CC BY 4.0 · Int J Sports Med 2025; 46(06): 422-429
DOI: 10.1055/a-2526-9372
Training & Testing

Knee angle reproduction tests: influences of body orientation, movement direction and limb dominance

1   Exercise Physiology and Sports Medicine, Olympic Training Centre Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2   Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Hamburg Faculty of Education Psychology and Physical Science, Hamburg, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14915)
,
Abigail Preece
3   Institute of Movement and Neuroscience, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14926)
4   Institute of Exercise Training and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14926)
,
4   Institute of Exercise Training and Sport Informatics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14926)
,
3   Institute of Movement and Neuroscience, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14926)
5   Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14926)
6   German Research Centre of Elite Sport, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14926)
7   Centre for Health and Integrative Physiology in Space, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN14926)
› Author Affiliations
Registration number (trial ID): https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AFWRP (OSF-Open Science Framework), Trial registry: German Clinical Trials Register (https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de/), Type of Study: Prospective observational study.

Abstract

Applying joint position sense tests under different test conditions may introduce reproduction error bias, which can result in different therapeutic consequences. This study investigated the effects of body orientation, movement direction, and limb dominance on the active knee angle reproduction error. Subjects underwent active contralateral knee angle reproduction tests in a seated versus prone position, from a starting point of knee flexion versus knee extension, and with the dominant versus nondominant limb setting the target angle. The test order was randomly determined for each subject. The primary outcome was the absolute active knee angle reproduction error (°). The data of 54 healthy subjects (mean±standard deviation, age: 26±5 years, height: 174±11 cm, body mass: 69.9±14.4 kg, and Tegner activity score: 5.8±1.9) showed that the reproduction error was greater in the seated position than in the prone position. The use of the dominant limb as the reference limb was associated with significantly greater errors in the seated position, but not in the prone position. In conclusion, directly comparing the results obtained in the prone and seated positions is not recommended. However, the dominance of the reference limb might be relevant when testing patients and comparing healthy and injured knees.



Publication History

Received: 31 July 2024

Accepted after revision: 24 January 2025

Article published online:
20 February 2025

© 2025.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Han J, Waddington G, Adams R, Anson J, Liu Y. Assessing proprioception: A critical review of methods. J Sport Health Sci 2016; 5: 80-90
  • 2 Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing Proprioception: A Systematic Review of Possibilities. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 933-949
  • 3 Fleming JD, Ritzmann R, Centner C. Effect of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture on Knee Proprioception Within 2 Years After Conservative and Operative Treatment: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Sports Med 2022; 52: 1091-1102
  • 4 Molaee F, Shahmir M, Oliveira R. et al. Can acute mobilization and oscillation training profit on the joint position sense and strength of the rotator cuff muscles in young tennis players?. Retos 2024; 58: 534-545
  • 5 Lins CADA, Macedo LDB, Silveira RAG, Borges D.T., Brasileiro J.S. Influence of cryotherapy on balance and joint position sense in healthy subjects: randomized clinical trial. Man Ther Posturology Rehabil J 2015; 13: 1-6
  • 6 Smith TO, Davies L, Hing CB. A systematic review to determine the reliability of knee joint position sense assessment measures. Knee 2013; 20: 162-169
  • 7 Wieber J, Brandt J, Pieper M. et al. Effects of body orientation and direction of movement on a knee joint angle reproduction test in healthy subjects: An experimental study. Technol Health Care 2023; 31: 1567-1578
  • 8 Elangovan N, Herrmann A, Konczak J. Assessing Proprioceptive Function: Evaluating Joint Position Matching Methods Against Psychophysical Thresholds. Phys Ther 2014; 94: 553-561
  • 9 Lokhande MV, Shetye J, Mehta A, Deo MV. Assessment of Knee Joint Proprioception in Weight Bearing and in Non-Weight Bearing Positions in Normal Subjects. JKIMSU 2013; 2: 94-101
  • 10 Suner-Keklik S, Cobanoglu-Seven G, Kafa N, Ugurlu M., Guzel NA. The Validity and Reliability of Knee Proprioception Measurement Performed With Inclinometer in Different Positions. J Sport Rehabil 2017; 26: 1-18
  • 11 Vila-Chã C, Riis S, Lund D, Møller A, Farina D, Falla D. Effect of unaccustomed eccentric exercise on proprioception of the knee in weight and non-weight bearing tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2011; 21: 141-147
  • 12 Naseri N, Pourkazemi F. Difference in knee joint position sense in athletes with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20: 2071-2076
  • 13 Birmingham TB, Kramer JF, Inglis JT. et al. Effect of a Neoprene Sleeve on Knee Joint Position Sense During Sitting Open Kinetic Chain and Supine Closed Kinetic Chain Tests. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 562-566
  • 14 Clark NC, Akins JS, Heebner NR. et al. Reliability and measurement precision of concentric-to-isometric and eccentric-to-isometric knee active joint position sense tests in uninjured physically active adults. Phys Ther in Sport 2016; 18: 38-45
  • 15 Relph N, Herrington L. Interexaminer, Intraexaminer, and Test-Retest Reliability of Clinical Knee Joint-Position-Sense Measurements Using an Image-Capture Technique. J Sport Rehabil 2015; 24: 2013-0134
  • 16 Olsson L, Lund H, Henriksen M. et al. Test–retest reliability of a knee joint position sense measurement method in sitting and prone position. Adv Physiother 2004; 6: 37-47
  • 17 Wilke C, Froböse I. Quantifizierung propriozeptiver Leistungen von Kniegelenken. Dtsch Z Sportmed 2003; 2: 9-12
  • 18 Mir SM, Hadian M-R, Talebian S, Nasseri N. Functional assessment of knee joint position sense following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 300-303
  • 19 Relph N, Herrington L. The effects of knee direction, physical activity and age on knee joint position sense. Knee 2016; 23: 393-398
  • 20 Larsen R, Lund H, Christensen R, Røgind H., Danneskiold-Samsøe B., Bliddal H. Effect of static stretching of quadriceps and hamstring muscles on knee joint position sense. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 43-46
  • 21 Azevedo J, Rodrigues S, Seixas A. The influence of sports practice, dominance and gender on the knee joint position sense. Knee 2021; 28: 117-123
  • 22 Voight ML, Hardin JA, Blackburn TA, Tippett S., Canner G.C. The Effects of Muscle Fatigue on and the Relationship of Arm Dominance to Shoulder Proprioception. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 23: 348-352
  • 23 Cug M, Wikstrom EA, Golshaei B, Kirazci S. The Effects of Sex, Limb Dominance, and Soccer Participation on Knee Proprioception and Dynamic Postural Control. J Sport Rehabil 2016; 25: 31-39
  • 24 Galamb K, Szilágyi B, Magyar O. et al. Effects of side-dominance on knee joint proprioceptive target-matching asymmetries. Acta Physiol Hung 2018; 105: 257-265
  • 25 Busch A, Blasimann A, Mayer F, Baur H. Alterations in sensorimotor function after ACL reconstruction during active joint position sense testing. A systematic review. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0253503
  • 26 Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M. et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453-1457
  • 27 Deshpande N, Connelly DM, Culham EG, Costigan PA. Reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 883-889
  • 28 Gonzales TI, Goble DJ. Short-Term Adaptation of Joint Position Sense Occurs during and after Sustained Vibration of Antagonistic Muscle Pairs. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 896
  • 29 Hancock GE, Hepworth T, Wembridge K. Accuracy and reliability of knee goniometry methods. J Exp Ortop 2018; 5: 46
  • 30 Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Joo H. Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers. Organ Res Methods 2013; 16: 270-301
  • 31 Gokeler A, Benjaminse A, Hewett TE. et al. Proprioceptive deficits after ACL injury: are they clinically relevant. Br J Sports Med 2012; 46: 180-192
  • 32 Wieber J, Müller-Rahmel L, Reer R, Rein R, Braunstein B. Factors that influence the angular error in active knee angle reproduction tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Exp Orthop 2024; 11: e12091
  • 33 Busch A, Bangerter C, Mayer F, Baur H. Reliability of the active knee joint position sense test and influence of limb dominance and sex. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 152
  • 34 Schorderet C, Hilfiker R, Allet L. The role of the dominant leg while assessing balance performance. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture 2021; 84: 66-78
  • 35 Strong A, Grip H, Arumugam A, Boraxbekk CJ, Selling J, Häger CK. Right hemisphere brain lateralization for knee proprioception among right-limb dominant individuals. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17: 969101
  • 36 Worringham CJ, Stelmach GE. The contribution of gravitational torques to limb position sense. Exp Brain Res 1985; 61: 38-42
  • 37 Wakeling JM, Uehli K, Rozitis AI. Muscle fibre recruitment can respond to the mechanics of the muscle contraction. J R Soc Interface 2006; 3: 533-544
  • 38 Proske U, Gandevia SC. The Proprioceptive Senses: Their Roles in Signaling Body Shape, Body Position and Movement, and Muscle Force. Physiol Rev 2012; 92: 1651-1697
  • 39 Macefield VG, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Goulding N, Palma JA., Fuente Mora C, Kaufmann H. Increasing cutaneous afferent feedback improves proprioceptive accuracy at the knee in patients with sensory ataxia. J Neurophysiol 2016; 115: 711-716
  • 40 Stone KD, Keizer A, Dijkerman HC. The influence of vision, touch, and proprioception on body representation of the lower limbs. Acta Psychol 2018; 185: 22-32
  • 41 Liu JZ, Kubo M, Aoki H, Liu N, Kou PH, Suzuki T. A Study on the Difference of Human Sensation Evaluation to Whole-body Vibration in Sitting and Lying Postures. J Physiol Anthropol 1995; 14: 219-226
  • 42 Naito E, Roland PE, Grefkes C. et al. Dominance of the Right Hemisphere and Role of Area 2 in Human Kinesthesia. J Neurophysiol 2005; 93: 1020-1034
  • 43 Goble DJ. Proprioceptive Acuity Assessment Via Joint Position Matching: From Basic Science to General Practice. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 1176-1184
  • 44 Vulliemoz S, Raineteau O, Jabaudon D. Reaching beyond the midline: why are human brains cross wired?. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 87-99
  • 45 Naughton J, Adams R, Maher C. Discriminating Overhead Points of Contact after Arm Raising. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 95: 1187-1195
  • 46 Roy EA, MacKenzie C. Handedness Effects in Kinesthetic Spatial Location Judgements. Cortex 1978; 14: 250-258
  • 47 Han J, Anson J, Waddington G, Adams R. Proprioceptive performance of bilateral upper and lower limb joints: side-general and site-specific effects. Exp Brain Res 2013; 226: 313-323
  • 48 Bullock-Saxton JE, Wong WJ, Hogan N. The influence of age on weight-bearing joint reposition sense of the knee. Exp Brain Res 2001; 136: 400-406
  • 49 Van Melick N, Meddeler BM, Hoogeboom TJ, Nijhuis-van der Sanden M, van Cingel R. How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0189876
  • 50 Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Classic Papers in Orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985. 198. 43-49