Artificial intelligence-assisted esophagogastroduodenoscopy improves procedure quality for endoscopists in early stages of training

Abstract

Background and study aims

Completeness of esophagagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) varies among endoscopists, leading to a high miss rate for gastric neoplasms. This study aimed to determine the effect of the Cerebro real-time artificial intelligence (AI) system on completeness of EGD for endoscopists in early stages of training.

Patients and methods

The AI system was built with CNN and Motion Adaptive Temporal Feature Aggregation (MA-TFA). A prospective sequential cohort study was conducted. Endoscopists were taught about the standardized EGD protocol to examine 27 sites. Then, each subject performed diagnostic EGDs per protocol (control arm). After completion of the required sample size, subjects performed diagnostic EGDs with assistance of the AI (study arm). The primary outcome was the rate of completeness of EGD. Secondary outcomes included overall inspection time, individual site inspection time, completeness of photodocumentation, and rate of positive pathologies.

Results

A total of 466 EGDs were performed with 233 in each group. Use of AI significantly improved completeness of EGD [mean (SD) (92.6% (6.2%) vs 71.2% (16.8%)]; P <0.001 (95% confidence interval 19.2%–23.8%, SD 0.012). There was no difference in overall mean (SD) inspection time [765.5 (338.4) seconds vs 740.4 (266.2); P=0.374]. Mean (SD) number of photos for photo-documentation significantly increased in the AI group [26.9 (0.4) vs 10.3 (4.4); P <0.001]. There was no difference in detection rates for pathologies in the two groups [8/233 (3.43%) vs 5/233 (2.16%), P=0.399].

Conclusions

Completeness of EGD examination and photodocumentation by endoscopists in early stages of are improved by the AI-assisted software Cerebro.

Keywords

Quality and logistical aspects - Training - Image and data processing, documentatiton - Quality management

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 04. Oktober 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 11. Februar 2025

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. April 2025

• References

• 1 Menon S, Trudgill N. How commonly is upper gastrointestinal cancer missed at endoscopy? A meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2014; 2: E46-E50
• 2 Hamashima C, Fukao A. Quality assurance manual of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in Japanese communities. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2016; 46: 1053-1061
• 3 Bisschops R, Areia M, Coron E. et al. Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 4: 629-656
• 4 Nagula S, Parasa S, Laine L. et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update on High-Quality Upper Endoscopy: Expert review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 22: 933-943
• 5 Teh JL, Tan JR, Lau LJ. et al. Longer examination time improves detection of gastric cancer during diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 480-487 e482
• 6 Messmann H, Bisschops R, Antonelli G. et al. Expected value of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 1211-1231
• 7 Yao K. The endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol 2013; 26: 11-22
• 8 Fernandez-Esparrach G, Bernal J, Lopez-Ceron M. et al. Exploring the clinical potential of an automatic colonic polyp detection method based on the creation of energy maps. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 837-842
• 9 Kanesaka T, Lee TC, Uedo N. et al. Computer-aided diagnosis for identifying and delineating early gastric cancers in magnifying narrow-band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1339-1344
• 10 Misawa M, Kudo SE, Mori Y. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted polyp detection for colonoscopy: Initial experience. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 2027-2029 e2023
• 11 Urban G, Tripathi P, Alkayali T. et al. Deep learning localizes and identifies polyps in real time with 96% accuracy in screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 1069-1078 e1068
• 12 Horie Y, Yoshio T, Aoyama K. et al. Diagnostic outcomes of esophageal cancer by artificial intelligence using convolutional neural networks. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 25-32
• 13 Ebigbo A, Mendel R, Ruckert T. et al. Endoscopic prediction of submucosal invasion in Barrett's cancer with the use of artificial intelligence: a pilot study. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 878-883
• 14 Wu L, Zhang J, Zhou W. et al. Randomised controlled trial of WISENSE, a real-time quality improving system for monitoring blind spots during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gut 2019; 68: 2161-2169
• 15 Siau K, Beales ILP, Haycock A. et al. JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Frontline Gastroenterol 2022; 13: 193-205
• 16 Yao K, Uedo N, Kamada T. et al. Guidelines for endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc 2020; 32: 663-698
• 17 Beg S, Ragunath K, Wyman A. et al. Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS). Gut 2017; 66: 1886-1899
• 18 Park JM, Kim SY, Shin GY. et al. Implementation effect of institutional policy of EGD observation time on neoplasm detection. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 1152-1159
• 19 Hosokawa O, Tsuda S, Kidani E. et al. Diagnosis of gastric cancer up to three years after negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 669-674
• 20 Tatsuta M, Iishi H, Okuda S. et al. Prospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of gastrofiberscopic biopsy in diagnosis of gastric cancer. Cancer 1989; 63: 1415-1420
• 21 Pimenta-Melo AR, Monteiro-Soares M, Libanio D. et al. Missing rate for gastric cancer during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28: 1041-1049
• 22 Rodrigues T, Keswani R. Endoscopy training in the age of artificial intelligence: Deep learning or artificial competence?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 8-10
• 23 Grover SC, Walsh CM. Integrating artificial intelligence into endoscopy training: opportunities, challenges, and strategies. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9: 11-13