PDF herunterladen
Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Sustainability & Circularity NOW 2024; 01: a23302567
DOI: 10.1055/a-2330-2567
Original Article

Dynamics of Business Models in Circular Economy: Shifting Challenges in Pilot Projects

Authors

  • J. Lauten-Weiss

    1   Schumpeter School of Business and Economics, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany

  • H. Friege 

    2   Faculty for Sustainability, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany

  • I. Westphal

    3   BIBA, Universität Bremen, Bremen, Germany

  • J. Brinker

    4   Smart Enterprise Engineering, Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany

Gefördert durch: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung FONA ReziProK
Weitere Informationen
  Lizenzen und Reprints Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik


Graphical Abstract

Preview

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamics of circular business models (CBMs) through a multiple case study of 12 pilot projects funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research between 2019 and 2022. The aim of this study was to draw practical conclusions for CBM pilot projects and public funding tenders, as well as to reveal theoretical insights into the motivation, perceptions of challenges, and potentials regarding CBMs and their shifts over time. Focused on remanufacturing and product-service systems (PSS), the study reveals significant shifts in motivation and perceived challenges before and after the pilot projects. Post-pilot, financial considerations emerged as a primary motivator for CBM adoption, alongside market pull factors and resource availability. However, challenges such as cost-related issues, supply chain complexities, and internal realignment hurdles persisted. Conversely, the perception of market-related challenges had decreased after the pilots, suggesting a growing readiness and adaptability of the market to CBMs. Similarly, experience-related challenges saw a decline, indicating an improvement in knowledge and capabilities within consortia over time. Moreover, the study examines shifts in perceived potential, revealing heterogeneous outcomes across different types of CBMs. While some projects identified new possibilities for value chain cooperation and transparency, others expressed skepticism about further potential, particularly in PSS-focused pilots. This study contributes to the growing body of literature on CBMs by providing empirical insights into the dynamics of circular economy (CE) pilot projects and their impact on organizational learning.

Keywords

Circular business models - Product-as-a-Service - Remanufacturing

Supporting Information



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 29. Februar 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 08. Mai 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
01. Juli 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
J. Lauten-Weiss, H. Friege, I. Westphal, J. Brinker. Dynamics of Business Models in Circular Economy: Shifting Challenges in Pilot Projects. Sustainability & Circularity NOW 2024; 01: a23302567.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2330-2567
 

  • Bibliography

  • 1 Argyris Ch, Schön DA. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reis: Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas. Centro de Investigaciones Sociologicas; 1997: 345-348
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Assmann IR, Rosati F, Morioka SN. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2023; 32: 6008-6028
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Blomsma F, Bauwens T, Weissbrod I, Kirchherr J. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2023; 32: 1010-1031
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bocken NM.P, de Pauw I, Bakker C, van der Grinten B. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2016; 33: 308-320
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bocken NM.P, Schuit CS.C, Kraaijenhagen C. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 2018; 28: 79-95
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Boehm M, Thomas O. J. Clean. Prod. 2013; 51: 245-260
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Bressanelli G, Pigosso DC. A, Saccani N, Perona M. J. Clean. Prod. 2021; 298: 126819
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Brinker J, Beinke JH, Thomas O, Westphal I, Thoben KD, Gleede B. Gestaltung kreislauffähiger Geschäftsmodelle. Einblicke aus Wissenschaft und Praxis. I40M 2022 2022: 9-13
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Cramer J. Milieu: Elementaire Deeltjes: 16. Amsterdam University Press; 2014
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 10 D’Adamo I, Rosa P. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016; 86: 2575-2584
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Desing H, Braun G, Hischier R. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021; 164: 105179
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 12 European Parliament. Circular economy: definition, importance and benefits [WWW Document]. 2021 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/economy/20151201STO05603/circular-economy-definition-importance-and-benefits accessed 14.03.2022
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 13 European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment. OJ L; 2020
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 14 European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Text with EEA relevance) 2018
  • 15 Friege H. Müll und Abfall 2022; 609-617
  • 16 Geissdoerfer M, Santa-Maria T, Kirchherr J, Pelzeter C. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2022; 32: 3814-3832
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Hina M, Chauhan C, Kaur P, Kraus S, Dhir A. J. Clean. Prod. 2022; 333: 130049
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Jensen JP, Prendeville SM, Bocken NM. P, Peck D. J. Clean. Prod. 2019; 218: 304-314
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Kjaer LL, Pigosso DC. A, Niero M, Bech NM, McAloone TC. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019; 23: 22-35
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Konietzko J, Bocken N, Hultink EJ. J. Clean. Prod. 2020; 253: 119942
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Linder M, Williander M. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2015; 26: 182-196
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Mhatre P, Panchal R, Singh A, Bibyan S. Sustain. Prod. Consump. 2021; 26: 187-202
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Mo JP. T. Adv. Decis. Sci. 2012; 2012: 1-19
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Morseletto P. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020; 153: 104553
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Neely A. Oper. Manag. Res. 2008; 1: 103-118
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Nilsen HR. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2020; 47: 27-40
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Paz FA. G, Heibeck M, Parvez AM, Torrubia J, Van Den Boogaart KG, Raatz S. Sustainability 2024; 16: 1082
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Potting J, Hanemaaijer A, Delahaye R, Ganzevles J, Hoekstra R, Lijzen J. Circular economy: what we want to know and can measure. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; The Hague: 2018
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Potting J, Hekkert M, Worrell E, Hanemaaijer A. Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; The Hague: 2017
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Richter A, Steven M. On the Relation Between Industrial Product-Service Systems and Business Models. in Operations Research Proceedings 2008. Fleischmann B, Borgwardt KH, Klein R, Tuma A. Eds Springer; Berlin Heidelberg: 2009: 97-102
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Rockström J, Gupta J, Lenton TM, Quin D, Lade SJ, Abrams JF. Earth’s Future 2021; 9: e2020EF001866
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Stahel WR. Nature 2016; 531: 435-438
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Stumpf L, Schöggl JP, Baumgartner RJ. J. Clean. Prod. 2021; 316: 128158
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Tukker A. J. Clean. Prod. 2015; 97: 76-91
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Tunn VS. C, Fokker R, Luijkx KA, De Jong SA. M, Schoormans JP. L. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2019; 11: 274
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Tura N, Hanski J, Ahola T, Ståhle M, Piiparinen S, Valkokari P. J. Clean. Prod. 2019; 212: 90-98
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Ul-Durar S, Awan U, Varma A, Memon S, Mention AL. J. Knowl. Manag. 2023; 27: 2217-2248
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Veleva V, Bodkin G. J. Clean. Prod. 2018; 188: 20-37
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Vermunt DA, Negro SO, Verweij PA, Kuppens DV, Hekkert MP. J. Clean. Prod. 2019; 222: 891-902
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Weissbrod I, Bocken NM. P. J. Clean. Prod. 2017; 142: 2663-2676
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sixth edition. ed SAGE; Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore Washington DC Melbourne: 2018
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Zink T, Geyer R. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017; 21: 593-602
    Suche in Google Scholar