Motivation and success factors in radiological research in Germany – results of a survey by the Methodology and Research Working Group of the German Radiological Society

Abstract

Purpose

Investigation of motivation and identification of success factors in radiology research in Germany.

Materials and Methods

Using a German online survey (54 questions, period: 3.5 months), demographic aspects, intrinsic and extrinsic success characteristics, as well as personal and organizational success factors were surveyed based on a career success model. The survey results were reported descriptively. The correlations between success factors and success characteristics were examined using linear, binary-logistic, and multinomial regression models.

Results

176 people (164 academically active, 10 not academically active) answered the survey. Most participants (80%, 139/174) worked at a university hospital. 32% had privatdozent or professor as their highest academic title (56/173). The researchers' main motivation was intrinsic interest in research (55%, 89/163), followed by a desire to increase their own career opportunities (25%, 41/163). The following were identified as factors for intrinsic success: i) support from department management (estimate=β=0.26, p<0.001), ii) good work-life balance (β=0.37, p<0.001), and iii) the willingness to pursue science even after reaching the career goal (β=0.16, p<0.016). Relevant factors for extrinsic scientific success were mentoring, protected research time, and activities in professional societies.

Conclusion

Researchers in German radiology are mainly intrinsically motivated. Factors known from the literature that determine intrinsic and extrinsic scientific success were confirmed in this study. Knowledge of these factors allows targeted systematic support and could thus increase scientific success in German radiology.

Key Points

• Main motivation for German radiology research is intrinsic interest, followed by career opportunities.

• Factors for intrinsic scientific success are good work-life balance and support by department management.

• Factors for extrinsic scientific success are mentoring, activities in professional societies, and protected research time.

Citation Format

• Wegner F, Heinrichs H, Stahlmann K et al. Motivation and success factors in radiological research in Germany – results of a survey by the Methodology and Research Working Group of the German Radiological Society. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2025; 197: 424–435

Keywords

success factors - scientific success - survey - radiological research

Publication History

Received: 25 March 2024

Accepted after revision: 03 June 2024

Article published online:
25 July 2024

• References

• 1 Brindis RG, Spertus J. The Role of Academic Medicine in Improving Health Care Quality. Acad Med 2006; 81: 802-806
• 2 Sacristán JA. Clinical research and medical care: towards effective and complete integration. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 4
• 3 Bhargavan M, Kaye AH, Forman HP. et al. Workload of radiologists in United States in 2006–2007 and trends since 1991–1992. Radiology 2009; 252: 458-467
• 4 Van Dijk D, Manor O, Carey LB. Publication metrics and success on the academic job market. Curr. Biol 2014; 24: R516-R517
• 5 Koltun V, Hafner D. The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. PLoS ONE 2021; 16: e0253397
• 6 Buddeberg-Fischer B, Stamm M, Buddeberg C. et al. Career-Success Scale – A new instrument to assess young physicians’ academic career steps. BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 120
• 7 Lee LS, Pusek SN, McCormack WT. et al. Clinical and Translational Scientist Career Success: Metrics for Evaluation. Clin Transl Sci 2012; 5: 400-407
• 8 Rubio DM, Primack BA, Switzer GE. et al. A Comprehensive Career-Success Model for Physician–Scientists. Acad Med 2011; 86: 1571-1576
• 9 Cola PA, Wang Y. Discovering Factors that Influence Physician Scientist Success in Academic Medical Centers. Qual Health Res 2022; 32: 1433-1446
• 10 Robinson GFWB, Schwartz LS, DiMeglio LA. et al. Understanding Career Success and Its Contributing Factors for Clinical and Translational Investigators. Acad Med 2016; 91: 570-582
• 11 Yoon S, Koh W-P, Ong MEH. et al. Factors influencing career progress for early stage clinician-scientists in emerging Asian academic medical centres: a qualitative study in Singapore. BMJ Open 2018; 8: e020398
• 12 Lenzner T, Neuert C, Otto W. Cognitive Pretesting / Kognitives Pretesting (GESIS Survey Guidelines). 2016
• 13 Stoehr F, Müller L, Brady AP. et al. Online teaching in radiology as a pilot model for modernizing medical education: results of an international study in cooperation with the ESR. Insights Imaging 2021; 12: 141
• 14 Molwitz I, Kemper C, Stahlmann K. et al. Work expectations, their fulfillment, and exhaustion among radiologists of all career levels: what can be learned from the example of Germany. Eur Radiol 2023; 33: 5664-5674
• 15 Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marušić A. Mentoring in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1103
• 16 Vieira A, Cabri MM, Spijkers S. et al. Mentoring in radiology: An asset worth exploring!. Eur J Radiol 2022; 155: 110133
• 17 Blickle G, Kuhnert B, Rieck S. Laufbahnförderung durch ein Unterstützungsnetzwerk: Ein neuer Mentoringansatz und seine empirische Überprüfung. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 2003; 2: 118-128
• 18 Proft F, Vossen D. die Kommission Fort- und Weiterbildung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie. et al. Befragung zu den Arbeits-, Weiterbildungs- und Forschungsbedingungen von Assistenzärztinnen und -ärzten in der internistisch-rheumatologischen Weiterbildung – BEWUSST. Z Rheumatol 2024; 83: 257-268
• 19 Oechtering TH, Panagiotopoulos N, Völker M. et al. Work and Training Conditions of German Residents in Radiology – Results from a Nationwide Survey Conducted by the Young Radiology Forum in the German Roentgen Society. Rofo 2020; 192: 458-470
• 20 Paulhus DL. Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In: The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2002: 49-69
• 21 Richter-Kuhlmann E. Clinician Scientists: Synthese von Klinik und Forschung. Dtsch Arztebl 2023; 120: A-79 / B
• 22 Barnard JA. Protected Time: A Vital Ingredient for Research Career Development. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 60: 292-293