RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/a-2508-0563
The Impact of Extended Procedure Duration on Nasal Morbidity after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Resection of Pituitary Macroadenomas
Abstract
Objective Nasal mucosa is susceptible to injury during endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas. Prolonged operative times may lead to increased instrumentation-induced injury to nasal mucosa. Influence of operative time on sinonasal morbidity has not been reported previously. Our objective is to determine preoperative drivers extending operative time and the impact of prolonged endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection on nasal morbidity as measured by postoperative SNOT-22 questionnaire.
Study Design SNOT-22 scores were collected at each rhinology visit and intraoperative OR start and stop timestamps as recorded by nursing staff were extracted from the record.
Setting Cases of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection at a tertiary care center were identified.
Methods Multivariable regression was done analyzing factors influencing SNOT-22 scores and surgical time.
Results The study included 222 patients. Median preoperative SNOT-22 score was 12.5 (IQR 4.00, 24.25) and median postoperative SNOT-22 score was 9 (IQR 2.00, 19.25), indicating overall improvement at 6 months. Median procedure duration was 200.4 minutes (IQR 164, 249). Multivariable regression of SNOT-22 showed only history of sinus surgery caused increased sinonasal morbidity (p = 0.05). Factors including tumor size (p = 0.01), surgical approach (p = 0.01), and reconstruction technique (p = 0.01) most significantly increased operative time.
Conclusion Only a history of prior sinus surgery was associated with increased nasal morbidity. Tumor size, functional tumors, surgical approach, reconstructive technique, and subtotal resection all prolonged operative time. Surgeons should consider counseling patients meeting these criteria on potential risk of increased morbidity and increased operative time with endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 09. April 2024
Angenommen: 20. Dezember 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
24. Dezember 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Januar 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 McMains KC. Safety in endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 16 (03) 247-251
- 2 Zeifer B. Sinusitis: postoperative changes and surgical complications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2002; 23 (06) 475-491
- 3 Zheng J, Sun Y, Dong Z, Yang Z. [The injury of nasal mucosa in transnasal endoscopic sinus surgery by light and heat]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 2003; 17 (11) 670-671
- 4 Kelly PD, Fanning JB, Drolet B. Operating room time as a limited resource: ethical considerations for allocation. J Med Ethics 2022; 48 (01) 14-18
- 5 Farrell CJ, Nyquist GG, Farag AA, Rosen MR, Evans JJ. Principles of pituitary surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2016; 49 (01) 95-106
- 6 Tomazic PV, Hammer GP, Gerstenberger C, Koele W, Stammberger H. Heat development at nasal endoscopes' tips: danger of tissue damage? A laboratory study. Laryngoscope 2012; 122 (08) 1670-1673
- 7 Lee A, Sommer D, Reddy K, Murty N, Gunnarsson T. Endoscopic transnasal approach to the craniocervical junction. Skull Base 2010; 20 (03) 199-205
- 8 Champagne C, Ballivet de Régloix S, Genestier L, Crambert A, Maurin O, Pons Y. Endoscopic vs. conventional septoplasty: a review of the literature. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016; 133 (01) 43-46
- 9 Bhenswala PN, Schlosser RJ, Nguyen SA, Munawar S, Rowan NR. Sinonasal quality-of-life outcomes after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9 (10) 1105-1118
- 10 Rudmik L, Soler ZM, Mace JC, DeConde AS, Schlosser RJ, Smith TL. Using preoperative SNOT-22 score to inform patient decision for endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (07) 1517-1522
- 11 Singh D, Cai L, Watt D, Scoggins E, Wald S, Nazerali R. Improving operating room efficiency through reducing first start delays in an academic center. J Healthc Qual 2023; 45 (05) 308-313
- 12 Saul B, Ketelaar E, Yaish A. et al. Assessing root causes of First Case On-Time Start (FCOTS) delay in the orthopedic department at a busy level II community teaching hospital. Spartan Med Res J 2022; 7 (02) 36719
- 13 Daniels AH, Daher M, Singh M. et al; International Spine Study Group. The case for operative efficiency in adult spinal deformity surgery: impact of operative time on complications, length of stay, alignment, fusion rates, and patient-reported outcomes. Spine 2024; 49 (05) 313-320
- 14 Passias PG, Poorman GW, Vasquez-Montes D. et al; International Spine Study Group. Predictive analytics for determining extended operative time in corrective adult spinal deformity surgery. Int J Spine Surg 2022; 16 (02) 291-299
- 15 Dedhia RC, Lord CA, Pinheiro-Neto CD. et al. Endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery: impact of surgical education on operation length and patient morbidity. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2012; 73 (06) 405-409
- 16 Hughes JD, Koeller K, Rinaldo L. et al. Beyond gross total and subtotal: does volumetric resection matter in nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas?. World Neurosurg 2018; 116: e733-e737