CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2024; 84(06): 564-572
DOI: 10.1055/a-2295-1725
GebFra Science
Review

Systematic Reviews on the Prevention of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Related to Maternal Obesity to Improve Evidence-Based Counselling

Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten über die Verbesserung der evidenzbasierteren Beratung zur Prävention von mütterlichen adipositasbezogenen ungünstigen Schwangerschaftsausgängen
Susann Behnam
1   Clara Angela Foundation Witten und Berlin, Witten, Germany
2   Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
3   Dr. Horst Schmidt Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN38696)
,
Birgit Arabin
1   Clara Angela Foundation Witten und Berlin, Witten, Germany
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background

Health professionals and their patients should understand the importance of evidence. In the case of gestational diabetes mellitus, which is often associated with an abnormally high body mass index, the immediate and long-term outcome of women and their offspring depends in part on advice and implementation of lifestyle changes before, during and after pregnancy.

Methods

Up to September 2023, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and WEB OF SCIENCE were used to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the prevention of gestational diabetes. The ROBIS and AMSTAR criteria were analyzed for all systematic reviews.

Results

A total of 36 systematic reviews were identified. Dietary interventions, physical activity or a combined approach all reduced adverse pregnancy outcomes such as gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension and related morbidities. Within the randomized controlled trials included in the 36 systematic reviews, the type, intensity and frequency of interventions varied widely. The primary outcomes, reporting and methodological quality of the 36 systematic reviews and meta-analyses also varied.

The meta-analysis with the highest ROBIS and AMSTAR-2 scores was selected to design an icon array based on a fact box simulating 100 patients.

Conclusions

We propose a methodology for selecting the best evidence and transforming it into a format that illustrates the benefits and harms in a way that can be understood by lay patients, even if they cannot read. This model can be applied to counselling for expectant mothers in low and high-income countries, regardless of socioeconomic status, provided that women have access to appropriately trained healthcare providers.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Bedeutung von Evidenz sollte medizinische Fachkräften und ihren Patientinnen klar sein. Bei Gestationsdiabetes mellitus, der oft mit einem ungewöhnlich hohen Body-Mass-Index assoziiert ist, hängen sowohl die direkten Schwangerschaftsausgänge als auch die Langzeitergebnisse der Frauen und Kinder teilweise von der Beratung und den Lebensstiländerungen während und nach der Schwangerschaft ab.

Methoden

Bis September 2023 wurden Recherchen in MEDLINE, CENTRAL und WEB OF SCIENCE zur Identifizierung von systematischen Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen zur Prävention von Gestationsdiabetes durchgeführt. Alle systematischen Übersichtsarbeiten wurden anhand der ROBIS- und AMSTAR-Kriterien analysiert.

Ergebnisse

Es wurden insgesamt 36 systematische Übersichtsarbeiten identifiziert. Ernährungsinterventionen, körperliche Aktivitäten oder eine Kombination beider Herangehensweisen konnten ungünstige Schwangerschaftsausgänge wie z. B. Gestationsdiabetes, schwangerschaftsinduzierte Hypertonie und die damit zusammenhängende Morbidität senken. In den randomisierten kontrollierten Studien, die in den 36 systematischen Übersichtsarbeiten eingeschlossen wurden, gab es starke Unterschiede in der Art, der Intensität und der Häufigkeit der Intervention. Die primären Endpunkte, die Berichterstattung und die methodologische Qualität der 36 systematischen Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen variierten ebenfalls stark.

Es wurde die Metaanalyse mit den höchsten ROBIS- und AMSTAR-2-Punktzahlen ausgewählt, um eine Reihe von Symbolen basierend auf einer 100 Patientinnen simulierenden Faktenbox zu entwerfen.

Schlussfolgerungen

Es wird hier eine Methode vorgeschlagen, mit der die beste Evidenz ausgewählt und in ein Format überführt werden kann, das die Vorteile und Schäden so veranschaulicht, dass sie von Patientinnen ohne medizinische Vorbildung verstanden werden können, selbst wenn diese Frauen nicht lesen können. Dieses Modell kann bei der Beratung werdender Mütter in Ländern mit niedrigem und hohem Einkommen eingesetzt werden, unabhängig vom sozioökonomischen Status der Frauen, sofern sie Zugang zu entsprechend ausgebildeten Gesundheitsdienstleistern haben.



Publication History

Received: 03 February 2024

Accepted after revision: 13 March 2024

Article published online:
13 June 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Wiener K. Identifying gestational diabetes mellitus and the effect of different diagnostic criteria. J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 21: 158-159
  • 2 Wang H, Li N, Chivese T. et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Estimation of Global and Regional Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevalence for 2021 by International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group’s Criteria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022; 183: 109050
  • 3 Ye W, Luo C, Huang J. et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2022; 377: e067946
  • 4 Metzger BE, Bybee DE, Freinkel N. et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Correlations between the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the mother and abnormal glucose tolerance during the first year postpartum. Diabetes 1985; 34 (Suppl. 2) 111-115
  • 5 Arabin B, Baschat AA. Pregnancy: An Underutilized Window of Opportunity to Improve Long-term Maternal and Infant Health-An Appeal for Continuous Family Care and Interdisciplinary Communication. Front Pediatr 2017; 5: 69
  • 6 Rasmussen KM, Abrams B, Bodnar LM. et al. Recommendations for weight gain during pregnancy in the context of the obesity epidemic. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1191-1195
  • 7 Cuckle HS. Screening for pre-eclampsia--lessons from aneuploidy screening. Placenta 2011; 32: S42-S48
  • 8 Gabbay-Benziv R, Doyle LE, Blitzer M. et al. First trimester prediction of maternal glycemic status. J Perinat Med 2015; 43: 283-289
  • 9 Gabbay-Benziv R, Oliveira N, Baschat AA. Optimal first trimester preeclampsia prediction: a comparison of multimarker algorithm, risk profiles and their sequential application. Prenat Diagn 2016; 36: 34-39
  • 10 Nanda S, Savvidou M, Syngelaki A. et al. Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 135-141
  • 11 Fleming N, Ng N, Osborne C. et al. Adolescent pregnancy outcomes in the province of Ontario: a cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35: 234-245
  • 12 Rich-Edwards JW, McElrath TF, Karumanchi SA. et al. Breathing life into the lifecourse approach: pregnancy history and cardiovascular disease in women. Hypertension 2010; 56: 331-334
  • 13 Sattar N, Greer IA. Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening?. BMJ 2002; 325: 157-160
  • 14 Ashwal E, Hadar E, Hod M. Diabetes in low-resourced countries. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 29: 91-101
  • 15 Barker DJ, Osmond C, Golding J. et al. Growth in utero, blood pressure in childhood and adult life, and mortality from cardiovascular disease. BMJ 1989; 298: 564-567
  • 16 Claesson R, Aberg A, Marsál K. Abnormal fetal growth is associated with gestational diabetes mellitus later in life: population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007; 86: 652-656
  • 17 de Rooij SR, Painter RC, Phillips DIW. et al. Impaired insulin secretion after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1897-1901
  • 18 Persson B, Pschera H, Binder C. et al. Decreased beta-cell function in women with previous small for gestational age infants. Horm Metab Res 1993; 25: 170-174
  • 19 Roseboom T, de Rooij S, Painter R. The Dutch famine and its long-term consequences for adult health. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82: 485-491
  • 20 Simmons R. Perinatal programming of obesity. Exp Gerontol 2005; 40: 863-866
  • 21 Patro Golab B, Santos S, Voerman E. et al. Influence of maternal obesity on the association between common pregnancy complications and risk of childhood obesity: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018; 2: 812-821
  • 22 Li M, Hinkle SN, Grantz KL. et al. Glycaemic status during pregnancy and longitudinal measures of fetal growth in a multi-racial US population: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020; 8: 292-300
  • 23 Keely EJ, Malcolm JC, Hadjiyannakis S. et al. Prevalence of metabolic markers of insulin resistance in offspring of gestational diabetes pregnancies. Pediatr Diabetes 2008; 9: 53-59
  • 24 Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R. et al. Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics 2005; 115: e290-e296
  • 25 Dabelea D, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ. Effect of diabetes in pregnancy on offspring: follow-up research in the Pima Indians. J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9: 83-88
  • 26 Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001; 4: 99-108
  • 27 Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. The drug facts box: providing consumers with simple tabular data on drug benefit and harm. Med Decis Making 2007; 27: 655-662
  • 28 Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Communicating data about the benefits and harms of treatment: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 87-96
  • 29 Petrova D, Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely ET. Understanding the Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening: A Model of Factors That Shape Informed Decision Making. Med Decis Making 2015; 35: 847-858
  • 30 Sullivan HW, O’Donoghue AC, Aikin KJ. Communicating Benefit and Risk Information in Direct-to-Consumer Print Advertisements: A Randomized Study. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2015; 49: 493-502
  • 31 Gigerenzer G. Full disclosure about cancer screening. BMJ 2016; 352: h6967
  • 32 McDowell M, Rebitschek FG, Gigerenzer G. et al. A simple tool for communicating the benefits and harms of health interventions: A guide for creating a fact box. MDM Policy Pract 2016; 1: 2381468316665365
  • 33 Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA. et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-72
  • 34 Lamminpää R, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Schwab U. A systematic review of dietary interventions for gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes in overweight and obese pregnant women. Eur J Nutr 2018; 57: 1721-1736
  • 35 O’Brien CM, Grivell RM, Dodd JM. Systematic review of antenatal dietary and lifestyle interventions in women with a normal body mass index. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016; 95: 259-269
  • 36 Rogozinska E, Chamillard M, Hitman GA. et al. Nutritional manipulation for the primary prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomised studies. PloS One 2015; 10: e0115526
  • 37 Tanentsapf I, Heitmann BL, Adegboye AR. Systematic review of clinical trials on dietary interventions to prevent excessive weight gain during pregnancy among normal weight, overweight and obese women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011; 11: 81
  • 38 Tieu J, Shepherd E, Middleton P. et al. Dietary advice interventions in pregnancy for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (01) CD006674
  • 39 Zhang R, Han S, Chen GC. et al. Effects of low-glycemic-index diets in pregnancy on maternal and newborn outcomes in pregnant women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Nutr 2018; 57: 167-177
  • 40 Zhu Y, Zheng Q, Huang L. et al. The effects of plant-based dietary patterns on the risk of developing gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18: e0291732
  • 41 Zhang Y, Xia M, Weng S. et al. Effect of Mediterranean diet for pregnant women: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35: 4824-4829
  • 42 da Silva SG, Ricardo LI, Evenson KR. et al. Leisure-Time Physical Activity in Pregnancy and Maternal-Child Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies. Sports Med 2017; 47: 295-317
  • 43 Han S, Middleton P, Crowther CA. Exercise for pregnant women for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (07) CD009021
  • 44 Sanabria-Martínez G, García-Hermoso A, Poyatos-León R. et al. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions on preventing gestational diabetes mellitus and excessive maternal weight gain: a meta-analysis. BJOG 2015; 122: 1167-1174
  • 45 Zheng J, Wang H, Ren M. Influence of exercise intervention on gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endocrinol Invest 2017; 40: 1027-1033
  • 46 Davenport MH, Ruchat S-M, Poitras VJ. et al. Prenatal exercise for the prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 1367-1375
  • 47 Bennett G, King N, Redfern K. et al. Supervised physical activity and the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2023; 36: 2155043
  • 48 Nasiri-Amiri F, Sepidarkish M, Shirvani MA. et al. The effect of exercise on the prevention of gestational diabetes in obese and overweight pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2019; 11: 72
  • 49 Paulsen CP, Bandak E, Edemann-Callesen H. et al. The Effects of Exercise during Pregnancy on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, Preeclampsia, and Spontaneous Abortion among Healthy Women-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20: 6069
  • 50 Muhammad HFL, Pramono A, Rahman MN. The safety and efficacy of supervised exercise on pregnant women with overweight/obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Obes 2021; 11: e12428
  • 51 Pascual-Morena C, Cavero-Redondo I, Álvarez-Bueno C. et al. Exercise versus Metformin to Improve Pregnancy Outcomes among Overweight Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 3490
  • 52 Zhang J, Wang HP, Wang XX. Effects of aerobic exercise performed during pregnancy on hypertension and gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2023; 63: 852-863
  • 53 Díaz-Burrueco JR, Cano-Ibáñez N, Martín-Peláez S. et al. Effects on the maternal-fetal health outcomes of various physical activity types in healthy pregnant women. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 262: 203-215
  • 54 Makaruk B, Galczak-Kondraciuk A, Forczek W. et al. The Effectiveness of Regular Exercise Programs in the Prevention of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus-A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2019; 74: 303-312
  • 55 Du MC, Ouyang YQ, Nie XF. et al. Effects of physical exercise during pregnancy on maternal and infant outcomes in overweight and obese pregnant women: A meta-analysis. Birth 2019; 46: 211-221
  • 56 Ming WK, Ding W, Zhang CJP. et al. The effect of exercise during pregnancy on gestational diabetes mellitus in normal-weight women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18: 440
  • 57 Kuang J, Sun S, Ke F. The effects of exercise intervention on complications and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102: e34804
  • 58 Bennett CJ, Walker RE, Blumfield ML. et al. Interventions designed to reduce excessive gestational weight gain can reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018; 141: 69-79
  • 59 Oteng-Ntim E, Varma R, Croker H. et al. Lifestyle interventions for overweight and obese pregnant women to improve pregnancy outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2012; 10: 47
  • 60 Shepherd E, Gomersall JC, Tieu J. et al. Combined diet and exercise interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (11) CD010443
  • 61 Song C, Li J, Leng J. et al. Lifestyle intervention can reduce the risk of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 2016; 17: 960-969
  • 62 Thangaratinam S, Rogozinska E, Jolly K. et al. Effects of interventions in pregnancy on maternal weight and obstetric outcomes: meta-analysis of randomised evidence. BMJ 2012; 344: e2088
  • 63 International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group. Effect of diet and physical activity based interventions in pregnancy on gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes: meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials. BMJ 2017; 358: j3119
  • 64 Tang Q, Zhong Y, Xu C. et al. Effectiveness of five interventions used for prevention of gestational diabetes: A network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101: e29126
  • 65 Teede HJ, Bailey C, Moran LJ. et al. Association of Antenatal Diet and Physical Activity-Based Interventions With Gestational Weight Gain and Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2022; 182: 106-114
  • 66 Guo XY, Shu J, Fu XH. et al. Improving the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for gestational diabetes prevention: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. BJOG 2019; 126: 311-320
  • 67 Behnam S, Timmesfeld N, Arabin B. Lifestyle Interventions to Improve Pregnancy Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Specified Meta-Analyses. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82: 1249-1264
  • 68 Lim S, Takele WW, Vesco KK. et al. Participant characteristics in the prevention of gestational diabetes as evidence for precision medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Commun Med (Lond) 2023; 3: 137
  • 69 Wu S, Jin J, Hu KL. et al. Prevention of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Gestational Weight Gain Restriction in Overweight/Obese Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2022; 14: 2383
  • 70 Zhang C, Ning Y. Effect of dietary and lifestyle factors on the risk of gestational diabetes: review of epidemiologic evidence. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94 (Suppl. 6) 1975S-1979S
  • 71 Bao W, Tobias DK, Hu FB. et al. Pre-pregnancy potato consumption and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2016; 352: h6898
  • 72 Bowers K, Tobias DK, Yeung E. et al. A prospective study of prepregnancy dietary fat intake and risk of gestational diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95: 446-453
  • 73 Zhang C, Liu S, Solomon CG. et al. Dietary fiber intake, dietary glycemic load, and the risk for gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2223-2230
  • 74 Bao W, Bowers K, Tobias DK. et al. Prepregnancy dietary protein intake, major dietary protein sources, and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 2001-2008
  • 75 Tobias DK, Zhang C, Chavarro J. et al. Prepregnancy adherence to dietary patterns and lower risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 96: 289-295
  • 76 Owe KM, Nystad W, Bø K. Association between regular exercise and excessive newborn birth weight. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 770-776
  • 77 Hegaard HK, Petersson K, Hedegaard M. et al. Sports and leisure-time physical activity in pregnancy and birth weight: a population-based study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20: e96-102
  • 78 Evenson KR, Wen F. Prevalence and correlates of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior among US pregnant women. Prev Med 2011; 53: 39-43
  • 79 Domingues MR, Barros AJD. Leisure-time physical activity during pregnancy in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort Study. Rev Saude Publica 2007; 41: 173-180
  • 80 Elmaraezy A, Abushouk AI, Emara A. et al. Effect of metformin on maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnant obese non-diabetic women: A meta-analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed 2017; 15: 461-470
  • 81 Crawford TJ, Crowther CA, Alsweiler J. et al. Antenatal dietary supplementation with myo-inositol in women during pregnancy for preventing gestational diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (12) CD011507
  • 82 Barrett HL, Dekker Nitert M, Conwell LS. et al. Probiotics for preventing gestational diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (02) CD009951
  • 83 Kalafat E, Sukur YE, Abdi A. et al. Metformin for prevention of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in women with gestational diabetes or obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018; 52: 706-714
  • 84 Arabin B. Irresponsible and responsible resource management in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 43: 87-106
  • 85 Arabin B, Baschat AA. Pregnancy: An Underutilized Window of Opportunity to Improve Long-term Maternal and Infant Health-An Appeal for Continuous Family Care and Interdisciplinary Communication. Front Pediatr 2017; 5: 69
  • 86 Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA 2012; 307: 1513-1516
  • 87 Shennan AH, Suff N. Inconclusive evidence for optimal preterm birth prevention. BJOG 2019; 126: 568
  • 88 Prior M, Hibberd R, Asemota N. et al. Inadvertent P-hacking among trials and systematic reviews of the effect of progestogens in pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2017; 124: 1008-1015
  • 89 Higgins J, Altman D, Sterne J. Chapter 8: Assessing Risk of Bias in included Studies. In: Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS. Cochrane Handbook for systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2011
  • 90 Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. The drug facts box: providing consumers with simple tabular data on drug benefit and harm. Med Decis Making 2007; 27: 655-662
  • 91 McDowell M, Rebitschek FG, Gigerenzer G. et al. A Simple Tool for Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Health Interventions: A Guide for Creating a Fact Box. MDM Policy Pract 2016; 1: 2381468316665365
  • 92 Rogozinska E, D’Amico MI, Khan KS. et al. Development of composite outcomes for individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis on the effects of diet and lifestyle in pregnancy: a Delphi survey. BJOG 2016; 123: 190-198
  • 93 Sun Y, Shen Z, Zhan Y. et al. Effects of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on maternal and infant complications. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20: 390
  • 94 Kumaran K, Birken C, Baillargeon JP. et al. An intergenerational life-course approach to address early childhood obesity and adiposity: the Healthy Life Trajectories Initiative (HeLTI). Lancet Glob Health 2023; 11 (Suppl. 1) S15
  • 95 Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008; 27: 759-769