Interdisziplinäre Therapie eines erwachsenen Patienten mit Klasse II/2 und retralem Zwangsbiss

Zusammenfassung

Die craniomandibuläre Dysfunktion ist die häufigste chronische Schmerzerkrankung im Kiefer- Gesichtsbereich. Die Therapie erfordert einen interdisziplinären Ansatz. Diese Fallvorstellung zeigt das Behandlungskonzept eines retralen Zwangsbisses bei einer Klasse II/2 mit Herbst-, Teil-Multibracketapparatur und Alignern.

Abstract

Temporomandibular disorder is the most common chronic orofacial pain condition in the population. The therapy requires an interdisciplinary treatment. This case report presents the treatment of a posterior forced bite of a patient with class II/2 malocclusion with Herbst-, partial multibracket appliance and aligners.

Schlüsselworte

Herbst- Apparatur - Aligner - Invisalign - Klasse II Malokklusion

Keywords

Herbst appliance - aligner - Invisalign - Class-II-Malocclusion

Publication History

Article published online:
19 June 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Valesan LF, Da-Cas CD, Réus JC. et al. Prevalence of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2021; 25: 441-53
• 2 Alogaibi YA, Murshid ZA, Alsulimani FF. et al. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among young adults in Jeddah city. J Orthod Sci 2020; 9: 3
• 3 Akbari M, Lankarani KB, Honarvar B. et al. Prevalence of malocclusion among Iranian children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2016; 13: 387-95
• 4 McNamara JA. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981; 51: 177-202
• 5 Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982; 82: 104-113
• 6 LeCornu M, Cevidanes LH, Zhu H. et al. Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 818-830
• 7 Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1989; 95: 138-147
• 8 Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E. et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research Applications: recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2014; 28: 6-27
• 9 Slade GD, Greenspan JD, Fillingim RB. et al. Overlap of Five Chronic Pain Conditions: Temporomandibular Disorders, Headache, Back Pain, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and Fibromyalgia. J Oral Facial Pain Headache 2020; 34: s15-s28
• 10 Henrikson T. Temporomandibular disorders and mandibular function in relation to Class II malocclusion and orthodontic treatment. A controlled, prospective and longitudinal study. Swed Dent J Suppl 1999; 134: 1-144
• 11 Bindayel NA. Occurrence of Malocclusion in Patients with Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. J Contemp Dent Pract 2018; 19: 477-82
• 12 Uetanabaro LC, Gerber JT, Dos Santos KM. et al. Prevalence and associated factors of myofascial pain in orthognathic patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 27: 25-31
• 13 Dinsdale A, Costin B, Dharamdasani S. et al. What conservative interventions improve bite function in those with temporomandibular disorders? A systematic review using self-reported and physical measures. J Oral Rehabil 2022; 49: 456-75
• 14 Ruf S, Pancherz H. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 352-360
• 15 Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 140-152 quiz
• 16 Clements KM, Bollen A-M, Huang G. et al. Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 2: dental improvements. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2003; 124: 502-508
• 17 Bollen A-M, Huang G, King G. et al. Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 1: ability to complete treatment. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2003; 124: 496-501
• 18 Nedwed V, Miethke R-R. Motivation, acceptance and problems of Invisalign^® patients. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 2005; 66: 162-173
• 19 Miller KB, McGorray SP, Womack R. et al A comparison of treatment impacts between Invisalign aligner and fixed appliance therapy during the first week of treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2007; 131 302 e1-e9