Standardized measurement of the piriformis muscle and the proximal portion of the sacral nerve roots using transvaginal ultrasound

Abstract

Objective

To identify the sonomorphological appearance and to measure the thickness of the piriformis muscle (PM) and the proximal portion of the sacral nerve roots S1–S3 in healthy premenopausal women.

Materials and Methods

This prospective multicentric observational study included a consecutive series of women undergoing transvaginal sonography (TVS) at 2 tertiary gynecological referral centers. Standardized assessment of the pelvic organs was performed, followed by an attempt to visualize the right and left PM and sacral nerve roots S1–S3 at their origin in proximity to the sacral neuroforamen. Visualization rates, diameters of the muscle and nerve thickness, and the time needed to identify the PM were recorded.

Results

305 patients were included in the study. In 293 women (96.1%), the PM was identified bilaterally. The median diameter of the PM was 18.3mm on the right side and 18.4mm on the left side. S1 nerve roots were successfully identified bilaterally in 224 (73.4%) patients. Their right and left median diameters were 4.8mm. Both S2 nerves were successfully identified in 215 (70.5%) patients. Their median diameter were 4.3mm on both sides. S3 nerve roots were successfully identified in 203 (66.6%) patients. Their median diameter were 3.2mm on both sides.

Conclusion

We describe methods which allow consistent and rapid identification of the PM and the S1–S3 sacral nerve roots using TVS. Visualization of the PM and the proximal portion of the sacral plexus may be useful regarding identification of pathological changes in PM thickness and could help to distinguish perineural cysts from other gynecological pathologies.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel

Beschreibung der sonomorphologischen Merkmale wie auch die standardisierte Messung des Durchmessers des Musculus piriformis (PM) und der proximalen Anteile der Sakralnerven-Wurzel (SNW) S1–S3 bei prämenopausalen Frauen.

Material und Methoden

Diese prospektive Beobachtungsstudie umfasste konsekutiv untersuchte Patientinnen an 2 tertiären gynäkologischen Referenzzentren. Nach standardisierter Beurteilung der Beckenorgane wurde versucht, beide PM, deren Durchmesser und die proximalen Anteile der SNW S1–S3 an ihrem Ursprung in der Nähe des Sakral-Neuroforamens transvaginalsonografisch (TVS) darzustellen.

Ergebnisse

Von 305 Patientinnen wurde der PM bei 293 Patientinnen (96,1%) beidseitig detektiert. Der mediane Durchmesser des rechten PM betrug 18,3mm und des linken PM 18,4mm. Die S1-Nervenwurzel (NW) wurde beidseitig bei 224/305 (73,4%) Patientinnen erfolgreich identifiziert. Der mediane Durchmesser der S1-NW betrug an beiden Seiten 4,8mm. Beide S2-NW wurden bei 215/305 (70,5%) Patientinnen erfolgreich identifiziert. Der mediane Durchmesser der S2-NW betrug 4,3mm an beiden Seiten. Schließlich wurden bei 203/305 (66,6%) Patientinnen S3-NW erfolgreich identifiziert. Der mediane Durchmesser der S3-NW betrug 3,2mm an beiden Seiten.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Identifizierung des PM durch TVS ist allermeist möglich; mit obig angegebenen Referenzwerten der PM-Dicke. Die SNW S1–S3 können bei der Mehrheit der Patientinnen mittels TVS an ihrem Ursprung identifiziert werden. Die Visualisierung des PM und des proximalen Anteils des Plexus Sacralis ist bei pathologischen Veränderungen des PM oder der Differenzialdiagnose von Adnex-Tumoren und Perineural-Zysten von Bedeutung.

Keywords

piriformis muscle - sacral nerve roots - deep endometriosis - transvaginal sonography - pelvic anatomy

• References

• 1 Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I. et al. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 64: 129-144
• 2 Metzler JM, Finger L, Burkhardt T. et al. Systematic, noninvasive endometriosis diagnosis in transvaginal sonography by the Swiss Society of Ultrasound in Medicine. Ultraschall in Med 2024; 45: 367-388
• 3 Gerges B, Li W, Leonardi M. et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the optimal imaging modality for the detection of uterosacral ligaments/torus uterinus, rectovaginal septum and vaginal deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2021; 2021 (04) hoab041
• 4 Xholli A, Londero AP, Cavalli E. et al. The Benefit of Transvaginal Elastography in Detecting Deep Endometriosis: A Feasibility Study. Ultraschall in Med 2024; 45: 69-76
• 5 Szabó G, Madár I, Rigó Jr J. et al. A novel complementary method for ultrasonographic screening of deep endometriosis: a case series of 5 patients diagnosed with transvaginal strain elastography. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2022; 49 (01) 1
• 6 Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T. et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 318-332
• 7 Guerriero S, Condous G, Rolla M. et al. Addendum to consensus opinion from International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 64: 275-280
• 8 Szabó G, Madár I, Hudelist G. et al. Visualization of sacral nerve roots and sacral plexus on gynecological transvaginal ultrasound: feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62: 290-299
• 9 Szabó G, Bokor A, Fancsovits V. et al. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of deep endometriosis affecting sacral plexus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 64: 104-111
• 10 Acosta Jr FL, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Schmidt MH. et al. Diagnosis and management of sacral Tarlov cysts. Case report and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15: E15
• 11 Ahmadi F, Akhbari F. Adnexal masses or perineural (tarlov) cysts? Differentiation by imaging techniques: A case report. Int J Reprod Biomed 2017; 15: 589-592
• 12 Murphy K, Nasralla M, Pron G. et al. Management of Tarlov cysts: an uncommon but potentially serious spinal column disease-review of the literature and experience with over 1000 referrals. Neuroradiology 2024; 66: 1-30
• 13 Chung JS, Kwak HD, Ju JK. Laparoscopic approach in the surgical treatment of large retrorectal tumors: a short-term experience at a single tertiary center case series in Korea. J Minim Invasive Surg 2024; 27: 221-226
• 14 Boyajian-O’Neill LA, McClain RL, Coleman MK. et al. Diagnosis and management of piriformis syndrome: an osteopathic approach. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2008; 108: 657-664
• 15 Shah SS, Consuegra JM, Subhawong TK. et al. Epidemiology and etiology of secondary piriformis syndrome: A single-institution retrospective study. J Clin Neurosci 2019; 59: 209-212
• 16 Poutoglidou F, Piagkou M, Totlis T. et al. Sciatic Nerve Variants and the Piriformis Muscle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2020; 12: e11531
• 17 Hopayian K, Song F, Riera R. et al. The clinical features of the piriformis syndrome: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 2095-2109
• 18 Al-Al-Shaikh M, Michel F, Parratte B. et al. An MRI evaluation of changes in piriformis muscle morphology induced by botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. Diagn Interv Imaging 2015; 96: 37-43
• 19 Filler AG, Haynes J, Jordan S. Sciatica of nondisc origin and piriformis syndrome: diagnosis by magnetic resonance neurography and interventional magnetic resonance imaging with outcome study of resulting treatment. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 2: 99-115
• 20 Bharadwaj UU, Varenika V, Carson W. et al. Variant Sciatic Nerve Anatomy in Relation to the Piriformis Muscle on Magnetic Resonance Neurography: A Potenzial Etiology for Extraspinal Sciatica. Tomography 2023; 9: 475-484
• 21 Hernando MF, Cerezal L, Perez-Carro L. et al. Deep gluteal syndrome: anatomy, imaging, and management of sciatic nerve entrapments in the subgluteal space. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44: 919-934
• 22 Guner D, Ozcete ZA. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Dry Needling Therapy and Exercise in Piriformis Muscle Syndrome. Cureus 2023; 15: e43804
• 23 Wu YY, Guo XY, Chen K. et al. Feasibility and Reliability of an Ultrasound Examination to Diagnose Piriformis Syndrome. World Neurosurg 2020; 134: e1085-e92
• 24 Siahaan YMT, Tiffani P, Tanasia A. Ultrasound-Guided Measurement of Piriformis Muscle Thickness to Diagnose Piriformis Syndrome. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 721966
• 25 Fischerova D, Santos G, Wong L. et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (26): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of benign retroperitoneal pelvic nerve sheath tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62: 727-738
• 26 Fischerova D, Culcasi C, Gatti E. et al. Ultrasound assessment of the pelvic sidewall: methodological consensus opinion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024;
• 27 Keckstein J, Hoopmann M. Endometriosis, ultrasound and #Enzian classification: the need for a common language for non-invasive diagnostics. Ultraschall in Med 2023; 44: 233-239