Semin Thromb Hemost 2025; 51(06): 698-705
DOI: 10.1055/a-2546-0441
Review Article

Factor Inhibitor Testing: An Update from Australasia/Asia-Pacific

1   Department of Haematology, Sydney Centres for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR), Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
2   Faculty of Science and Health, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
3   School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
,
Sandya Arunachalam
4   RCPAQAP Haematology, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors represent antibodies that develop against coagulation FVIII and reduce FVIII functional activity. FVIII inhibitors may develop in patients with congenital hemophilia A (CHA) in response to infused FVIII (allo-antibodies) or in patients without CHA in a variety of situations (auto-antibodies; acquired hemophilia A). We report updated findings for FVIII inhibitor testing in our geographic region using recent data (testing for the past 5 years; 2020–2024 inclusive) from the RCPAQAP (Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program), an international external quality assessment (EQA) program, with over 80 enrolments for the FVIII inhibitor module. Four samples are assessed each year, with these comprising both FVIII inhibitor negative samples and FVIII inhibitor positive samples with various inhibitor titers. This EQA data largely evidences favorable findings in FVIII inhibitor testing in our jurisdiction, with >99% of test results interpreted correctly by participants for the presence (“detected”) or absence (“not detected”) of FVIII inhibitors in assessed samples. Moreover, most errors in interpretation appear to be transcription or data entry errors rather than analytic errors. The coefficient of variation (CV) values for FVIII inhibitor samples were moderately high, ranging from 25 to 40%, irrespective of the inhibitor titer (range: 3–64 Bethesda units [BU]/mL) or the method (i.e., Bethesda vs. Nijmegen). In conclusion, most laboratories were able to correctly identify the presence versus absence of FVIII inhibitors, although laboratory-reported titers varied moderately.

Authors' Contributions

Both authors contributed to various elements of the study execution, study design, and data analysis. E.J.F. wrote the original draft of the manuscript; both authors contributed to revision and approved the manuscript for submission and publication.




Publication History

Received: 17 February 2025

Accepted: 24 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
27 February 2025

Article published online:
07 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA