Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2543-0400
Endoscopic Sustainability PrimAry Reporting Essentials (E-SPARE): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

Abstract
A growing number of studies aim to evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy services from the perspective of their environmental impact. However, there are currently no guidelines or frameworks which provide specifically for the reporting of endoscopy sustainability studies, and a variety of metrics and assessment tools have been employed in the literature. To improve the clarity, transparency, and quality of reporting, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has developed a reporting framework for the community of researchers interested in conducting studies on sustainable GI endoscopy.
‡ Joint first authors
* Joint senior authors
Publication History
Article published online:
20 March 2025
© 2025. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Lenzen M, Malik A, Li M. et al. The environmental footprint of health care: a global assessment. Lancet Planet Health 2020; 4: e271-279
- 2 Rodríguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H. et al. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 797-826
- 3 Sebastian S, Dhar A, Baddeley R. et al. Green endoscopy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Joint Accreditation Group (JAG) and Centre for Sustainable Health (CSH) joint consensus on practical measures for environmental sustainability in endoscopy. Gut 2023; 72: 12-26
- 4 Neves JAC, de Santiago ER, Pohl H. et al. Perspectives and awareness of endoscopy healthcare professionals on sustainable practices in gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of the LEAFGREEN survey. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 355-363
- 5 Cunha MF, Pellino G. Environmental effects of surgical procedures and strategies for sustainable surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 20: 399-410
- 6 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Glossary, annex I 2018. Accessed 23 Mar 2024: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/glossary/
- 7 Carbon Trust. A guide to carbon footprinting for businesses. Accessed 13 Mar 2024: https://www.carbontrust.com/en-eu/our-work-and-impact/guides-reports-and-tools/a-guide-to-carbon-footprinting-for-businesses
- 8 United States Environmental Protection Agency. What is a circular economy?. Accessed 23 Mar 2024: https://www.epa.gov/recyclingstrategy/what-circular-economy
- 9 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14040:2006(en) Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework. Accessed 16 Mar 2024: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:14040:ed-2:v1:en
- 10 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Understanding global warming potentials. Accessed 16 Mar 2024: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials
- 11 Maurice JB, Siau K, Sebastian S. et al. Green endoscopy: a call for sustainability in the midst of COVID-19. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5: 636-638
- 12 Centre for Sustainable Healthcare (CSH) Networks. Green endoscopy. Accessed 23 Mar 2024: https://networks.sustainablehealthcare.org.uk/network/green-endoscopy
- 13 Finkbeiner M. The international standards as the constitution of life cycle assessment: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring. In: Klöpffer W. (ed.). Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014: 85-106
- 14 de Melo Jr. SW, Taylor GL, Kao JY. Packaging and waste in the endoscopy suite. Techniques Innovations Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 23: 371-375
- 15 Neves JAC, Roseira J, Queirós P. et al. Targeted intervention to achieve waste reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut 2023; 72: 306-313
- 16 Barna S, Maric F, Simons J. et al. Education for the Anthropocene: planetary health, sustainable health care, and the health workforce. Med Teach 2020; 42: 1091-1096
- 17 Whitmee S, Haines A, Beyrer C. et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on Planetary Health. Lancet 2015; 386: 1973-2028
- 18 Karliner J, Slotterback S, Boyd R. et al. Health care’s climate footprint Health care without harm 2019. Accessed 23 Mar 2024: https://noharm-global.org/sites/default/files/documents-files/5961/HealthCaresClimateFootprint_092319.pdf
- 19 World Resources Institute. Greenhouse gas protocol 2022. Accessed 23 Mar 2024: https://www.wri.org/initiatives/greenhouse-gas-protocol
- 20 Mortimer F, Isherwood J, Wilkinson A. et al. Sustainability in quality improvement: redefining value. Future Healthc J 2018; 5: 88-93
- 21 Ganatra S, Dani SS, Al-Kindi SG. et al. Health care and climate change: challenges and pathways to sustainable health care. Ann Intern Med 2022; 175: 1598-1600
- 22 Elkington J. Enter the triple bottom line. 2013 Accessed 29 Mar 2024: https://johnelkington.com/archive/TBL-elkington-chapter.pdf
- 23 Hassan C, Ponchon T, Bisschops R. et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) publications policy – Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 123-126
- 24 Gordon IO, Sherman JD, Leapman M. et al. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of gastrointestinal biopsies in a surgical pathology laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol 2021; 156: 540-549
- 25 Namburar S, von Renteln D, Damianos J. et al. Estimating the environmental impact of disposable endoscopic equipment and endoscopes. Gut 2022; 71: 1326-1331
- 26 Le NNT, Hernandez LV, Vakil N. et al. Environmental and health outcomes of single-use versus reusable duodenoscopes. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96: 1002-1008
- 27 Yong KK, He Y, Cheung HCA. et al. Rationalising the use of specimen pots following colorectal polypectomy: a small step towards greener endoscopy. Frontline Gastroenterol 2023; 14: 295-299
- 28 Lacroute J, Marcantoni J, Petitot S. et al. The carbon footprint of ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 918-926
- 29 López-Muñoz P, Martín-Cabezuelo R, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V. et al. Life cycle assessment of routinely used endoscopic instruments and simple intervention to reduce our environmental impact. Gut 2023; 72: 1692-1697
- 30 Zullo A, Chiovelli F, Esposito E. et al. Can gastric juice analysis with Endofaster® reduce the environmental impact of upper endoscopy?. Healthc Basel Switz 2023; 11: 3186
- 31 Henniger D, Windsheimer M, Beck H. et al. Assessment of the yearly carbon emission of a gastrointestinal endoscopy unit. Gut 2023; 72: 1816
- 32 Shiha MG, Nandi N, Hutchinson AJ. et al. Cost-benefits and environmental impact of the no-biopsy approach for the diagnosis of coeliac disease in adults. Frontline Gastroenterol 2024; 15: 95-98
- 33 Desai M, Campbell C, Perisetti A. et al. The environmental impact of gastrointestinal procedures: a prospective study of waste generation, energy consumption, and auditing in an endoscopy unit. Gastroenterology 2024; 166: 496-502.e3
- 34 Elli L, Mura SL, Rimondi A. et al. The carbon cost of inappropriate endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99: 137-145.e3
- 35 Ribeiro T, Morais R, Monteiro C. et al. Estimating the environmental impact of endoscopic activity at a tertiary center: a pilot study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 36: 39-44
- 36 Cho JH, Jin SY, Park S. Carbon footprint and cost reduction by endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia using narrow-band imaging. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39: 942-948
- 37 Pioche M, Neves JAC, Pohl H. et al. The environmental impact of small-bowel capsule endoscopy. Endoscopy 2024; 56: 737-746
- 38 Pioche M, Pohl H, Neves JAC. et al. Environmental impact of single-use versus reusable gastroscopes. Gut 2024; 73: 1816-1822
- 39 World Resources Institute. Greenhouse gas protocol, product life cycle accounting and reporting standard 2011. Accessed 27 Mar 2024: https://www.wri.org/research/greenhouse-gas-protocol-product-life-cycle-accounting-and-reporting-standard
- 40 Environmental Resources Management. Greenhouse gas accounting sector guidance for pharmaceutical products and medical devices 2012. Accessed 27 Mar 2024: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/tools/Summary-Document_Pharmaceutical-Product-and-Medical-Device-GHG Accounting_November-2012.pdf
- 41 Sustainable Healthcare Coalition. Care pathways: Guidance on appraising sustainability – Main document (Second edition). Accessed 27 Mar 2024: https://shcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Sustainable-Care-Pathways-Guidance-Main-Document-December-2023.pdf
- 42 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14044:2006 – Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Requirements and guidelines. Accessed 27 Mar 2024: https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html