Do Functional Movement Screens Predict Body Composition Changes after Resistance Training?

Abstract

Although the function movement screen (FMS) has been widely used in the general population, no study to date has used the FMS as a preparticipation screen for individuals with breast cancer (BC) engaging in an exercise regimen. Even though individuals with BC are anthropometrically similar to individuals without cancer, the lack of studies assessing the FMS in individuals with BC may potentially hinder exercise prescription. Therefore, we aim to examine the relationships of the FMS score to anthropometric biomarkers in individuals with BC before undergoing an exercise regimen. One-hundred and twelve women with BC underwent a thrice-weekly three-month dose-escalated exercise regimen utilizing multi-joint compound movements and linear progression balanced with resistance training volume to elicit hypertrophy. FMS score and anthropometric markers were assessed pre- and post-intervention. With significance set at p≤0.05, baseline FMS scores correlated significantly with all anthropometric markers, and was similar to previous studies published in non-cancer populations. However, baseline FMS scores were not associated with changes in anthropometric markers, from pre- to post-intervention. While the baseline FMS score was not associated with changes in anthropometric markers, the similar correlation found in our study compared to previous studies suggest that the FMS can be used as a preparticipation in individuals with BC to help guide the exercise regimen. Future studies designed to elicit weight loss in individuals with BC should assess whether the baseline FMS score is predictive of anthropometric changes.

Keywords

functional movement screen - resistance training - breast cancer

Publication History

Received: 29 September 2024

Accepted: 24 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
28 April 2025

Article published online:
24 June 2025

• References

• 1 Champ CE, Carpenter DJ, Diaz AK. et al. Resistance training for patients with cancer: A conceptual framework for maximizing strength, power, functional mobility, and body composition to optimize health and outcomes. Sports Med 2023; 53: 75-89
• 2 Beardsley C, Contreras B. The Functional Movement Screen: A review. Strength Cond J 2014; 36: 72-80
• 3 Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can Serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason Functional Movement Screen?. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2007; 2: 147-158
• 4 Minthorn LM, Fayson SD, Stobierski LM. et al. The Functional Movement Screen's ability to detect changes in movement patterns after a training intervention. J Sport Rehabil 2015; 24: 322-326
• 5 Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function – part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2006; 1: 132-139
• 6 Bonazza NA, Smuin D, Onks CA. et al. Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the Functional Movement Screen: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2017; 45: 725-732
• 7 Mitchell UH, Johnson AW, Vehrs PR. et al. Performance on the Functional Movement Screen in older active adults. J Sport Heal Sci 2016; 5: 119-125
• 8 Perry FT, Koehle MS. Normative data for the Functional Movement Screen in middle-aged adults. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 458-462
• 9 Carpenter DJ, Peluso C, Hilton C. et al. EXERT-BC: A pilot study of an exercise regimen designed to improve functional mobility, body composition, and strength after the treatment for breast cancer. Cancer Med 2024; 13: e7001
• 10 Gnacinski SL, Cornell DJ, Meyer BB. et al. Functional Movement Screen factorial validity and measurement invariance across sex among collegiate student-athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 3388-3395
• 11 Kiesel K, Plisky P, Butler R. Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off-season intervention program in professional football players. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2011; 21: 287-292
• 12 Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 674-688
• 13 Champ CE, Peluso C, Carenter DJ. et al. EXERT-BC: Prospective study of an exercise regimen after treatment for breast cancer. Sports Med Int Open 2024; 8: a21930922
• 14 Jagim AR, Camic CL, Kisiolek J. et al. Accuracy of resting metabolic rate prediction equations in athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2018; 32: 1875-1881
• 15 Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1985; 10: 141-146
• 16 Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K. et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1625-1638
• 17 Azrad M, Demark-Wahnefried W. The association between adiposity and breast cancer recurrence and survival: A review of the recent literature. Curr Nutr Rep 2014; 3: 9-15
• 18 Chaston TB, Dixon JB, O'Brien PE. Changes in fat-free mass during significant weight loss: a systematic review. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007; 31: 743-750
• 19 Caan BJ, Cespedes Feliciano EM, Prado CM. et al. Association of muscle and adiposity measured by computed tomography with survival in patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4: 798-804
• 20 Fearon K, Arends J, Baracos V. Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2013; 10: 90-99
• 21 American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708
• 22 Rosenberg J, Hyde PN, Yancy WS. et al. Quantity of resistance exercise for breast cancer patients: Does the dose match the objective?. J Strength Cond Res 2021; 35: 1467-1476
• 23 Farrell SW, Pavlovic A, Barlow CE. et al. Functional Movement Screening performance and association with key health markers in older Adults. J Strength Cond Res 2021; 35: 3021-3027
• 24 Perry FT, Koehle MS. Normative data for the functional movement screen in middle-aged adults. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 458-462