Exploring gender roles in German interventional radiology – how progressive are we?

Abstract

Purpose

This article presents the results of a nationwide survey addressing the status quo of gender equality and family friendliness within German interventional radiology (IR) with a focus on clinical entry and career development.

Materials and Methods

All members of the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR) were invited to participate in an online survey between November 2021 and February 2022. The survey consisted of 39 questions on demographic information, marital and parental status, experiences with entry and promotion in IR, family friendliness, and equality. A descriptive analysis of the responses was conducted.

Results

197 surveys from female (n=76; 39%) and male (n=121; 61%) interventional radiologists at various stages of training and career were analyzed. Fewer female attending physicians (58%) and chiefs of departments (23%) lived with children compared to male attending physicians (76%) and chiefs of departments (55%). Fewer men (4%) than women (41%) were primarily responsible for childcare. More female (55%) than male (6%) attending physicians worked part-time. Women rated entry into IR as more difficult than men. 55% of women felt disadvantaged by their gender (men: 6%); this was due to assumptions that women “perform less than men” (46%), “drop out due to family commitments” (35%) and that “men are promoted preferentially” (19%). 54% believed that it is more difficult for women to combine work and family. The reasons for this are “family commitments” and “lack of flexible work schedules and childcare”. Parents with primary responsibility spent less than 50% of their working time on clinical interventions. Fathers from a younger generation were more likely to take parental leave than fathers of a previous generation (52% vs. 17%). Similar numbers of men (51%) and women (55%) planned to work part-time in the future.

Conclusion

There are gender-specific differences in the German IR. To ensure sustainable recruitment of young talent, measures such as the normalization of flexible work schedules should be introduced to create equal conditions for women and men, as well as mothers and fathers, and thus take changing (family) structures adequately into account.

Key Points

• There are gender-specific differences in career entry/career development in German interventional radiology.

• Working conditions must be adapted to ensure the next generation.

• Changing family structures must be adequately taken into account.

Citation Format

• Dewald CL, Blum SF, Becker LS etal. Exploring gender roles in German interventional radiology – how progressive are we? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2427-0303

Keywords

interventional radiology - gender equality - questionnaire - working conditions

Publication History

Received: 06 February 2024

Accepted after revision: 10 August 2024

Article published online:
04 December 2024

• References

• 1 Gomez LE, Bernet P. Diversity improves performance and outcomes. Journal of the National Medical Association 2019; 111: 383-392
• 2 Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland – GENESIS-Online. 2024 Accessed May 16, 2024 at: https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online?sequenz=tabelleErgebnis&selectionname=21311–0003#abreadcrumb
• 3 Bundesärztekammer (2022) Statistik 2022. Accessed May 16, 2024 at: https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/fileadmin/user_upload/BAEK/Ueber_uns/Statistik/AErztestatistik_2022_09062023.pdf
• 4 Wah TM, Belli AM. The Interventional Radiology (IR) Gender Gap: A Prospective Online Survey by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41: 1241-1253
• 5 Moriarty HK, Clements W, Zia A. et al. The gender imbalance in Interventional Radiology in Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology n/a
• 6 Blum SFU, Dewald CLA, Becker L. et al. The status of academic interventional radiologists in Germany with focus on gender disparity: how can we do better?. CVIR Endovasc 2024; 7: 47
• 7 Englander MJ, O’Horo SK. JOURNAL CLUB: Women in Interventional Radiology: How Are We Doing?. American Journal of Roentgenology 2018; 211: 724-729
• 8 Rosenkrantz AB, Englander MJ, Deipolyi AR. et al. Clinical Practice Patterns of Interventional Radiologists by Gender. American Journal of Roentgenology 2019; 213: 867-874
• 9 Elterngeld 2022: Väteranteil steigt weiter auf 26,1 %. Statistisches Bundesamt. Im Internet. Accessed January 27, 2024 at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2023/03/PD23_123_22922.html
• 10 Queisser M, Fluchtmann J. Familienpolitische Trends in den OECD-Ländern. Wirtschaftsdienst 2023; 103: 589-594
• 11 Mekonnen ADO, Scharff AZ. Frauenpower in der Medizin: Kommt eigentlich heute noch ein Arzt vorbei?. AT 2022; 48: 563-565
• 12 Sieren M, Katoh M, Mahnken AH. et al. Work and Training Conditions of German Residents and Young Radiologists in Interventional Radiology – A Nationwide Survey. Rofo 2022;
• 13 Reder SR, Rohou A, Keric N. et al. Gender differences in self-assessed performance and stress level during training of basic interventional radiology maneuvers. Eur Radiol 2023; 34: 308-317
• 14 Shockley KM, Shen W, DeNunzio MM. et al. Disentangling the relationship between gender and work–family conflict: An integration of theoretical perspectives using meta-analytic methods. Journal of Applied Psychology 2017; 102: 1601-1635