Adaptive Changes in Longitudinal Arch During Long-distance
                    Running

Weiyan Ren; Yan Wang; Zhaoqi Yan; Zhaowei Chu; Fan Yang; Yih-Kuen Jan; Jie Yao; Fang Pu

doi:10.1055/a-2362-1267

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Int J Sports Med 2024; 45(14): 1091-1098
DOI: 10.1055/a-2362-1267

Orthopedics & Biomechanics

Adaptive Changes in Longitudinal Arch During Long-distance Running

Authors

Weiyan Ren‡

¹School of Engineering Medicine, Beihang University, Beijing, China
Yan Wang‡

²Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
Zhaoqi Yan

³School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
Zhaowei Chu

⁴Li Ning Sports Science Research Center, Li Ning Co Ltd, Beijing, China
Fan Yang

⁴Li Ning Sports Science Research Center, Li Ning Co Ltd, Beijing, China
Yih-Kuen Jan

⁵Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
Jie Yao

³School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China

⁶Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
Fang Pu

³School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China

⁶Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China

Abstract

This study investigates the biomechanical adaptations of the longitudinal arch (LA) in long-distance runners, focusing on changes in stiffness, angle, and moment during a 60-minute run. Twenty runners participated in this experiment, and were asked to run at a speed of 2.7 m·s^-1 for 60 minutes. The kinematic and kinetic data collected at five-minute intervals during running were calculated, including the stiffness of LA in the loading phase (k _load) and the stiffness of LA in the unloading phase (k _unload), the maximum LA moment (M _max), the range of LA angle change (∆θ _range), and the maximum LA angle change (∆θ _max). Foot morphology was also scanned before and after running. Variations of kinematic and kinetic data were analyzed throughout the running activity, as well as variations of foot morphology pre- and post-run. Results showed that there was a significant decrease in k _load (p<0.001), coupled with increases in ∆θ _range (p=0.002) and ∆θ _max (p<0.001), during the first 15 minutes of running, which was followed by a period of mechanical stability. No differences were found in k _unload and M _max throughout the running process and the foot morphology remained unchanged after running. These results highlight a critical adaptation phase that may be pivotal for improving running economy and performance.

Keywords

foot morphology - longitudinal arch stiffness - longitudinal arch angle - longitudinal arch moment - long-distance running

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Van Gent RN, Siem D, Van Middelkoop M. et al. Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2007; 41: 469-480
2 Hespanhol LC, de Carvalho ACA, Costa LOP. et al. Lower limb alignment characteristics are not associated with running injuries in runners: Prospective cohort study. Eur J Sport Sci 2016; 16: 1137-1144
3 Crompton RH, Vereecke EE, Thorpe SKS. Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor. J ANAT 2008; 212: 501-543
4 Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR. et al. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature 1987; 325: 147-149
5 Hebert-Losier K, Finlayson SJ, Driller MW. et al. Metabolic and performance responses of male runners wearing 3 types of footwear: Nike Vaporfly 4%, Saucony Endorphin racing flats, and their own shoes. J Sport Health Sci 2022; 11: 275-284
6 Matsumoto Y, Ogihara N, Hanawa H. et al. Novel Multi-Segment Foot Model Incorporating Plantar Aponeurosis for Detailed Kinematic and Kinetic Analyses of the Foot With Application to Gait Studies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10: 894731
7 Su WY, Zhang S, Ye DQ. et al. Effects of Barefoot and Shod on the In Vivo Kinematics of Medial Longitudinal Arch During Running Based on a High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging System. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10: 917675
8 Kelly LA, Lichtwark GA, Farris DJ. et al. Shoes alter the spring-like function of the human foot during running. J R Soc Interface 2016; 13: 20160174
9 Zifchock RA, Davis I, Hillstrom H. et al. The effect of gender, age, and lateral dominance on arch height and arch stiffness. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 367-372
10 Zhao XG, Gu YD, Yu JB. et al. The Influence of Gender, Age, and Body Mass Index on Arch Height and Arch Stiffness. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 59: 298-302
11 Zhao XG, Gu YD, Yu JB. et al. Do Arch Height and Arch Stiffness Relate to Physical Performance in Adult Men?. J Foot Ankle Surg 2022; 61: 259-263
12 Bruening DA, Pohl MB, Takahashi KZ. et al. Midtarsal locking, the windlass mechanism, and running strike pattern: A kinematic and kinetic assessment. J Biomech 2018; 73: 185-191
13 Holowka NB, Richards A, Sibson BE. et al. The human foot functions like a spring of adjustable stiffness during running. J Exp Biol 2021; 224: jeb219667
14 Kern AM, Papachatzis N, Patterson JM. et al. Ankle and midtarsal joint quasi-stiffness during walking with added mass. Peerj 2019; 7: e7487
15 Cowley E, Marsden J. The effects of prolonged running on foot posture: A repeated measures study of half marathon runners using the foot posture index and navicular height. J Foot Ankle Res 2013; 6: 20
16 Fukano M, Inami T, Nakagawa K. et al. Foot posture alteration and recovery following a full marathon run. Eur J Sport Sci 2018; 18: 1338-1345
17 Vermand S, Duc S, Ferrari FJ. et al. Changes in foot measurements, plantar pressure and postural position during a mountain ultra-marathon race. Sci Sport 2019; 34
18 Boyer ER, Ward ED, Derrick TR. Medial Longitudinal Arch Mechanics Before and After a 45-Minute Run. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2014; 104: 349-356
19 Shiotani H, Mizokuchi T, Yamashita R. et al. Acute effects of long-distance running on mechanical and morphological properties of the human plantar fascia. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 1360-1368
20 TenBroek TM, Rodrigues PA, Frederick EC. et al. Midsole Thickness Affects Running Patterns in Habitual Rearfoot Strikers During a Sustained Run. J Appl Biomech 2014; 30: 521-528
21 Sanno M, Epro G, Bruggemann GP. et al. Running into Fatigue: The Effects of Footwear on Kinematics, Kinetics, and Energetics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2021; 53: 1217-1227
22 Apte S, Prigent G, Stoggl T. et al. Biomechanical Response of the Lower Extremity to Running-Induced Acute Fatigue: A Systematic Review. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 646042
23 Edama M, Ohya T, Maruyama S. et al. Relationship between Changes in Foot Arch and Sex Differences during the Menstrual Cycle. Int J Env Res Pub He 2023; 20: 509
24 Girard O, Morin JB, Ryu J. et al. Running Velocity Does Not Influence Lower Limb Mechanical Asymmetry. Front Sports Act Living 2019; 24: 36
25 Bradford I, Kirkwood P, Eddy J. et al. Arch Stiffness Does Not Determine Running Economy in Recreational Runners. Int J Exerc Sci 2023; 16: 402-441
26 Kelly LA, Farris DJ, Lichtwark GA. et al. The Influence of Foot-Strike Technique on the Neuromechanical Function of the Foot. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2018; 50: 98-108
27 Kessler SE, Rainbow MJ, Lichtwark GA. et al. A Direct Comparison of Biplanar Videoradiography and Optical Motion Capture for Foot and Ankle Kinematics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7: 199
28 Farris DJ, Kelly LA, Cresswell AG. et al. The functional importance of human foot muscles for bipedal locomotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2019; 116: 1645-1650
29 Holowka NB, Gillinov SM, Virot E. et al. Effects of footwear cushioning on leg and longitudinal arch stiffness during running. J Biomech 2022; 133: 110869
30 Kirby KA. Longitudinal arch load-sharing system of the foot. Revista Española de Podología 2017; 28: e18-e26
31 Sichting F, Holowka NB, Ebrecht F. et al. Evolutionary anatomy of the plantar aponeurosis in primates, including humans. J Anat 2020; 237: 85-104
32 Wren TAL, Lindsey DP, Beaupre GS. et al. Effects of creep and cyclic loading on the mechanical properties and failure of human Achilles tendons. Ann Biomed Eng 2003; 31: 710-717
33 Fiolkowski P, Brunt D, Bishop M. et al. Intrinsic pedal musculature support of the medial longitudinal arch: An electromyography study. J foot ankle surg 2003; 42: 327-333
34 Thordarson DB, Schmotzer H, Chon J. et al. Dynamic support of the human longitudinal arch. A biomechanical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat R 1995; 316: 165-172
35 Headlee DL, Leonard JL, Hart JM. et al. Fatigue of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles increases navicular drop. J Electromyogr Kines 2008; 18: 420-425
36 Kamiya T, Uchiyama E, Watanabe K. et al. Dynamic effect of the tibialis posterior muscle on the arch of the foot during cyclic axial loading. Clin Biomech 2012; 27: 962-966
37 Imhauser CW, Siegler S, Abidi NA. et al. The effect of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction on the plantar pressure characteristics and the kinematics of the arch and the hindfoot. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 161-169
38 Karamanidis K, Arampatzis A, Bruggemann GP. Reproducibility of electromyography and ground reaction force during various running techniques. Gait Posture 2004; 19: 115-123
39 Keller TS, Weisberger AM, Ray JL. et al. Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running. Clin biomech 1996; 11: 253-259
40 Hoogkamer W, Kipp S, Spiering BA. et al. Altered Running Economy Directly Translates to Altered Distance-Running Performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016; 48: 2175-2180
41 Garcia-Perez JA, Perez-Soriano P, Llana S. et al. Effect of overground vs treadmill running on plantar pressure: Influence of fatigue. Gait Posture 2013; 38: 929-933