RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2473-5906
Update zum Larynxorganerhalt bei fortgeschrittenen Larynx-/Hypopharynxkarzinomen
Update on Larynx Organ Preservation in locally advanced Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal CarcinomaAuthors

Die Therapie von fortgeschrittenen Larynx- und Hypopharynxkarzinomen ist nicht nur aufgrund hoher Rezidivraten unverändert eine große Herausforderung für die behandelnden Ärzte. Sollte eine komplette Kehlkopfentfernung (Laryngektomie) indiziert sein, stehen zwei nicht-chirurgische Konzepte mit dem Ziel des Larynxorganerhalts zur Auswahl: simultane Radiochemotherapie oder Induktionschemotherapie gefolgt von Bestrahlung.
Abstract
The management of locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas remains challenging for ENT specialists due to the larynx’s complex multidimensional function and the high rates of local and locoregional recurrence or distant metastatis. Surgical (including total laryngectomy, LE, followed by adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy) and nonsurgical approaches aiming on larynx organ preservation (including definitive concomitant chemoradiation or sequential induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy) are available. These treatment modalities will be critically discussed in this review.
In line with the national German S3 guidelines for laryngeal and oro-/hypopharyngeal cancer, patients must receive comprehensive counseling on both surgical and non surgical concepts. To date, early response to IC constitutes the most robust surrogate marker for organ preservation candidacy, guiding the early redirection of non responders to upfront LE. Late salvage LE after definitive radiochemotherapy is associated with high perioperative morbidity, often rendered unfeasible due to radiation-induced fibrosis and impaired vascularity; thus, it should not be considered as a standard treatment option.
IC and response evaluation after just one cycle of IC, as applied in the DeLOS-II study, allow for early identification of non-responders, for whom LE (associated with significantly lower complication rates than salvage surgery) should be recommended prior to radiotherapy. The neoadjuvant use of immunotherapy in combination with IC likely represents the next frontier in the context of laryngeal organ preservation. The ongoing ELOS study is currently investigating the efficacy of an IC regimen comprising docetaxel and cisplatin in combination with pembrolizumab.
-
Die deutschen S3-Leitlinien empfehlen bei fortgeschrittenem Larynx-/Hypopharynxkarzinom 3 Therapiekonzepte: 1. Tumorresektion gefolgt von adjuvanter Radio(chemo)therapie, 2. primäre Radiochemotherapie oder 3. Induktionschemotherapie gefolgt von Bestrahlung.
-
Entsprechend retrospektiven Datenanalysen ist ein primär chirurgisches Vorgehen gefolgt von postoperativer Radio(chemo)therapie hinsichtlich der lokoregionären Kontrolle und des Gesamtüberlebens von Patienten mit T4a-Karzinomen des Larynx und Hypopharynx einem primär nicht-chirurgischen Vorgehen überlegen.
-
Eine gute und frühzeitige Patientenselektion sollte eine Salvage-Chirurgie nach Möglichkeit im Vorfeld vermeiden, da sie insbesondere mehr als 3 Monate nach voller Bestrahlungsdosis aufgrund der Gewebsveränderungen chirurgisch herausfordernd und mit hohen Komplikationsraten (Fisteln, Wundheilungsstörungen) verbunden ist.
-
Außer zum Zweck der Selektion zwischen Laryngektomie und Larynxorganerhalt vor geplanter definitiver Radio- oder Radiochemotherapie wird bei fortgeschrittenen Larynx-/Hypopharynxkarzinomen derzeit eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie nicht empfohlen.
-
Eine möglichst frühe Response-Evaluation im Rahmen einer Induktionschemotherapie ermöglicht die Selektion von Patienten, die mit größerer Wahrscheinlichkeit einen dauerhaften Larynxorganerhalt erreichen können. Patienten mit unzureichendem Ansprechen können frühestmöglich einer Laryngektomie ohne radiogen bedingte Komplikationen zugeführt werden.
-
Die Anwendung von Immuncheckpoint-Inhibitoren ab dem neoadjuvanten Setting erscheint vielversprechend.
Schlüsselwörter
Larynx-Organerhalt - Induktionschemotherapie - Checkpoint-Inhibitoren - Laryngektomie - Salvage-Chirurgie - ELOS - Larynxkarzinom - Hypopharynxkarzinom - TherapieentscheidungKeywords
larynx and hypopharynx cancer - induction chemotherapy - larynx organ preservation - laryngectomy - checkpoint inhibition - salvage surgeryPublikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. Oktober 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Larynxkarzinoms, Langversion 1.1, 2019, AWMF-Registernummer: 017/076OL. Zugriff am 15. April 2025 unter: http://www.leitlinienprogrammonkologie.de/leitlinien/larynxkarzinom/
- 2 Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF): S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie, Prävention und Nachsorge des Oro- und Hypopharynxkarzinoms, Langversion 1.0, 2024, AWMF-Registernummer: 017-082OL. Zugriff am 15. April 2025 unter: https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/oro-undhypopharynxkarzinom
- 3 Wolf GT, Fisher SG, Hong WK. et al. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 1991; 324: 1685-1690
- 4 Wolf GT. Reexamining the treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer: the VA laryngeal cancer study revisited. Head Neck 2010; 32: 7-14
- 5 Luckhaupt H. History of laryngeal and tracheal surgery in the 19th century. Laryngorhinootologie 2000; 79: 657-658
- 6 Rettinger G, Hosemann W, Hüttenbrink KB. et al. , Hrsg. HNO-Operationslehre: Mit allen wichtigen Eingriffen. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2018
- 7 Gößler UR. Traditional transcutaneous approaches in head & neck surgery. Laryngorhinootologie 2012; 91 (Suppl. 01) S63-S85
- 8 Céruse P, Albert S, Baujat B. et al. 2023: First laryngeal transplantation in France by the „ECLAT“ group!. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2024; 141: 1-2
- 9 Zacharias SR, Grandjean D, Stearns E. et al. Strategic Development of a Larynx and Trachea Transplantation Program: The Mayo Clinic Arizona Experience. Clin Transplant 2025; 39: e70126
- 10 Debry C, Dupret-Bories A, Vrana NE. et al. Laryngeal replacement with an artificial larynx after total laryngectomy: the possibility of restoring larynx functionality in the future. Head Neck 2014; 36: 1669-1673
- 11 Grover S, Swisher-McClure S, Mitra N. et al. Total Laryngectomy Versus Larynx Preservation for T4a Larynx Cancer: Patterns of Care and Survival Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92: 594-601
- 12 Timmermans AJ, van Dijk, Boukje AC. et al. Trends in treatment and survival for advanced laryngeal cancer: A 20-year population-based study in The Netherlands. Head Neck 2016; 38 (Suppl. 01) E1247-E1255
- 13 Sanabria A, Chaves AL, Kowalski LP. et al. Organ preservation with chemoradiation in advanced laryngeal cancer: The problem of generalizing results from randomized controlled trials. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017; 44: 18-25
- 14 Forastiere AA, Weber RS, Trotti A. Organ Preservation for Advanced Larynx Cancer: Issues and Outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33: 3262-3268
- 15 Rosenthal DI, Mohamed AS, Weber RS. et al. Long-term outcomes after surgical or nonsurgical initial therapy for patients with T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: A 3-decade survey. Cancer 2015; 121: 1608-1619
- 16 Stokes WA, Jones BL, Bhatia S. et al. A comparison of overall survival for patients with T4 larynx cancer treated with surgical versus organ-preservation approaches: A National Cancer Data Base analysis. Cancer 2017; 123: 600-608
- 17 Pfuetzenreiter EG, JRFerreron GF, Sadka JZ. et al. Total laryngectomy vs. non-surgical organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer: a metanalysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 90: 101404
- 18 Dyckhoff G, Warta R, Herold-Mende C. et al. Larynx preservation up to T4 laryngeal cancer?. HNO 2022; 70: 595-600
- 19 Lefebvre JL, Chevalier D, Luboinski B. et al. Larynx preservation in pyriform sinus cancer: preliminary results of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial. EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 890-899
- 20 Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M. et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2091-2098
- 21 Forastiere AA, Zhang Q, Weber RS. et al. Long-term results of RTOG 91–11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 845-852
- 22 Licitra L, Bonomo P, Sanguineti G. et al. Different View on Larynx Preservation Evidence-Based Treatment Recommendations. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 1376-1377
- 23 Dietz A, Wiegand S, Kuhnt T. et al. Laryngeal Preservation Approaches: Considerations for New Selection Criteria Based on the DeLOS-II Trial. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 625
- 24 Lefebvre J-L, Ang KK. Larynx preservation clinical trial design: Key issues and recommendations--a consensus panel summary. Head Neck 2009; 31: 429-441
- 25 Pignon JP, Le Maître A, Maillard E. et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 2009; 92: 4-14
- 26 Lacas B, Carmel A, Landais C. et al. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group. Radiother Oncol 2021; 156: 281-293
- 27 Bourhis J, Sire C, Graff P. et al. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC 99–02): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 145-153
- 28 Beckmann GK, Hoppe F, Pfreundner L. et al. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in combination with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2005; 27: 36-43
- 29 Dietz A, Eckel H, deVries A. et al. Non-surgical organ preservation and new technologies in laryngeal radiation. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1494854
- 30 Sanabria A, Kowalski LP, Shaha AR. et al. Salvage surgery for head and neck cancer: a plea for better definitions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 271: 1347-1350
- 31 van der Putten L, Bree R de, Doornaert PA. et al. Salvage surgery in post-chemoradiation laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma: outcome and review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2015; 35: 162-172
- 32 Benjamin WJ, Feng AL, Heft Neal M. et al. Utility of bioselection with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for organ preservation in patients with T4 laryngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2024; 156: 106917
- 33 Grégoire V, Lefebvre JL, Licitra L. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2010; 21: v184-v186
- 34 Machiels JP, René Leemans C, Golusinski W. et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx: EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2020; 31: 1462-1475
- 35 Dietz A, Wichmann G, Kuhnt T. et al. Induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy (RT) versus cetuximab plus IC and RT in advanced laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer resectable only by total laryngectomy-final results of the larynx organ preservation trial DeLOS-II. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: 2105-2114
- 36 Wichmann G, Wald T, Pirlich M. et al. Improved survival of locoregional-advanced larynx and hypopharynx cancer patients treated according to the DeLOS-II protocol. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1394691
- 37 Wichmann G, Wald T, Zebralla V. et al. Superior 125-month outcome through cetuximab in the larynx organ preservation trial DeLOS-II: a single study center’s experience. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1506840
- 38 Ferris RL, Blumenschein Jr. G, Fayette J. et al. Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1856-1867
- 39 Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R. et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019; 394: 1915-1928
- 40 Dietz A, Stöhr M, Zebralla V. et al. Immuno oncology treatment in head and neck cancer. Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 100: 303-321
- 41 Wiegand S, Wichmann G, Dietz A. Perspectives of Induction With Chemo and/or Immune Check Point Inhibition in Head and Neck Organ Preservation Treatment. Front Oncol 2019; 9: 191
- 42 Ferrarotto R, Johnson FM, Hutcheson KA. et al. Immuno-chemotherapy as single treatment modality for larynx preservation (ICoLP): Co-primary endpoints and safety results. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41: 6008
- 43 Pan Y, Li H, Zhu M. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for laryngeal preservation in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 142: 113197
- 44 Wichmann G, Wald T, Pirlich M. et al. The European Larynx Organ Preservation Study MK-3475-C44. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1433238
- 45 Uppaluri R, Campbell KM, Egloff AM. et al. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resectable Locally Advanced, Human Papillomavirus-Unrelated Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase II Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26: 5140-5152
- 46 Merck’s KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) Met Primary Endpoint of Event-Free Survival (EFS) as Perioperative Treatment Regimen in Patients With Resected, Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma – Merck.com (2025). Zugriff am 01. April 2025 unter: www.merck.com/news/mercks-keytruda-pembrolizumab-met-primary-endpoint-of-event-free-survival-efs-as-perioperative-treatment-regimen-in-patients-with-resected-locally-advanced-head-and-neck-squamous-c/
- 47 Hecht M, Gostian AO, Eckstein M. et al. Safety and efficacy of single cycle induction treatment with cisplatin/docetaxel/durvalumab/tremelimumab in locally advanced HNSCC: first results of CheckRad-CD8. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8
- 48 Vos JL, Elbers JB, Krijgsman O. et al. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab induces major pathological responses in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Commun 2021; 12: 7348
- 49 Forastiere AA, Ismaila N, Lewin JS. et al. Use of Larynx-Preservation Strategies in the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: 1143-1169
- 50 Urba S, Wolf G, Eisbruch A. et al. Single-cycle induction chemotherapy selects patients with advanced laryngeal cancer for combined chemoradiation: a new treatment paradigm. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 593-598
- 51 Wichmann G, Krüger A, Boehm A. et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy for larynx preservation in advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: Outcome prediction after one cycle induction chemotherapy by a score based on clinical evaluation, computed tomography-based volumetry and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT. Eur J Cancer 2017; 72: 144-155
- 52 Sherman EJ, Fisher SG, Kraus DH. et al. TALK score: Development and validation of a prognostic model for predicting larynx preservation outcome. Laryngoscope 2012; 122: 1043-1050
- 53 Wichmann G, Dietz A. Preclinical models to establish innovative therapy strategies Ex‑vivo assessment of head and neck tumor chemo- and immune responses. HNO 2016; 64: 460-469
- 54 Mattavelli D, Wichmann G, Smussi D. et al. Is precision medicine the solution to improve organ preservation in laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer? A position paper by the Preserve Research Group. Front Oncol 2024; 14: 1433333
- 55 Bali A, Bitter T, Mafra M. et al. Endoscopic In Vivo Hyperspectral Imaging for Head and Neck Tumor Surgeries Using a Medically Approved CE-Certified Camera with Rapid Visualization During Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16: 3785