Pilot Program in Surgical Anatomy Education for Complex Cranial and Skull Base Procedures: Curriculum Overview and Initial 2-Year Experience at Mayo Clinic

Abstract

Background Cadaveric dissection remains a preferred and irreplaceable learning modality among neurosurgery residents. We aimed to develop and describe a tiered, quantifiable, and practical curriculum for cranial neurosurgical anatomy education. We report the structure and evaluation of our 2-year pilot study to serve as a suggested guide for other neurosurgery programs.

Methods Our Complex Cranial Dissection Program is tailored to the needs of junior-level neurosurgery residents based on their postgraduation years 1 to 4. Dissections are performed in a sequential manner, each of which emphasize a particular set of manual skills and neuroanatomical knowledge. Dissections are scored on a scale of 10 points. The grading was based on specific landmarks and anatomical structures, which need to be exposed, explored, and preserved.

Results Out of 16 residents, 14 individuals (87.5%) attended the dissections in the first iteration of the program and 16 individuals (100%) attended the dissections in the second iteration. A total of 17 dissections were performed across all years. In survey feedback about the program, 100% (Year 1) and 94% (Year 2) of residents considered the assigned dissections to be appropriate for their respective training levels. Further, 100% (Year 1) and 94% (Year 2) of residents endorsed that the dissections were important and helpful for their practice prior to similar operating room experiences.

Conclusion The development and implementation of structured dissection programs within residency training, along with dedicated staff, and objective feedback serve a crucial role in neurosurgical education to further develop and enhance surgical skills in the operative setting.

Keywords

neurosurgical education - neuroanatomy - skull base anatomy - neurosurgery resident education

• References

• 1 Arantes M, Arantes J, Ferreira MA. Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18 (01) 94
• 2 Lewis CT, Zeineddine HA, Esquenazi Y. Challenges of neurosurgery education during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: a U.S. perspective. World Neurosurg 2020; 138: 545-547
• 3 Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, Wainman B. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2013; 6 (04) 211-215
• 4 Farhadi DS, Jubran JH, Zhao X. et al. The neuroanatomic studies of Albert L. Rhoton Jr. in historical context: an analysis of origin, evolution, and application. World Neurosurg 2020
• 5 Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS, Tubbs RS. A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation. Clin Anat 2021; 34 (01) 108-114
• 6 Knopf JD, Kumar R, Barats M. et al. Neurosurgical operative videos: an analysis of an increasingly popular educational resource. World Neurosurg 2020; 144: e428-e437
• 7 Woo PYM, Wong DKK, Yuan Y. et al. A morphometric analysis of commonly used craniometric approaches for freehand ventriculoperitoneal shunting. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2022; 22 (02) 51-60
• 8 Leonel LCP, Carlstrom LP, Graffeo CS. et al. Foundations of advanced neuroanatomy: technical guidelines for specimen preparation, dissection, and 3D-photodocumentation in a surgical anatomy laboratory. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82 (Suppl. 03) e248-e258
• 9 Gnanakumar S, Kostusiak M, Budohoski KP. et al. Effectiveness of cadaveric simulation in neurosurgical training: a review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2018; 118: 88-96
• 10 Graffeo CS, Perry A, Copeland III WR, Raghunathan A, Link MJ. Histology of the distal dural ring. Clin Anat 2017; 30 (06) 742-746
• 11 Gomar-Alba M, Parrón-Carreño T, Narro-Donate JM. et al. Neuroendoscopic training in neurosurgery: a simple and feasible model for neurosurgical education. Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37 (08) 2619-2624
• 12 de Oliveira ASB, Leonel LCPC, LaHood ER. et al. Foundations and guidelines for high-quality three-dimensional models using photogrammetry: a technical note on the future of neuroanatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 2023; 16 (05) 870-883
• 13 Bernardo A. Establishment of next-generation neurosurgery research and training laboratory with integrated human performance monitoring. World Neurosurg 2017; 106: 991-1000
• 14 Pais D, Casal D, Mascarenhas-Lemos L, Barata P, Moxham BJ, Goyri-O'Neill J. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: a 3-year prospective study. Anat Sci Educ 2017; 10 (02) 127-136
• 15 Tschabitscher M, Di Ieva A. Practical guidelines for setting up an endoscopic/skull base cadaver laboratory. World Neurosurg 2013; 79 (2, Suppl): 16.e1-16.e7
• 16 Bauman MMJ, Meyer JH, Ali RP, Clarke MJ, Peris Celda M. The critical need to address gender inequities in resident feedback and ensure equitable education for all trainees in neurosurgical training. J Neurosurg 2023; 140 (05) 1507-1510
• 17 Shimizu S, Tanaka R, Rhoton Jr AL. et al. Anatomic dissection and classic three-dimensional documentation: a unit of education for neurosurgical anatomy revisited. Neurosurgery 2006; 58 (05) E1000 , discussion E1000
• 18 Martins C, Ribas EC, Rhoton Jr AL, Ribas GC. Three-dimensional digital projection in neurosurgical education: technical note. J Neurosurg 2015; 123 (04) 1077-1080
• 19 Çırak M, Yağmurlu K, Soldozy S, Norat P, Shaffrey ME, Kalani MYS. Common challenges and solutions associated with the preparation of silicone-injected human head and neck vessels for anatomical study. Brain Sci 2020; 11 (01) 32
• 20 Signorelli F, Stumpo V, Della Pepa GM. et al. Step-up establishment of neurosurgical laboratory starting with limited resources-tips and tricks. World Neurosurg 2019; 126: 83-89