Deskeletonizing the Sigmoid Sinus Is Noncompulsory in Skull Base Surgery: 3D Modeling of the Translabyrinthine Approach

Abstract

Objectives

Sigmoid sinus (SS) compression and injury is associated with postoperative SS occlusion and corresponding morbidity. Leaving the SS skeletonized with a thin boney protection during surgery might be favorable. This study quantifies the effect of the SS position on the operative exposure in the translabyrinthine approach and assesses the feasibility of retracting a skeletonized SS.

Methods

Twelve translabyrinthine approaches were performed on cadaveric heads with varying SS retraction: skeletonized stationary (TL-S), skeletonized posterior retraction (TL-R), and deskeletonized collapsing of the sinus (TL-C). High-definition three-dimensional reconstruction of the resection cavity was obtained. The primary outcome, “surgical freedom” (mm²), was the area at the level of the craniotomy from which the internal acoustic porus could be reached in an unobstructed straight line. Secondary outcomes include the “exposure angle,” “angle of attack,” and presigmoid depth.

Results

During TL-R, surgical freedom increased by a mean of 41% (range: 9–92%, standard deviation [SD]: 28) when compared to no retraction (TL-S). Collapsing the SS in TL-C provided a mean increase of 52% (range: 19–95%, SD: 22) compared to TL-S. In most cases, the exposure is the greatest when the SS is collapsed. In 40% of the specimens, the provided exposure while retracting (TL-R) instead of collapsing (TL-S) the sinus is equal or greater than 50% of other specimens in which the sinus is collapsed.

Conclusion

In cases with favorable anatomy, a translabyrinthine resection in which the skeletonized SS is retracted provides comparably sufficient exposure for adequate and safe tumor resection.

Keywords

skull base - cerebellopontine - 3D modeling - anatomy - cadaveric - surgical exposure - sigmoid sinus - sinus thrombosis

Disclosures

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. No funding was received for this study. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Publication History

Received: 09 March 2024

Accepted: 28 July 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 July 2024

Article published online:
21 August 2024

• References

• 1 Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM. et al. Quantitative anatomic study of three surgical approaches to the anterior communicating artery complex. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): 397-405 , discussion 397–405
• 2 Gonzalez LF, Crawford NR, Horgan MA, Deshmukh P, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Working area and angle of attack in three cranial base approaches: pterional, orbitozygomatic, and maxillary extension of the orbitozygomatic approach. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (03) 550-555 , discussion 555–557
• 3 Horgan MA, Anderson GJ, Kellogg JX. et al. Classification and quantification of the petrosal approach to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 2000; 93 (01) 108-112
• 4 Tang CT, Kurozumi K, Pillai P, Filipce V, Chiocca EA, Ammirati M. Quantitative analysis of surgical exposure and maneuverability associated with the endoscope and the microscope in the retrosigmoid and various posterior petrosectomy approaches to the petroclival region using computer tomograpy-based frameless stereotaxy. A cadaveric study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013; 115 (07) 1058-1062
• 5 de Melo JOJ, Klescoski J, Nunes CF, Cabral GA, Lapenta MA, Landeiro JA. Predicting the presigmoid retrolabyrinthine space using a sigmoid sinus tomography classification: a cadaveric study. Surg Neurol Int 2014; 5: 131
• 6 Martins Coelho Jr VP, Saquy Rassi M, Colli BO. Retrosigmoid versus retrolabyrinthine posterior petrosal route to the petroclival area: quantitative assessment of endoscope-assisted approaches and correlations with morphometric features. World Neurosurg 2023; 173: e462-e471
• 7 Pennacchietti V, Stoelzel K, Tietze A. et al. First experience with augmented reality neuronavigation in endoscopic assisted midline skull base pathologies in children. Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37 (05) 1525-1534
• 8 Muelleman TJ, Maxwell AK, Peng KA, Brackmann DE, Lekovic GP, Mehta GU. Anatomic assessment of the limits of an endoscopically assisted retrolabyrinthine approach to the internal auditory canal. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82 (Suppl. 03) e184-e189
• 9 Saraceno G, Agosti E, Qiu J. et al. Quantitative anatomical comparison of anterior, anterolateral and lateral, microsurgical and endoscopic approaches to the middle cranial fossa. World Neurosurg 2020; 134: e682-e730
• 10 Figueiredo EG, Beer-Furlan A, Nakaji P. et al. The role of endoscopic assistance in ambient cistern surgery: analysis of four surgical approaches. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (06) 1907-1915
• 11 Schwartz MS, Anderson GJ, Horgan MA, Kellogg JX, McMenomey SO, Delashaw Jr JB. Quantification of increased exposure resulting from orbital rim and orbitozygomatic osteotomy via the frontotemporal transsylvian approach. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (06) 1020-1026
• 12 D'Ambrosio AL, Mocco J, Hankinson TC, Bruce JN, van Loveren HR. Quantification of the frontotemporal orbitozygomatic approach using a three-dimensional visualization and modeling application. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (3, Suppl 1): 251-260 , discussion 260–261
• 13 Yagmurlu K, Safavi-Abbasi S, Belykh E. et al. Quantitative anatomical analysis and clinical experience with mini-pterional and mini-orbitozygomatic approaches for intracranial aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 2017; 127 (03) 646-659
• 14 da Silva SA, Yamaki VN, Solla DJF. et al. Pterional, pretemporal, and orbitozygomatic approaches: anatomic and comparative study. World Neurosurg 2019; 121: e398-e403
• 15 Siwanuwatn R, Deshmukh P, Figueiredo EG, Crawford NR, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Quantitative analysis of the working area and angle of attack for the retrosigmoid, combined petrosal, and transcochlear approaches to the petroclival region. J Neurosurg 2006; 104 (01) 137-142
• 16 Serioli S, Agosti E, Buffoli B. et al. Microsurgical transcranial approaches to the posterior surface of petrosal portion of the temporal bone: quantitative analysis of surgical volumes and exposed areas. Neurosurg Rev 2023; 46 (01) 48
• 17 Luo Z, Zhao P, Yang K, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liu H. The microsurgical anatomy of the modified presigmoid trans-partial bony labyrinth approach. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26 (05) 1619-1623
• 18 Fatima N, Barnard ZR, Maxwell AK. et al. The role of intra-operative duplex ultrasonography following translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannoma. Front Surg 2022; 9: 853704
• 19 Song Y, Ayoub N, Chen JX, Alyono JC, Welling DB. Pulmonary embolism and sigmoid sinus thrombosis after translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection: a retrospective case series. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2022; 131 (06) 683-689
• 20 Freeman MH, Cass ND, Berndt DM. et al. Association of postoperative sigmoid sinus occlusion and cerebrospinal fluid leak in translabyrinthine surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168 (03) 435-442
• 21 Shew M, Kavookjian H, Dahlstrom K. et al. Incidence and risk factors for sigmoid venous thrombosis following CPA tumor resection. Otol Neurotol 2018; 39 (05) e376-e380
• 22 Arnone GD, Kunigelis KE, Gurau A, Coulter I, Thompson J, Youssef AS. Acute sigmoid sinus compromise following skull base procedures: is a “Laissez-Faire” approach best?. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 82 (06) 652-658
• 23 Ziegler A, El-Kouri N, Dymon Z. et al. Sigmoid sinus patency following vestibular schwannoma resection via retrosigmoid versus translabyrinthine approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 82 (04) 461-465
• 24 Brahimaj BC, Beer-Furlan A, Crawford F. et al. Dural venous sinus thrombosis after vestibular schwannoma surgery: the anticoagulation dilemma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82 (Suppl. 03) e3-e8
• 25 Hitselberger WE, House WF. Transtemporal Bone Microsurgical Removal of Acoustic Neuromas. Tumors of the Cerebellopontine Angle. Arch Otolaryngol 1964; 80: 720-731
• 26 Poulsgaard L. Chapter 46 - Translabyrinthine approach to vestibular schwannomas. In: Quiñones-Hinojosa A. ed. Schmidek and Sweet Operative Neurosurgical Techniques. 6th ed.. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 2012: 555-564
• 27 Jackler RK. Atlas of Skull Base Surgery & Neurotology. Thieme; 2009. Accessed August 5, 2024 at: https://skullbasesurgeryatlas.stanford.edu/illustrations-of-skull-base-surgery-and-neurotology/lateral-approaches-to-the-internal-auditory-canal-and-cerebellopontine-angle/translabyrinthine-approach/#
• 28 Hoz SS, Palmisciano P, Albairmani SS. et al. A proposed classification system for presigmoid approaches: a scoping review. J Neurosurg 2023; 139 (04) 965-971
• 29 Kwon SM, Na MK, Choi KS. et al. Comparative cadaveric analysis for surgical corridor and maneuverability: far-lateral approach and its transcondylar extension. World Neurosurg 2021; 146: e979-e984
• 30 Elms HL, Straka DM, Abouelella DK, Francis HW, Kaylie DM, Cunningham III CD. Translabyrinthine craniotomy is associated with higher risk of asymptomatic dural venous sinus thrombosis in vestibular schwannoma resection. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44 (10) 1066-1072
• 31 Trevisi G, Giovanni P, Ciaffi G, Auricchio AM, Sturiale CL. Venous sinus thrombosis-associated with posterior cranial fossa surgery. a systematic review and meta-analysis of natural history, risk factors, treatment, and outcome. World Neurosurg 2024; 186: 122-132
• 32 Fick T, van Doormaal JAM, Tosic L. et al. Fully automatic brain tumor segmentation for 3D evaluation in augmented reality. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 51 (02) E14
• 33 Vervoorn MT, Wulfse M, Van Doormaal TPC, Ruurda JP, Van der Kaaij NP, De Heer LM. Mixed reality in modern surgical and interventional practice: narrative review of the literature. JMIR Serious Games 2023; 11: e41297