Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2487-5111
Best Practice Guidelines – DEGUM Recommendations on Breast Ultrasound
Part III/2 – Special Clinical Indications Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Abstract
Breast ultrasound has been established for many years as an important method in addition to mammography for clarifying breast findings. The goal of the Best Practice Guidelines Part III of the DEGUM breast ultrasound working group is to provide colleagues working in senology with information regarding the specific medical indications for breast ultrasound in addition to the current ultrasound criteria and assessment categories published in part I and the additional and optional sonographic diagnostic methods described in part II. The value of breast ultrasound for specific indications including follow-up, evaluation of breast implants, diagnostic workup of dense breast tissue, diagnostic workup during pregnancy and lactation, and the diagnostic workup of breast findings in men is discussed. Each section after the general information section contains a description of specific pathologies, followed by a short summary and DEGUM recommendations for the particular indications. The latest S3 guidelines and AGO guidelines were taken into consideration.
Publication History
Received: 13 March 2024
Accepted after revision: 05 October 2024
Article published online:
14 January 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1
Wojcinski S,
Cassel M,
Farrokh A.
et al. Variations in the Elasticity of Breast Tissue During the Menstrual Cycle Determined
by Real-time Sonography. J. Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (01) 63-72
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Russo I,
Medado J,
Russo J.
Endocrine influences on the mammary gland. In:
Jones TC,
Mohr U,
Hunt RD.
(eds) Integumenz and Mammary Glands. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1989: 252-266
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Stavros AT.
Breast Anatomy: The Basis for Understanding Sonography. In Breast Ultrasound. Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins; 2004: 56-108
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Ahn BY,
Kim HH,
Moon WK.
et al. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: Mammographic and sonographic
findings. J. Ultrasound Med 2003; 22 (05) 491-497
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Petrek JA.
Breast Cancer during Pregnancy. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1994; 74 (Suppl. 01) 518-527
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Smith LH,
Danielsen B,
Allen ME.
et al. Cancer associated with obstetric delivery: results of linkage with the California
cancer registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (04) 1128-1135
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Van Calsteren K,
Amant F.
Cancer during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014; 93 (05) 443-446
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Woo JC,
Yu T,
Hurd TC.
Breast cancer in pregnancy:a literature review. Arch Surg 2003; 138 (01) 91-98
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Nettleton J,
Long J,
Kuban D.
et al. Breast cancer during pregnancy: quantifying the risk of treatment delay. Obstet
Gynecol 1996; 87 (03) 414-418
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Samuels TH,
Liu FF,
Yaffe M.
et al. Gestational breast cancer. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998; 49 (03) 172-180
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Wojcinski S,
Stefanidou N,
Hillemanns P.
et al. The biology of malignant breast tumors has an impact on the presentation in
ultrasound: an analysis of 315 cases. BMC Womens Health 2013; 13: 47
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Wojcinski S,
Soliman AA,
Schmidt J.
et al. Sonographic features of triple-negative and non-triple-negative breast cancer.
J. Ultrasound Med 2012; 31 (10) 1531-1541
MissingFormLabel
- 13 Pharmakovigilanz- und Beratungszentrum für Embryonaltoxikologie. Embryotox – Arzneimittelsicherheit
in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit. 2023 https://www.embryotox.de/
MissingFormLabel
- 14 Rote Liste Service GmbH. Fachinfo-Service. 2003 https://www.fachinfo.de/
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Lattin GE Jr,
Jesinger RA,
Mattu R.
et al. From the radiologic pathology archives: diseases of the male breast: radiologic-pathologic
correlation. Radiographics 2013; 33 (02) 461-489
MissingFormLabel
- 16 https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kid_2023/kid_2023_c50_brust.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Niell BL,
Lourenco AP,
Moy L.
Expert Panel on Breast Imaging.
et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Evaluation of the Symptomatic Male Breast. J Am
Coll Radiol 2018; 15 (Suppl. 11) S313-S320
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Kuhne HP,
Egler S,
Lenz S.
et al. Gynecomastia in German Soldiers: etiology and pathology. GMS Interdiscip Plast
Reconstr Surg DGPW 2012; 1: Doc03
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Gochhait D,
Dehuri P,
Umamahesweran S.
et al. Breast Abscess Mimicking Breast Carcinoma in Male. J Midlife Health 2018; 9
(01) 39-40
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Giordano SH.
A review of the diagnosis and management of male breast cancer. Oncologist 2005; 10
(07) 471-479
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Rolfes M,
Borde J,
Möllenhoff K.
et al. Prevalence of Cancer Predisposition Germline Variants in Male Breast Cancer
Patients: Results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14 (13) 3292
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Berg WA,
Bandos AI,
Mendelson EB.
et al. Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN
6666. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 108 (04) djv367
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Ohuchi N,
Suzuki A,
Sobue T.
et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to
screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START):
a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 387: 341-348
MissingFormLabel