gianluca Andrisani
13   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Roma, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN220431)
,
Francesco Di Matteo
13   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Roma, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN220431)
,
Francesco Azzolini
14   Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9372)
,
Alessandro Repici
15   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN437807)
5   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9268)
,
Roberto Di Mitri
1   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN367405)
,
Roberta Maselli
15   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN437807)
5   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9268)
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has emerged as the standard treatment for colorectal lesions. Considering aging of the global population, we aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of colorectal ESD in patients aged ≥ 80 years compared with those aged 65 to 79 years in a large Western cohort.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively enrolled patients aged > 64 years undergoing colorectal ESD, classifying them into a very elderly group (VE-Group, aged > 80 years) and elderly group (E-Group, 65–79 years). Procedure outcomes and safety were compared between the VE-Group and E-Group and between patients with comorbidities and those who were healthy (1-CM-Group and H-Group).

Results

A total of 980 patients were included (269; 27.5% in the VE-Group and 711; 72.5% in the E-Group). En-bloc, R0, and oncological curative resection rates did not differ, nor did intra-procedure or post-procedure adverse events (AEs). Delirium occurrence was registered in VE-group [6 (2.2%) in VE-Group vs 1 (0.1%) in E-Group; P = 0.001; OR = 16.2, (95%CI:1.9–135.2)]. The 1-CM-Group had a higher rate of intra-procedure bleeding (P = 0.001), delayed perforation (P = 0.03), fever onset (P < 0.001), and systemic infections (P = 0.02) compared with the H-Group. Having one or more comorbidities was associated with increased overall AEs (P < 0.001; OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5–3.6).

Conclusions

Colorectal ESD is feasible in elderly patients. Physicians should consider delirium a possible AE in patients older than age 80 years. These findings, which bridge the gap between Asian and Western clinical data, underscore the importance of tailored pre-procedure and post-procedure assessments in a global clinical context.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 16 November 2024

Accepted after revision: 11 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
27 March 2025

Article published online:
12 May 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Sandro Sferrazza, Giulio Calabrese, Marcello Maida, Antonio Capogreco, Roberto de Sire, Paolo Cecinato, Romano Sassatelli, Giuseppe De Roberto, Federico Barbaro, Cristiano Spada, Michele Francesco Chiappetta, Francesco Pugliese, Francesco Cutolo, Mauro Manno, Paola Soriani, Erik Rosa Rizzotto, Alessandro Gubbiotti, Gianluca Andrisani, Francesco Di Matteo, Francesco Azzolini, Alessandro Repici, Roberto Di Mitri, Roberta Maselli. Impact of age and comorbidities on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes: Large multicenter study in a Western cohort. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25681366.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2568-1366
 
  • References

  • 1 Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 361-389
  • 2 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ. et al. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Gastrointestinal Lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 591-622
  • 3 Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R. et al. Colorectal Polypectomy and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 516-545
  • 4 Sninsky JA, Shore BM, Lupu GV. et al. Risk factors for colorectal polyps and cancer. Gastrointest. Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32: 195-213
  • 5 Allescher HD, Weingart V. Optimizing screening colonoscopy: Strategies and alternatives. Visc Med 2019; 35: 215-225
  • 6 World Health Organization. World Report on Ageing and Health. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2015.
  • 7 Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T. et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc 2017; 86: 74-86 e17
  • 8 Kim ER, Chang DK. Management of complications of colorectal submucosal dissection. Clin Endosc 2019; 52: 114-119
  • 9 Kim D-H, Jung Y-W, Jin B-C. et al. Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasm in patients with high Charlson Comorbidity Index Score: A HASID Multicenter Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 6255
  • 10 Velkova A, Wolleswinkel-van Den Bosch JH, Mackenbach JP. The East-West life expectancy gap: Differences in mortality from conditions amenable to medical intervention. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26: 75-84
  • 11 Mather HM, Chaturvedi N, Fuller JH. Mortality and morbidity from diabetes in South Asians and Europeans: 11-Year Follow-up of the Southall Diabetes Survey, London, UK. Diabet Med 1998; 15: 53-59
  • 12 Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL. et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373-383
  • 13 Hurwitz EE, Simon M, Vinta SR. et al. Adding examples to the ASA-Physical Status Classification improves correct assignment to patients. Anesthesiology 2017; 126: 614-622
  • 14 Sanchis J, Soler M, Núñez J. et al. Comorbidity assessment for mortality risk stratification in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome. Eur J Intern Med 2019; 62: 48-53
  • 15 Vardavas CI, Mathioudakis AG, Nikitara K. et al. Prognostic factors for mortality, intensive care unit and hospital admission due to SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies in Europe. Eur Respir Rev 2022; 31: 220098
  • 16 Khan NF, Perera R, Harper S. et al. Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS Coded databases. BMC Fam Pract 2010; 11: 1
  • 17 Rex DK, Hassan C, Bourke MJ. The colonoscopist’s guide to the vocabulary of colorectal neoplasia: Histology, morphology, and management. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 253-263
  • 18 Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo S. et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) Magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 526-533
  • 19 Kothari ST, Huang RJ, Shaukat A. et al. ASGE Review of Adverse Events in Colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 863-876 e33
  • 20 European Delirium Association; American Delirium Society. The DSM-5 Criteria, level of arousal and delirium diagnosis: Inclusiveness is safer. BMC Med 2014; 12: 141
  • 21 McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M. et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 3599-3726
  • 22 Flynn DE, Mao D, Yerkovich ST. et al. The impact of comorbidities on post-operative complications following colorectal cancer surgery. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0243995
  • 23 Lee SB, Oh JH, Park JH. et al. Differences in youngest-old, middle-old, and oldest-old patients who visit the Emergency Department. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2018; 5: 249-255
  • 24 Schoenborn NL, Blackford AL, Joshu CE. et al. Life expectancy estimates based on comorbidities and frailty to inform preventive care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70: 99-109
  • 25 Koseki M, Nishimura M, Beauvais JC. et al. Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection in older patients is safe and feasible: A retrospective single-center cohort study in the United States. J Clin Med 2023; 13: 228
  • 26 Kikuchi O, Mouri H, Matsueda K. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of patients aged 75 years and over with esophageal cancer. ISRN Gastroenterol 2012; 2012: 1-5
  • 27 Inokuchi Y, Ishida A, Hayashi K. et al. Feasibility of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years. World J. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14: 49-62
  • 28 Takahashi Y, Mizuno K, Takahashi K. et al. Long-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32: 567-573
  • 29 Hayat M, Yang D, Draganov PV. Third-space endoscopy: The final frontier. Gastroenterol Rep 2022; 11: goac077
  • 30 Moreira P, Cardoso P, Macedo G. et al. Endoscopic Submucosal dissection, endoscopic mucosal resection, and transanal minimally invasive surgery for the management of rectal and anorectal lesions: A narrative review. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 4777
  • 31 Zhang X, Hou A, Cao J. et al. Association of diabetes mellitus with postoperative complications and mortality after non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Endocrinol 2022; 13: 841256
  • 32 Panayi AC, Orkaby AR, Sakthivel D. et al. Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2019; 218: 393-400
  • 33 Bottino V, Esposito MG, Mottola A. et al. Early outcomes of colon laparoscopic resection in the elderly patients compared with the younger. BMC Surg 2012; 12: S8
  • 34 Ngu J C-Y, Kuo L-J, Teo NZ. Minimally invasive surgery in the geriatric patient with colon cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11: 540-544
  • 35 Ang N, Chandramouli C, Yiu K. et al. Heart failure and multimorbidity in Asia. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2023; 20: 24-32
  • 36 Ma RCW, Chan JCN. Type 2 diabetes in East Asians: Similarities and differences with populations in Europe and the United States. Ann NY Acad Sci 2013; 1281: 64-91
  • 37 Kraemer MB, Priolli DG, Reis IGM. et al. Home-based, supervised, and mixed exercise intervention on functional capacity and quality of life of colorectal cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 2471
  • 38 Dale CR, Kannas DA, Fan VS. et al. Improved analgesia, sedation, and delirium protocol associated with decreased duration of delirium and mechanical ventilation. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2014; 11: 367-374
  • 39 Banerjee A, McGrane S, Pandharipande P. Minimizing perioperative sedation to reduce delirium. Future Neurol 2010; 5: 357-361