Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2422-8339
Portal vein velocity and its dynamics: a potentially useful tool for detecting clinically silent transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt dysfunction using Doppler ultrasonography
Dr. Corina Radu was supported by the project New smart and adaptive robotics solutions for personalized minimally invasive surgery in cancertreatment—ATHENA, funded by European Union—NextGenerationEU and Romanian Government, under National Recovery and Resilience Plan for Romania, contract no. 760072/23.05.2023, code CF 116/15.11.2022, through the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitalization, within Component 9, investment I8, Ministry of Research, Innovation andDigitization.

Abstract
Background Ultrasound (US) surveillance for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction has yet to be standardized, as clear-cut criteria have not been conventionally defined. This study evaluated the role of US-based parameters in detecting hemodynamic TIPS dysfunction (HD).
Methods We included consecutive patients treated with TIPS. All patients were scheduled within the first six weeks after the procedure for TIPS revision, comprised of a Doppler US exam and invasive hemodynamic reassessment. Clinical TIPS dysfunction (CD) was defined as symptom recurrence, while HD was defined by a portal pressure gradient (PPG)≥12 mmHg. The predictive capabilities of Doppler US for predicting TIPS dysfunction were tested against the hemodynamic gold standard.
Results 86 patients were included. Secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding was the main indication for TIPS in 72 patients (83.7%), while 27 (31.4%) had refractory ascites. HD occurred in 37 cases (43%), of which 25 patients (67.5%) had no CD. Patients with HD had a significantly lower portal vein velocity (PVV): 35 (20–45) cm/s vs. 40.5 (35–50) cm/s, p=0.02. Compared to the immediate post-TIPS assessment, the patients without HD had a ΔPVV of 6.08±19.8 cm/s vs. a decrease of − 8.2±20.2 cm/s in HD (p=0.04). Using a cut-off value of 40.5 cm/s, PVV had an AUROC of 0.705 for predicting HD, while the addition of ΔPVV (cut-off 9.5 cm/s) improved the AUROC to 0.78.
Conclusion Despite adequate symptom control, a considerable percentage of patients have a post-TIPS PPG≥12 mmHg. The dynamic assessment of PVV and its temporal dynamics can reliably predict TIPS dysfunction.
Keywords
shunts - interventional procedures - transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt - TIPS - Color Doppler ultrasoundPublication History
Received: 20 March 2024
Accepted: 24 September 2024
Article published online:
17 December 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Rareș Crăciun, Horia Ștefănescu, Oana Nicoară-Farcău, Petra Fischer, Andreea Fodor, Marcel Tanţău, Corina Radu, Zeno Spârchez, Bogdan Procopeţ. Portal vein velocity and its dynamics: a potentially useful tool for detecting clinically silent transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunt dysfunction using Doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasound Int Open 2024; 10: a24228339.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2422-8339
-
References
- 1
Angeli P,
Bernardi M,
Villanueva C.
et al.
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated
cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2018; 69: 406-460
MissingFormLabel
- 2
De Franchis R,
Vi B.
Position Paper Expanding consensus in portal hypertension Report of the Baveno VI
Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension.
J Hepatol 2015; 63: 743-752
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Bureau C,
Garcia-Pagan JC,
Otal P.
et al.
Improved Clinical Outcome Using Polytetrafluoroethylene-Coated Stents for TIPS: Results
of a Randomized Study. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 469-475
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Perelló MP,
Mur JP,
Vives MS.
et al.
Long-term follow-up of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with stent-graft.
Diagnostic Interv Radiol 2019; 25: 346-352
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Luo X,
Zhao M,
Wang X.
et al.
Long-term patency and clinical outcome of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic
shunt using the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene stent-graft. PLoS One 2019; 14: 1-13
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Klinger C,
Riecken B,
Müller J.
et al.
Doppler ultrasound surveillance of TIPS-patency in the era of covered stents – Retrospective
analysis of a large single-center cohort. Z Gastroenterol 2018; 56: 1053-1062
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Geeroms B,
Laleman W,
Laenen A.
et al.
Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-grafts for transjugular intrahepatic
portosystemic shunts in cirrhotic patients: Long-term patency and clinical outcome
results. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 1795-1803
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Weber CN,
Nadolski GJ,
White SB.
et al.
Long-Term Patency and Clinical Analysis of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene-Covered
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Stent Grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015;
26: 1257-1265
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Perarnau JM,
Le Gouge A,
Nicolas C.
et al.
Covered vs. uncovered stents for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: A
randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol 2014; 60: 962-968
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Bureau C,
Pagan JCG,
Layrargues GP.
et al.
Patency of stents covered with polytetrafluoroethylene in patients treated by transjugular
intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: Long-term results of a randomized multicentre study.
Liver Int 2007; 27: 742-747
MissingFormLabel
- 11
de Franchis R,
Bosch J,
Garcia-Tsao G.
et al.
Baveno VII – Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2022; 76: 959-974
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Abraldes JG,
Gilabert R,
Turnes J.
et al.
Utility of color doppler ultrasonography predicting TIPS dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol
2005; 100: 2696-2701
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Young S,
Scanlon P,
Sherestha P.
et al.
Duplex Ultrasound Versus Clinical Surveillance in the Prediction of TIPS Malfunction
Placed for Refractory Ascites: Is Ultrasound Surveillance Useful?. Cardiovasc Intervent
Radiol 2017; 40: 1861-1865
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Rössle M.
Review TIPS: 25 years later. J Hepatol 2013; 59: 1081-1093
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Manatsathit W,
Samant H,
Panjawatanan P.
et al.
Performance of ultrasound for detection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic
shunt dysfunction: a meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol 2019; 44: 2392-2402
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Owen JM,
Gaba RC.
Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Dysfunction: Concordance of Clinical
Findings, Doppler Ultrasound Examination, and Shunt Venography. J Clin Imaging Sci
2016; 6: 1-7
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Nicolas C,
Le Gouge A,
d’Alteroche L.
et al.
Evaluation of Doppler-ultrasonography in the diagnosis of transjugular intrahepatic
portosystemic shunt dysfunction: A prospective study. World J Hepatol 2017; 9: 1125-1132
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Pan JJ,
Chen C,
Geller B.
et al.
Is sonographic surveillance of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered transjugular intrahepatic
portosystemic shunts (TIPS) necessary? A single centre experience comparing both types
of stents. Clin Radiol 2008; 63: 1142-1148
MissingFormLabel
- 19
De Franchis R.
Revising consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno v consensus workshop
on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2010; 53:
762-768
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Moore KP,
Wong F,
Gines P.
et al.
The management of ascites in cirrhosis: Report on the consensus conference of The
International Ascites Club. Hepatology 2003; 38: 258-266
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Silva-Junior G,
Turon F,
Baiges A.
et al.
Timing Affects Measurement of Portal Pressure Gradient After Placement of Transjugular
Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts in Patients With Portal Hypertension. Gastroenterology
2017; 152: 1358-1365
MissingFormLabel