Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25442572
DOI: 10.1055/a-2544-2572
Original article

Internal traction in endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial lesions arising from the muscularis propria: Comparative study

Jun Li
1   Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China (Ringgold ID: RIN278245)
,
Xiaojia Hou
1   Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China (Ringgold ID: RIN278245)
,
Kan Chen
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China (Ringgold ID: RIN278245)
,
Kangsheng Peng
1   Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China (Ringgold ID: RIN278245)
,
Chao Huang
1   Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China (Ringgold ID: RIN278245)
,
Feng Liu
1   Digestive Endoscopy Center, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China (Ringgold ID: RIN278245)
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Background and study aims

Effective tissue traction is crucial for gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) to ensure a clear visual field for the dissection site. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of internal traction using a novel clip-with-spring device in assisting gastric EFTR.

Patients and methods

Twenty-six patients with gastric subepithelial lesions from the muscularis propria were enrolled for internal traction-assisted EFTR (IT-EFTR) and 26 patients for non-assisted EFTR (NA-EFTR) were enrolled as controls.

Results

Average tumor size was 1.5 ± 0.4 cm. All EFTRs were completed successfully with an average total procedure time of 62.4 ± 43.0 minutes and perforation time of 37.2 ± 29.9 minutes. En bloc resection was achieved in 50 patients (96.2%). IT-EFTR significantly improved serosa exposure score (3.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 0.7, P <0.001) and shortened total procedure time (33.0 ± 21.8 vs. 91.8 ± 38.6 min, P <0.001) and perforation time (19.0 ± 18.8 vs. 55.5 ± 27.8 min, P <0.001) compared with NA-EFTR. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the two groups. However, visual analogue score after the procedure was significantly lower (4.2 ± 1.0 vs. 4.7 ± 0.7, P=0.037) and postoperative hospital stay (3.7 ± 2.1 vs. 4.8 ± 1.3, P=0.038) was significantly shorter in the IT-ERTR group than in the NA-EFTR group.

Conclusions

Internal traction using the novel clip-with-spring device could significantly improve safety and efficacy of gastric EFTR in the distal stomach.



Publication History

Received: 04 August 2024

Accepted after revision: 14 February 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 February 2025

Article published online:
12 June 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Jun Li, Xiaojia Hou, Kan Chen, Kangsheng Peng, Chao Huang, Feng Liu. Internal traction in endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial lesions arising from the muscularis propria: Comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a25442572.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2544-2572
 
  • References

  • 1 Wang K, Gao P, Cai M. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection, indication, methods and perspectives. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: 195-205
  • 2 Li J, Meng Y, Ye S. et al. Usefulness of the thread-traction method in endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumor: a comparative study. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 2880-2885
  • 3 Gu L, Wang X, Ouyang M. et al. Facilitating endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric submucosal tumors with a novel snare traction method (with video). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39: 535-543
  • 4 Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Fujihara S. et al. Traction-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection followed by O-ring and over-the-scope clip closure in the stomach: an animal experimental study. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9: E51-E57
  • 5 Ni L, Liu X, Wu A. et al. Endoscopic full‑thickness resection with clip‑ and snare‑assisted traction for gastric submucosal tumours in the fundus: A single‑centre case series. Oncol Lett 2023; 25: 151
  • 6 Shi Q, Li B, Qi ZP. et al. Clinical values of dental floss traction assistance in endoscopic full-thickness resection for submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer in the gastric fundus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28: 1261-1265
  • 7 Li B, Shi Q, Qi ZP. et al. The efficacy of dental floss and a hemoclip as a traction method for the endoscopic full-thickness resection of submucosal tumors in the gastric fundus. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 3864-3873
  • 8 Li J, Wei Y, Zhang D. et al. Comparison between preincision traction and on-demand traction in assisting colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2022; 13
  • 9 Li J, Shen M, Wei Y. et al. Traction-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection for a colonic submucosal tumor. Endoscopy 2022; 54: E818-E819
  • 10 Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR. et al. NCCN Task Force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010; 8: S1-S41 quiz S42-S4
  • 11 Matsuzaki I, Hattori M, Yamauchi H. et al. Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors (with video). Surg Endosc 2020; 34: 1012-1018
  • 12 Schmidt A, Beyna T, Schumacher B. et al. Colonoscopic full-thickness resection using an over-the-scope device: a prospective multicentre study in various indications. Gut 2018; 67: 1280-1289
  • 13 Meier B, Stritzke B, Kuellmer A. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic full-thickness resection in the colorectum: Results from the German Colonic FTRD Registry. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 1998-2006
  • 14 Zwager LW, Bastiaansen BAJ, Bronzwaer MES. et al. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) of colorectal lesions: results from the Dutch colorectal eFTR registry. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 1014-1023
  • 15 Chiu PW, Phee SJ, Wang Z. et al. Feasibility of full-thickness gastric resection using master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot and closure by Overstitch: a preclinical study. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 319-324
  • 16 Kaan HL, Ho KY. Robot-assisted endoscopic resection: Current status and future directions. Gut Liver 2020; 14: 150-152
  • 17 Sakamoto N, Osada T, Shibuya T. et al. The facilitation of a new traction device (S-O clip) assisting endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms. Endoscopy 2008; 40: E94-E95
  • 18 Ritsuno H, Sakamoto N, Osada T. et al. Prospective clinical trial of traction device-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of large superficial colorectal tumors using the S-O clip. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 3143-3149
  • 19 Kawaguchi K, Ikebuchi Y, Isomoto H. Novel pre-incision clip and traction method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: e107-e108
  • 20 Nagata M, Fujikawa T, Munakata H. Comparing a conventional and a spring-and-loop with clip traction method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastric neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 1097-1109