CC BY 4.0 · Endoscopy 2024; 56(S 01): E215-E216
DOI: 10.1055/a-2268-5673
E-Videos

Treatment of a sessile serrated adenoma/polyp deeply invading the appendiceal orifice enabled by combined adaptive traction and underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection

Elena De Cristofaro
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9318)
,
Louis-Jean Masgnaux
2   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
,
Alexandru Lupu
2   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
,
Timothée Wallenhorst
3   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
,
Jérémie Jacques
4   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
,
Jérôme Rivory
2   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
,
Mathieu Pioche
2   Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
› Author Affiliations

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of lesions that invade the appendix is technically challenging because of the difficulty of accessing the submucosa. A previous retrospective multicenter study reported a suboptimal R0 resection rate of around 80% [1]. Several tools, such as traction devices, have been developed to facilitate the procedure [2], including multipolar adaptive traction [3]. We herein report the case of a 73-year-old patient with a large dysplastic sessile serrated adenoma/polyp deeply invading the appendiceal orifice (type 3 of Toyonaga’s classification) [4], which was successfully resected using an adaptative traction device (A-TRACT 2+2) combined with underwater ESD ([Video 1]).


Quality:
Adaptive traction device combined with underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection to treat an appendicular neoplastic lesion.Video 1

After circumferential incision and trimming, the four loops of the A-TRACT 2+2 were fixed by clips to the edges of the lesion, with the appendiceal orifice situated at its center. The rubber band was fixed to the opposite wall. In this way, the dissection was performed with good submucosal exposure circumferentially around the appendiceal area. To remove the entire submucosal attachment of the cecal component, we dissected alternately on the right and on the left. Once the only part remaining was the appendiceal area, the A-TRACT 2+2 was tightened to focus the tension on the appendiceal area enough to bring out the bottom of the appendix, allowing us to cut sideways as deeply as possible ([Fig. 1]). Underwater ESD was used to optimize the submucosal exposure and go deeper into the very narrow space behind the appendix. With this combined technique, submucosal exposure was good right to the end of the procedure, allowing an R0 resection without adverse events. Histopathological analysis revealed a dysplastic sessile serrated adenoma/polyp with focal intramucosal adenocarcinoma. The defect was closed with endoscopic clips, leaving the appendiceal orifice open in order to avoid appendicitis, as described in strategies for endoscopic full-thickness resection [5].

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Schematic representation of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the ATRACT 2+2 adaptative traction device. a Circumferential incision and trimming; b ATRACT 2+2 placement with good submucosal exposure; c dissection around the lesion; d tightening the ATRACT 2+2 to pull up the bottom of the appendix and cut sideways as deeply as possible.

We hypothesize that a dedicated device of this type combined with underwater ESD could facilitate intervention for appendiceal lesions, especially those deeply invading the appendiceal orifice.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AG

Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/).

This section has its own submission website athttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos.



Publication History

Article published online:
01 March 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Figueiredo M, Yzet C, Wallenhorst T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of appendicular lesions is feasible and safe: a retrospective multicenter study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 634-638
  • 2 Masgnaux L-J, Grimaldi J, Rostain F. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of appendiceal lesions by using a novel adjustable traction device: A-TRACT-2. VideoGIE 2022; 8: 81-83
  • 3 Oung B, Rivory J, Chabrun E. et al. ESD with double clips and rubber band traction of neoplastic lesions developed in the appendiceal orifice is effective and safe. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E388-E395
  • 4 Jacob H, Toyonaga T, Ohara Y. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of cecal lesions in proximity to the appendiceal orifice. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 829-836
  • 5 Schmidbaur S, Wannhoff A, Walter B. et al. Risk of appendicitis after endoscopic full-thickness resection of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice: a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 424-428