Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ultrasound Int Open 2025; 11: a25377181
DOI: 10.1055/a-2537-7181
Original Article

Sonography-based determination of hip joint anterior head-neck offset is reliable and reproducible for CAM deformity assessment

Christian T. Schamberger
1   Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27178)
,
Arnold J. Suda 
2   University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN31567)
,
Tobias Grossner
1   Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27178)
,
Gerhard Schmidmaier
1   Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27178)
,
Stephan Stein
1   Clinic for Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN27178)
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose

Native X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT) are standard methods for determining head-neck offset (HNO) in femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI). Our hypothesis was that sonography-assisted determination of the offset in CAM deformity of the hip is a cheap, radiation-free, and reliable alternative to conventional alpha-angle determination.

Methods

Patients with hip pain and suspected CAM impingement who underwent anterior-longitudinal hip sonography according to DEGUM standard procedures and MRI were included in this single-center study between January 2015 and December 2019. Offset was determined three times on MRI and sonography by two independent investigators.

Results

285 patients were screened and 110 patients (49 females, 61 males) met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of investigation of 54 left and 56 right hip joints was 54.2 years. 1320 measurements were performed. No significant difference in HNO determination between MRI (6.11 mm+/–2.37) and sonography (5.93 mm+/–2.20) could be identified. The mean difference was 0.32 mm+/–0.32 mm (p>0.05) with a maximum deviation of 2.08 mm (outlier).

Conclusion

Sonography-assisted determination of head-neck offset is a reliable and reproducible method and is not inferior to determination with MRI. Sonography can be used initially as an alternative or additional tool for the qualitative determination of CAM deformity of the hip joint.

Keywords

ultrasound - hip - impingement - MR imaging


Publication History

Received: 17 July 2024

Accepted: 31 December 2024

Article published online:
24 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Christian T. Schamberger, Arnold J. Suda, Tobias Grossner, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Stephan Stein. Sonography-based determination of hip joint anterior head-neck offset is reliable and reproducible for CAM deformity assessment. Ultrasound Int Open 2025; 11: a25377181.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2537-7181
 

  • References

  • 1 Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M. et al. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 1012-1018
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M. et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 112-120
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Waldt S. Bildgebung des Hüftgelenks beim femoroazetabulären Impingement. Arthroskopie 2019; 32: 86-94
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Dienst M, Seil R, Godde S. et al. Effects of traction, distension, and joint position on distraction of the hip joint: an experimental study in cadavers. Arthroscopy 2002; 18: 865-871
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Rühmann O, Börner C, von Lewinski G. et al. Arthroskopische Behandlung von Verletzungen und degenerativen Läsionen des hyalinen Knorpels, Labrum acetabulare und Lig. capitis femoris. Arthroskopie 2006; 19: 59-66
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Clohisy JC, Baca G, Beaule PE. et al. Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a North American cohort of patients undergoing surgery. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 1348-1356
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Bohnsack M, Hehl S, Börner C. et al. Ergebnisse der Hüftarthroskopie. Arthroskopie 2006; 19: 46-50
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Lynch TS, Terry MA, Bedi A. et al. Hip arthroscopic surgery: patient evaluation, current indications, and outcomes. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41: 1174-1189
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Eijer H, Leunig M, Mahomed MN. et al. Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Screening of Anterior Femoral Head-Neck Offset in Patients with Femoro-Acetabular Impingement. HIP International 2001; 11: 37-41
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Jamali AA, Mak W, Wang P. et al. What is normal femoral head/neck anatomy? An analysis of radial CT reconstructions in adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 3581-3587
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Lerch S, Kasperczyk A, Warnecke J. et al. Evaluation of Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement by ultrasound. Int Orthop 2013; 37: 783-788
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Leunig M, Werlen S, Ungersböck A. et al. Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79: 230-234
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Heuck A, Dienst M, Glaser C. Femoroazetabuläres Impingement – Update 2019. Der Radiologe 2019; 59: 242-256
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Locher S, Werlen S, Leunig M. et al. [MR-Arthrography with radial sequences for visualization of early hip pathology not visible on plain radiographs]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002; 140: 52-57
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 15 Schamberger CT, Stein S, Gruber G, Suda AJ. Sonography-Based Determination of Hip Joint Anterior Alpha-Angle: A Reliable and Reproducible Method. Ultraschall Med 2023; 44: 188-193
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Konermann W, Gruber G, Gaa J Standardisierte sonographische Untersuchung des Hüftgelenkes. Ultraschall Med 2000; 21: 137-141
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 17 Gruber G, Schamberger C, Konermann W. Sonografie in Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Rheumatologie. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2018.
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 18 Amanatullah DF, Antkowiak T, Pillay K. et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: current concepts in diagnosis and treatment. Orthopedics 2015; 38: 185-199
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 19 Green SB. How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1991; 26: 499-510
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 20 Smith KM, Gerrie BJ, McCulloch PC. et al. Comparison of MRI, CT, Dunn 45 degrees and Dunn 90 degrees alpha angle measurements in femoroacetabular impingement. Hip Int 2018; 28: 450-455
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 21 Nakashima H, Tsukamoto M, Ohnishi Y. et al. Clinical and Radiographic Predictors for Unsalvageable Labral Tear at the Time of Initial Hip Arthroscopic Management for Femoroacetabular Impingement. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47: 2029-2037
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 22 Gruber G, Schamberger CT, Konermann W. et al. Hüftgelenk. Sonografie in Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Rheumatologie: Aktuelle Standardschnittebenen der DEGUM. 2018: 105-123
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 23 Nepple JJ, Lehmann CL, Ross JR. et al. Coxa profunda is not a useful radiographic parameter for diagnosing pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 417-423
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Lerch S, Kasperczyk A, Berndt T. et al. Ultrasound is as reliable as plain radiographs in the diagnosis of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016; 136: 1437-1443
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Maldonado DR, Chen JW, Walker-Santiago R. et al. Radiographic and Demographic Factors Can Predict the Need for Primary Labral Reconstruction in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Predictive Model Using 1398 Hips. Am J Sports Med 2020; 48: 173-180
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Conn KS, Villar RN. The torn acetabular labrum – a hip arthroscopist's view. Der Orthopäde 1998; 27: 699-703
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Farjo LA, Glick JM, Sampson TG. Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears. Arthroscopy 1999; 15: 132-137
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 28 Sadri H, Menetrey J, Kraus E. et al. Arthroskopische Behandlung des femoroazetabulären Impingements. Arthroskopie 2006; 19: 67-74
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Sampson T. Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement. American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, NJ) 2009; 37: 608-612
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 30 Sozen YV, Hepgur G, Kilicoglu O. et al. [The effectiveness of arthroscopic debridement and lavage treatment in osteoarthritis of the hip: preliminary results]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2004; 38: 96-103
    Search in Google Scholar