Performance of a single-use gastroscope for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Prospective evaluation

Abstract

Background and study aims Reprocessing reusable endoscopes is challenging due to their non-sterilizable nature. Disinfection has been shown to have a significant risk of failure with serious consequences. Single-use endoscopes can eliminate contamination risk and reduce workflow delays caused by reprocessing. This study evaluated the clinical performance of single-use gastroscopes in patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

Patients and methods In this case series, 60 patients underwent EGD using single-use gastroscopes, with 34 procedures in the endoscopy department and 26 in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was successful completion of the intended EGD objective. Furthermore, certified endoscopists assessed device performance on a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-"much worse" to 5-"much better"), considering their experience with a reusable gastroscope.

Results Successful completion of EGDs using only the single-use gastroscope was achieved in 58 of 60 cases (96.7%). In two cases, crossover to an ultra-slim endoscope was necessary to either reach the esophageal stenosis or to transverse the stenosis. Overall satisfaction was rated as comparable to reusable scopes in 51 of 56 cases (91.1%) and inferior in five cases (8.9%). The lower weight of the single-use gastroscope was rated as superior in 42 of 60 cases (70.0%). Drawbacks included reduced image quality (23 of 45 cases; 51.1%). Feedback included the absence of a freeze button, lens cleaning issues, and small image size.

Conclusions Single-use gastroscopes exhibited a high EGD completion rate and effectiveness for various indications. Further research should focus on evaluating the implementation of single-use gastroscopes in a comprehensive context, considering clinical effectiveness, costs, and environmental impact.

Keywords

Endoscopy Upper GI Tract - Hygiene - Quality and logistical aspects - Performance and complications

Publication History

Received: 31 October 2023

Accepted after revision: 12 February 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 February 2024

Article published online:
18 March 2024

• References

• 1 Early DS, Ben-Menachem T. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1127-1131
• 2 Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC. et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: Update 2018. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 254-272 e211 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.063. (PMID: 30315778)
• 3 Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. et al. Adverse events of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 707-718
• 4 Ofstead CL, Buro BL, Hopkins KM. et al. Duodenoscope-associated infection prevention: A call for evidence-based decision making. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E1769-E1781 DOI: 10.1055/a-1264-7173. (PMID: 33269310)
• 5 McCafferty CE, Aghajani MJ, Abi-Hanna D. et al. An update on gastrointestinal endoscopy-associated infections and their contributing factors 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1108 Medical Microbiology. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2018; 17 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-018-0289-2.
• 6 Johani K, Hu H, Santos L. et al. Determination of bacterial species present in biofilm contaminating the channels of clinical endoscopes. Infection Dis Health 2018; 23: 189-196
• 7 Muscarella LF. Use of ethylene-oxide gas sterilisation to terminate multidrug-resistant bacterial outbreaks linked to duodenoscopes. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2019; 6: e000282 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000282. (PMID: 31423318)
• 8 Werkgroep Infectie Preventie. Guideline cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization of medical devices for reuse – non-critical, semi-critical, or critical use. 2017 DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002873
• 9 Snyder GM, Wright SB, Smithey A. et al. Randomized comparison of 3 high-level disinfection and sterilization procedures for duodenoscopes. Gastroenterology 2017; 153: 1018-1025 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.052. (PMID: 28711629)
• 10 Bajolet O, Ciocan D, Vallet C. et al. Gastroscopy-associated transmission of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Hosp Infect 2013; 83: 341-343 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.016. (PMID: 23337251)
• 11 Food and Drug Administration. MAUDE Adverse Event Report: Olympus Medical Systems Corporation Olympus Evis Exera II GI videoscope gastrointestinal videoscope. MDR Report Key 2835386. 2012
• 12 Sundermann AJ, Chen J, Miller JK. et al. Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections from a contaminated gastroscope detected by whole genome sequencing surveillance. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73: e638-e642
• 13 Goyal H, Larsen S, Perisetti A. et al. Gastrointestinal endoscope contamination rates – elevators are not only to blame: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10: E840-E853 DOI: 10.1055/a-1795-8883. (PMID: 35692921)
• 14 Rodriguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H. et al. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 797-826
• 15 Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hawes R. et al. Equivalent performance of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes in a randomized trial. United European Gastroenterology J 2020; 8: 60-61
• 16 Napoléon B, Gonzalez JM, Grandval P. et al. Evaluation of the performances of a single-use duodenoscope: Prospective multi-center national study. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 215-221 DOI: 10.1111/den.13965. (PMID: 33666280)
• 17 Weusten B, Bisschops R, Dinis-Ribeiro M. et al. Diagnosis and management of Barrett esophagus: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 1124-1146 DOI: 10.1055/a-2176-2440. (PMID: 37813356)
• 18 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
• 19 Ebigbo A, Tadic V, Schlottmann J. et al. Evaluation of a single-use gastroscope in patients presenting with suspected upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a pilot feasibility study (One-Scope I). Endoscopy 2023; 55: 940-944
• 20 Banks M, Graham D, Jansen M. et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut 2019; 68: 1545-1575 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-318126. (PMID: 31278206)
• 21 Lat TI, McGraw MK, White HD. Gender differences in critical illness and critical care research. Clin Chest Med 2021; 42: 543-555 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2021.04.012. (PMID: 34353458)