CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Pneumologie
DOI: 10.1055/a-2414-4197
Originalarbeit

Einsatz von langwirksamen Dreifachkombinationen in der Praxis zur Therapie der chronisch-obstruktiven Lungenerkrankung (COPD) – Die ELETHON-Versorgungsstudie

Use of long-acting triple therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in practice: The ELETHON physiciansʼ survey
Kai-Michael Beeh
1   Institut für Atemwegsforschung GmbH, insaf, Taunusstein, Deutschland
,
2   Medical Department, Berlin-Chemie AG, Berlin, Deutschland (Ringgold ID: RIN14905)
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: BERLIN-CHEMIE

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Studiendaten weisen auf Versorgungslücken im COPD-Langzeitmanagement mit Diskrepanzen zwischen Leitlinienempfehlungen und deren praktischer Umsetzung hin. Die Gründe sind nur unzureichend bekannt. Ziel der ELETHON-Arztbefragung war die Erfassung ärztlicher Einstellungen und Meinungen zu allgemeinen Konzepten der COPD-Therapie, und im Speziellen zur Initiierung einer inhalativen Dreifachtherapie.

Methodik ELETHON war eine bundesweit durchgeführte Querschnittstudie im ambulanten Sektor bei Hausärzten und Pneumologen unter Verwendung eines strukturierten Fragebogens (17 geschlossene Single- bzw. Multiple-Choice-Fragen) zu den Themen Sekundärprävention, Erfassung von Exazerbationen, Therapieeskalation, Auswahl von inhalativen Dreifachtherapien und Prüfung des Therapieerfolgs bei COPD.

Ergebnisse Fragebögen von n=2028 Hausärzten (HA) und n=371 Pneumologen (FA) wurden ausgewertet. Beide Gruppen weisen der Sekundärprävention bei COPD einen hohen Stellenwert zu (HA/FA 76,4%/90,6%), mit Prüfung von Inhalationstechnik, Impfstatus und adäquater inhalativer Pharmakotherapie als wichtigste Bausteine. Aktivität/Rehabilitation wurde bei Hausärzten deutlich seltener genannt (48,3 vs. 84,5%). Exazerbationen und Symptomverschlechterung gelten als dominierende Parameter für eine Therapieeskalation, werden jedoch mehrheitlich unsystematisch erfasst. Als Schwelle wurden „Hospitalisierung“ und „≥2 ambulante Exazerbationen“ am häufigsten genannt. Eosinophile werden mehrheitlich nicht bestimmt. Bei der Auswahl von Dreifachtherapien werden Festkombinationen bevorzugt, die Verfügbarkeit im gleichen Inhalator wie eine Mono- oder duale Therapie als wichtig betont. Der Therapieerfolg wird anhand von Exazerbationen, Lebensqualität, Symptomen, Lungenfunktion und Bedarfsmedikation bewertet. Der COPD Assessment Test (CAT)-Score kommt nur bei wenigen HA/FA zum Einsatz.

Diskussion und Schlussfolgerung Die ELETHON-Arztbefragung zeigt Lücken im COPD-Management auf. Das Konzept der Sekundärprävention wird als wichtig angesehen, dennoch erfolgt eine Therapieeskalation eher spät. Die Bedeutung des Impfstatus deckt sich nicht mit aktuellen Impfquoten, nicht-pharmakologische Maßnahmen werden unzureichend genutzt. Die Erfassung von Exazerbationen und Symptomatik erfolgt unsystematisch; validierte Fragebögen und Eosinophile haben nur einen untergeordneten Stellenwert. ELETHON liefert wichtige Erkenntnisse zu Barrieren und versteckten Potenzialen im Versorgungsalltag der COPD bei Haus- und Fachärzten in Deutschland.

Abstract

Background Gaps in optimal COPD management have been identified in clinical practice, with discrepancies between guideline recommendations and routine care. The reasons for such discrepancies are incompletely understood. The ELETHON survey aimed to identify physicians’ attitudes towards general concepts of COPD management and, in particular, initiation of inhaled triple therapies.

Method ELETHON was a nationwide cross-sectional survey with general practitioners (GP) and pulmonary specialists (PS) working in the ambulatory outpatient setting in Germany, using a structured 17-item questionnaire (single or multiple choice questions) addressing the topics of secondary prevention, exacerbation detection, strategies for therapy escalation, choice of inhaled triple therapies and evaluation of treatment benefits.

Results Questionnaires filled by n=2028 GPs and n=371 PS were analyzed. In both groups, secondary prevention was deemed important in COPD care (GP/PS 76.4%/90.6%), with inhalation technique, vaccination status, and appropriate inhaled pharmacotherapy as key components. Activity/rehabilitation was rarely mentioned by GPs (48.3% vs. 84.5%). Exacerbations and symptomatic worsening were the main triggers for therapy escalation, but were not recorded in a structured way. “Hospitalization” and “≥2 ambulatory exacerbations” were mentioned most frequently as thresholds. Neither GPs nor PS measured eosinophils in the majority of patients. Fixed triple combinations were preferred, with availability of different treatment steps in the same device as important decision aid. Treatment success was evaluated by exacerbations, quality of life, symptoms, lung function and rescue medication use, while COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score was rarely used by GPs and PS.

Discussion and conclusion The ELETHON survey identified gaps in COPD management in Germany. While secondary prevention is deemed important, escalation of inhaled therapy is undertaken rather late, the reported importance of vaccinations does not match current quota in German COPD patients, and non-pharmacological measures are often unused. Exacerbation and symptom documentation is rather subjective, validated questionnaires and blood eosinophils are of minor relevance. These results provide evidence of barriers and hidden potentials towards optimization of routine ambulatory care for COPD patients in Germany.



Publication History

Received: 22 April 2024

Accepted after revision: 26 August 2024

Article published online:
22 October 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Ritchie AI, Wedzicha JA. Definition, Causes, Pathogenesis, and Consequences of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations. Clin Chest Med 2020; 41: 421-438
  • 2 Halpin DM. Preventing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Rev Respir Med 2009; 3: 449-452
  • 3 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for Prevention, Daignosis and Management of COPD: 2024 Report. Accessed April 12, 2024 at: https://goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report/
  • 4 Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztlichd Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie COPD – Teilpublikation der Langfassung, 2. Auflage, Version 1. 2021 https://www.leitlinien.de/themen/copd
  • 5 Singh D, Agusti A, Anzueto A. et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur Respir J 2019; 53: 1-12
  • 6 European Medicines Agency. EMA/697484/2018 – Elebrato Ellipta. Accessed April 12, 2024 at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/de/documents/overview/elebrato-ellipta-epar-medicine-overview_de.pdf
  • 7 European Medicines Agency. EMA/229136/2019 – Trimbow. Accessed April 12, 2024 at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/de/documents/overview/trimbow-epar-medicine-overview_de.pdf
  • 8 European Medicines Agency. EMA/561272/2020 – Trixeo Aerosphere. Accessed April 12, 2024 at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/de/documents/overview/trixeo-aerosphere-epar-medicine-overview_de.pdf
  • 9 Lipson DA, Barnacle H, Birk R. et al. FULFIL Trial: Once-Daily Triple Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 196: 438-446
  • 10 Lipson DA, Barnhart F, Brealey N. et al. Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1671-1680
  • 11 Rabe KF, Martinez FJ, Ferguson GT. et al. Triple Inhaled Therapy at Two Glucocorticoid Doses in Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. N Engl J Med 2020; 338: 35-48
  • 12 Papi A, Vestbo J, Fabbri L. et al. Extrafine inhaled triple therapy versus dual bronchodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRIBUTE): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 1076-1084
  • 13 Celli BR, Anderson JA, Cowans NJ. et al. Pharmacotherapy and Lung Function Decline in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Systematic Review. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 203: 689-698
  • 14 Singh D, Litewka D, Páramo R. et al. DElaying Disease Progression In COPD with Early Initiation of Dual Bronchodilator or Triple Inhaled PharmacoTherapy (DEPICT): A Predictive Modelling Approach. Adv Ther 2023; 40: 4282-4297
  • 15 Bogart M, Germain G, Laliberté F. et al. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Switching Following Moderate/Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation in Patients with Commercial or Medicare Insurance in the United States. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18: 1575-1586
  • 16 Mannino D, Bogart M, Germain G. et al. Benefit of Prompt versus Delayed Use of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Following a COPD Exacerbation. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17: 491-504
  • 17 Hillas G, Perlikos F, Tzanakis N. Acute exacerbation of COPD: is it the “stroke of the lungs”?. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016; 11: 1579-1586
  • 18 Del Pinto R, Giua C, Keber E. et al. Impact of 2021 ESC Guidelines for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention on Hypertensive Patients Risk: Secondary Analysis of Save Your Heart Study. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2023; 30: 167-173
  • 19 Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS. et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetologia 2022; 65: 1925-1966
  • 20 Lu C, Mao X. Risk of adverse reactions associated with inhaled corticosteroids for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103: e36609
  • 21 Yawn BP, Wollan PC. Knowledge and attitudes of family physicians coming to COPD continuing medical education. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2008; 3: 311-317
  • 22 Lugtenberg M, Burgers JS, Besters CF. et al. Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: a survey among general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12: 98
  • 23 Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR. et al. Why donʼt physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282: 1458-1465
  • 24 Akmatov M, Holstiege J, Steffen A. ZfdkViD. et al. Inanspruchnahme von Influenzaimpfungen bei chronisch kranken Personen im vertragsärztlichen Sektor – Auswertung der Abrechnungsdaten für den Zeitraum 2009 bis 2018. In: Versorgungsatlas-Bericht Nr 20/03. Berlin: 2020.
  • 25 Mihm S, Schelling J, Wölle R. et al. Pneumococcal Vaccination Coverage Rates (VCRs) Among Persons with Vaccine-Relevant Underlying Conditions and Persons Aged 60 Years and Older – An Analysis of Secondary Data from the Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) System. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2024; 149: e1-e10
  • 26 Ishigami J, Jaar BG, Charleston JB. et al. Factors Associated With Non-vaccination for Influenza Among Patients With CKD: Findings From the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2024; 83: 196-207.e191
  • 27 Yawn BP, Merrill DD, Martinez S. et al. Knowledge and Attitudes Concerning Herpes Zoster among People with COPD: An Interventional Survey Study. Vaccines 2022; 10: 420
  • 28 Keating A, Lee A, Holland AE. What prevents people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from attending pulmonary rehabilitation? A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis 2011; 8: 89-99
  • 29 Bjoernshave B, Korsgaard J, Jensen C. et al. Participation in pulmonary rehabilitation in routine clinical practice. Clin Respir J 2011; 5: 235-244
  • 30 Burge AT, Cox NS, Abramson MJ. et al. Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 4: Cd012626
  • 31 Matsunaga K, Oishi K, Miravitlles M. et al. Time To Revise COPD Treatment Algorithm. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2019; 14: 2229-2234
  • 32 Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A. et al. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1128-1138
  • 33 Celli BR, Fabbri LM, Aaron SD. et al. An Updated Definition and Severity Classification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations: The Rome Proposal. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021; 204: 1251-1258
  • 34 Jones PW, Lamarca R, Chuecos F. et al. Characterisation and impact of reported and unreported exacerbations: results from ATTAIN. Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 1156-1165
  • 35 Langsetmo L, Platt RW, Ernst P. et al. Underreporting exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a longitudinal cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 396-401
  • 36 Waljee AK, Rogers MA, Lin P. et al. Short term use of oral corticosteroids and related harms among adults in the United States: population based cohort study. BMJ 2017; 357: j1415
  • 37 Yao TC, Huang YW, Chang SM. et al. Association Between Oral Corticosteroid Bursts and Severe Adverse Events: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med 2020; 173: 325-330
  • 38 Hering T, Krinner A, Bulenda D. Validation study of MEP questionnaire for simplified detection of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pneumologie 2022; 76: 671-678
  • 39 Braido F, Baiardini I, Stagi E. et al. Unsatisfactory asthma control: astonishing evidence from general practitioners and respiratory medicine specialists. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2010; 20: 9-12
  • 40 Tse G, Emmanuel B, Ariti C. et al. A Long-Term Study of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Oral Corticosteroid Use in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18: 2565-2580
  • 41 Bazell C, Pollack M, Comellas AP. et al. A 4-Year Retrospective Claims Analysis of Oral Corticosteroid Use and Health Conditions in Newly Diagnosed Medicare FFS Patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17: 2635-2652
  • 42 Strange C, Tkacz J, Schinkel J. et al. Exacerbations and Real-World Outcomes After Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy of Budesonide/Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate, Among Patients with COPD: Results from the EROS (US) Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18: 2245-2256
  • 43 Ismaila AS, Rothnie KJ, Wood RP. et al. Benefit of prompt initiation of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with COPD in England following an exacerbation: a retrospective cohort study. Respir Res 2023; 24: 229
  • 44 Bogart M, Abbott CB, Bangalore M. et al. Changes in Oral Corticosteroid Utilization in Patients with COPD Following Initiation of FF/UMEC/VI. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2023; 18: 2367-2379
  • 45 Beeh KM, Scheithe K, Schmutzler H. et al. Real-World Effectiveness of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for Symptomatic COPD: The ELLITHE Non-Interventional Trial. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2024; 19: 205-216
  • 46 Gessner C, Trinkmann F, Bahari Javan S. et al. Effectiveness of Extrafine Single Inhaler Triple Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Germany – The TriOptimize Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2022; 17: 3019-3031
  • 47 Jones PW, Brusselle G, Dal Negro RW. et al. Patient-centred assessment of COPD in primary care: experience from a cross-sectional study of health-related quality of life in Europe. Prim Care Respir J 2012; 21: 329-336
  • 48 Gruffydd-Jones K, Marsden HC, Holmes S. et al. Utility of COPD Assessment Test (CAT) in primary care consultations: a randomised controlled trial. Prim Care Respir J 2013; 22: 37-43
  • 49 Jones PW, Tabberer M, Chen WH. Creating scenarios of the impact of COPD and their relationship to COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores. BMC Pulm Med 2011; 11: 42
  • 50 European Medicines Agency. Dupixent – Summary of opinion EMA/CHMP/146624/2024 2024. Accessed June 20, 2024 at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/smop/chmp-post-authorisation-summary-positive-opinion-dupixent_en.pdf
  • 51 Halpin DMG, Worsley S, Ismaila AS. et al. INTREPID: single- versus multiple-inhaler triple therapy for COPD in usual clinical practice. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7: 00950-2020
  • 52 Zhang S, King D, Rosen VM. et al. Impact of Single Combination Inhaler versus Multiple Inhalers to Deliver the Same Medications for Patients with Asthma or COPD: A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2020; 15: 417-438
  • 53 Mäkelä MJ, Backer V, Hedegaard M. et al. Adherence to inhaled therapies, health outcomes and costs in patients with asthma and COPD. Respir Med 2013; 107: 1481-1490
  • 54 Daley-Yates P, Brealey N, Thomas S. et al. Therapeutic index of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: A dose-response comparison on airway hyperresponsiveness and adrenal axis suppression. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 87: 483-493
  • 55 Zayed Y, Barbarawi M, Kheiri B. et al. Triple versus dual inhaler therapy in moderate-to-severe COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Respir J 2019; 13: 413-428
  • 56 Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Report 2023. Accessed April 12, 2024 at: https://ginasthma.org/2023-gina-main-report/
  • 57 Punekar YS, Sharma S, Pahwa A. et al. Rescue medication use as a patient-reported outcome in COPD: a systematic review and regression analysis. Respir Res 2017; 18: 86
  • 58 Chalmers JD, Tebboth A, Gayle A. et al. Determinants of initial inhaled corticosteroid use in patients with GOLD A/B COPD: a retrospective study of UK general practice. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2017; 27: 43