Network Analysis of the North American Skull Base Society Membership

Abstract

Background The membership of the North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) has grown considerably in recent years with diversity in subspecialty training, gender, and geography. The academic relationships and contributions of its membership have not been studied.

Objectives This study aimed to (1) measure academic contributions of NASBS membership; (2) identify influential nodes of academic collaboration; (3) identify opportunities for future collaboration and mentorship.

Methods Peer-reviewed publications of members of NASBS (2019 NASBS website) were identified using Scopus author name search. Network structures were constructed and analyzed using the graph-tool python library to produce a weighted coauthorship network and compute centrality measures. Visual network maps were then produced using Gephi network visualization software.

Results The coauthor network contained 952 members with found publications and 4,996 connections. A total of 846 (88.9%) members were contained in a single connected giant component; 102 members were unconnected, and 64 members had a single connection. Girvan–Newman clustering identified 267 communities, where 13 contained at least 1% of the total membership each. The three largest communities contained 23.3, 8.4, and 6.9% of members. There were 111 published members identified as women; 5.4% of women were unconnected versus 11.4% of men. Average publication count for women was 32.3 (standard deviation [SD] 38.5) versus 70.5 (SD 106) for men. Average citation count for women was 543 (SD 1,012) versus 1,389 (SD 2,893) for men.

Conclusion Network mapping of membership of the NASBS helps to visualize the academic activities and relationships of the NASBS and reveals areas of concentration and influence within the specialty.

Keywords

network - gender - society - publications

Publication History

Received: 22 February 2024

Accepted: 31 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
02 April 2024

Article published online:
25 April 2024

• References

• 1 Newman MEJ. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98 (02) 404-409
• 2 Luebs J, Snyderman C. Network analysis of NASBS membership. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81: S1-S272
• 3 Kondrak G. N-gram similarity and distance. In: Consens M, Navarro G. eds. String Processing and Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer; 2005: 115-126
• 4 Gender API. Accessed October 23, 2023 at: https://gender-api.com/en/
• 5 Peixoto TP. The graph-tool python library. figshare. Dataset. Posted May 27, 2017. Accessed October 22, 2023 at: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/graph_tool/1164194/14
• 6 Newman MEJ. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2001; 64 (1 Pt 2): 016132
• 7 Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 2009;3: 361-362
• 8 Girvan M, Newman MEJ. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99 (12) 7821-7826