Acute Traumatic Subdural Hematomas—When (and Why) Do We Stop? The aSDH-stop Survey

Abstract

Objective

This study investigates the decision-making process among neurosurgeons regarding the surgical management of acute subdural hematomas (aSDH), focusing on the role of non-classical Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) factors such as brainstem reflexes, hypocoagulation, and patient comorbidity, alongside traditional guidelines.

Methods

We conducted an international survey that presented neurosurgeons with real-case scenarios, designed to assess the impact of both traditional and non-traditional prognostic indicators on their surgical decisions. The survey also collected demographic data to examine potential correlations with decision-making preferences.

Results

The survey garnered 67 responses from neurosurgeons across 22 countries, revealing a reliance on non-classical BTF factors in decision-making for aSDH cases with a potentially poor prognosis. No significant correlations were found between these decision-making practices and the surgeons' demographic characteristics.

Conclusion

The findings highlight the complexity and nuanced nature of surgical decision-making in aSDH management, underlining the importance of non-traditional prognostic factors. The results advocate for further research to refine clinical guidelines, ensuring they encapsulate the breadth of factors considered in practice, thereby enhancing patient-centered care.

Keywords

subdural hematomas - brain trauma - traumatic brain injury - neurotrauma

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 09. November 2024

Angenommen: 13. März 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
18. März 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. November 2025

• References

• 1 Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J. et al; Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group. Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (3, Suppl): S16-S24 , discussions i-iv
• 2 Early Indicators of Prognosis in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Trauma Foundation. Published May 31, 2007 . Accessed at: https://braintrauma.org/coma/guidelines/prognosis
• 3 Chen SH, Sun JM, Fang WK. The impact of time from injury to surgery in functional recovery of traumatic acute subdural hematoma. BMC Neurol 2020; 20 (01) 226
• 4 Sadaka F, Patel D, Lakshmanan R. The FOUR score predicts outcome in patients after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care 2012; 16 (01) 95-101
• 5 Maegele M, Schöchl H, Menovsky T. et al. Coagulopathy and haemorrhagic progression in traumatic brain injury: advances in mechanisms, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16 (08) 630-647
• 6 Mollayeva T, Xiong C, Hanafy S. et al. Comorbidity and outcomes in traumatic brain injury: protocol for a systematic review on functional status and risk of death. BMJ Open 2017; 7 (10) e018626
• 7 Xiong C, Hanafy S, Chan V. et al. Comorbidity in adults with traumatic brain injury and all-cause mortality: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (11) e029072
• 8 Benoliel JQ, McCorkle R, Young K. Development of a social dependency scale. Res Nurs Health 1980; 3 (01) 3-10
• 9 Berdine G. The Hippocratic Oath and principles of medical ethics. The Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles 2015; 3 (09) 28-32 . Accessed at: https://pulmonarychronicles.com/index.php/pulmonarychronicles/article/view/185
• 10 Young M, Wagner A. Medical Ethics. [Updated 2022 Nov 28]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; January 2024