Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2409-4916
Patient adherence to surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps and factors associated with loss to follow-up

Abstract
Background and study aims
Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy (SC) plays an integral role in efforts to reduce colorectal cancer risk, but its effectiveness is invariably dependent on patient compliance. This study aimed to evaluate patient adherence to SC after endoscopic resection (ER) of polyps ≥ 20 mm and identify potential barriers associated with loss to follow-up.
Patients and methods
This was a single-center retrospective study evaluating adherence to SC after ER of polyps ≥ 20 mm between April 2018 to December 2021. Adherence to SC was defined as the proportion of patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with loss to follow-up.
Results
A total of 959 patients (mean age 67 years; 47.9% women) underwent endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps ≥ 20 mm (mean size 33.2 ± 13.7 mm). Nearly half of the patients (n = 478; 49.8%) were lost to follow-up. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with a higher likelihood of SC non-adherence were: lack of a primary care physician (odds ratio [OR] 1.7;95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3- 2.3; P < 0.05), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 or 4 (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1–1.9; P < 0.05), residence > 60 miles from the endoscopy suite (OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.2–2.3; P = 0.02), being referred by a physician outside of our healthcare system (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1–1.8; P = 0.01), and lack of written follow-up recommendations on the colonoscopy report (OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.4–10.2; P = 0.01).
Conclusions
Nearly half of patients undergoing ER of colorectal polyps ≥ 20 mm are lost to follow-up. We identified several patient- and healthcare-related factors as barriers to SC adherence. Strategies to address these issues and targeting of high-risk populations are urgently needed to enhance SC programs.
Keywords
Endoscopy Lower GI Tract - Polyps / adenomas / ... - Colorectal cancer - Endoscopic resection (polypectomy, ESD, EMRc, ...)Publication History
Received: 11 March 2024
Accepted after revision: 12 June 2024
Article published online:
29 January 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Aimen Farooq, BahaAldeen Bani Fawwaz, Arooj Mian, Gurdeep Singh, Yiyang Zhang, Peter Gerges, Kambiz Kadkhodayan, Deepanshu Jain, Natalie Cosgrove, Mustafa A Arain, Muhammad Khalid Hasan, Dennis Yang. Patient adherence to surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps and factors associated with loss to follow-up. Endosc Int Open 2025; 13: a24094916.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2409-4916
-
References
- 1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A. et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70: 145-164
- 2 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
- 3 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977-1981
- 4 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: A consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 415-434
- 5 Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Vijan S. et al. Surveillance colonoscopy is cost-effective for patients with adenomas who are at high risk of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2010; 138: 2292-2299
- 6 Greenspan M, Chehl N, Shawron K. et al. Patient Non-adherence and cancellations are higher for screening colonoscopy compared with surveillance colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 2930-2936
- 7 Rogers MC, Keswani RN. Adherence to screening colonoscopy: Can we get our recommendations to stick?. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 2855-2856
- 8 Stenwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE. et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the science conference statement: enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 663-667
- 9 Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, Breen N. et al. Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011; 20: 1611-1621
- 10 Leffler DA, Neeman N, Rabb JM. et al. An alerting system improves adherence to follow-up recommendations from colonoscopy examinations. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1166-1173
- 11 Colquhoun P, Chen HC, Kim JI. et al. High compliance rates observed for follow-up colonoscopy post-polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow-up. Colorectal Dis 2004; 6: 158-161
- 12 Siddiqui AA, Patel A, Huerta S. Determinants of compliance with colonoscopy in patients with adenomatous colon polyps in a veteran population. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 1623-1630
- 13 Turner BJ, Weiner M, Yang C. et al. Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behavior. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 528-532
- 14 Badurdeen DS, Umar NA, Begum R. et al. Timing of procedure and compliance with outpatient endoscopy among an underserved population in an inner-city tertiary institution. Ann Epidemiol 2012; 22: 531-535
- 15 Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Torbara NW. et al. Colonoscopy completion in large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 438-442
- 16 Gurudu SR, Fry LC, Fleischer DE. et al. Factors contributing to patient nonadherence at open-access endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2006; 51: 1942-1945
- 17 Honein-AbouHaidar GN, Kastner M, Vuong V. et al. Systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies evaluating facilitators and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016; 25: 907-917
- 18 Perry N, Bhatte S, Ginsberg G. et al. Extended interval surveillance colonoscopy following piecemeal EMR is safe and effective. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97: AB460-AB461
- 19 Lee KM, Hunleth J, Rolf L. et al. Distance and transportation barriers to colorectal cancer screening in a rural community. J Prim Care Community Health 2023; 14
- 20 Josey MJ, Odahowski CL, Zahnd WE. et al. Disparities in utilization of medical specialists for colonoscopy. Health Equity 2019; 3: 464-471
- 21 Triantafillidis JK, Vagianos C, Gikas A. et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: the role of the primary care physician. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 29: e1-e7
- 22 Cole SR, Young GP, Byrne D. et al. Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on fecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner. J Med Screen 2002; 9: 147-152
- 23 Le V, Syed S, Vega KJ. et al. Patient prompting of their physician resulted in increased colon cancer screening referrals. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 6: 257-262
- 24 Emery JD, Shaw K, Williams B. et al. The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11: 38-48
- 25 Feeley TH, Cooper J, Foels T. et al. Efficacy expectations for colorectal cancer screening in primary care: identifying barriers and facilitators for patients and clinicians. Health Commun 2009; 24: 304-315
- 26 Mason MC, Vedhanayagam K, Jernigan JA. Evaluating patient adherence to routine and symptom indicated colonoscopies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus 2021; 13: e16711
- 27 Stock C, Holleczek B, Hoffmeister M. et al. Adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic colorectal cancer screening: The necessity of organized surveillance. PLoS One 2013; 8: e82676