RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2259-0662
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Active Cancer Receiving Rivaroxaban or Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin: The OSCAR-UK Study
Funding The study was funded by Bayer.
Abstract
Background In most patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CT), essentially those not at high risk of bleeding, guidelines recommend treatment with direct oral anticoagulants as an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). Population-based studies comparing these therapies are scarce.
Objectives To compare the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrences, significant bleeding, and all-cause mortality in patients with CT receiving rivaroxaban or LMWHs.
Patients/Methods Using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink data from 2013 to 2020, we generated a cohort of patients with first CT treated initially with either rivaroxaban or LMWH. Patients were observed 12 months for VTE recurrences, significant bleeds (major bleeds or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding requiring hospitalization), and all-cause mortality. Overlap weighted sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHRs) compared rivaroxaban with LMWH in an intention-to-treat analysis.
Results The cohort consisted of 2,259 patients with first CT, 314 receiving rivaroxaban, and 1,945 LMWH, mean age 72.4 and 66.9 years, respectively. In the 12-month observational period, 184 person-years following rivaroxaban and 1,057 following LMWH, 10 and 66 incident recurrent VTE events, 20 and 102 significant bleeds, and 10 and 133 deaths were observed in rivaroxaban and LMWH users, respectively. The weighted SHR at 12 months for VTE recurrences in rivaroxaban compared with LMWH were 0.80 (0.37–1.73); for significant bleeds 1.01 (0.57–1.81); and for all-cause mortality 0.49 (0.23–1.06).
Conclusion Patients with CT, not at high risk of bleeding, treated with either rivaroxaban or LMWH have comparable effectiveness and safety outcomes. This supports the recommendation that rivaroxaban is a reasonable alternative to LMWH for the treatment of CT.
Note
Trial registration number: NCT05112666
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 07. Juli 2023
Angenommen: 08. Dezember 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
01. Februar 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
08. April 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Prandoni P, Lensing AWA, Piccioli A. et al. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis. Blood 2002; 100 (10) 3484-3488
- 2 Cohen AT, Katholing A, Rietbrock S, Bamber L, Martinez C. Epidemiology of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer. A population-based cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117 (01) 57-65
- 3 Weitz JI, Haas S, Ageno W. et al; GARFIELD-VTE investigators. Cancer associated thrombosis in everyday practice: perspectives from GARFIELD-VTE. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2020; 50 (02) 267-277
- 4 Lyman GH, Carrier M, Ay C. et al. American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer. Blood Adv 2021; 5 (04) 927-974
- 5 Cuker A, Tseng EK, Nieuwlaat R. et al. American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19. Blood Adv 2021; 5 (03) 872-888
- 6 Khorana AA, Noble S, Lee AYY. et al. Role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2018; 16 (09) 1891-1894
- 7 Giustozzi M, Agnelli G, Del Toro-Cervera J. et al. Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism associated with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2020; 120 (07) 1128-1136
- 8 Mahé I, Plaisance L, Chapelle C. et al. Long-term treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) beyond 6 months in the medical practice: USCAT, a 432-patient retrospective non-interventional study. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12 (08) 12
- 9 Sakamoto J, Yamashita Y, Morimoto T. et al; COMMAND VTE Registry Investigators. Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the real world - From the COMMAND VTE registry. Circ J 2019; 83 (11) 2271-2281
- 10 Coleman C, Caroti KS, Abdelgawwad K. et al. Patient characteristics and temporal changes in anticoagulation treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with cancer-associated thrombosis: an Oscar-US Analysis. Blood 2021; 138 (01) 2132
- 11 Martinez C, Cohen AT, Bamber L, Rietbrock S. Epidemiology of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism: a population-based cohort study in patients without active cancer. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112 (02) 255-263
- 12 Schulman S, Kearon C. Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3 (04) 692-694
- 13 Bayer AG. A study to gather information about rivaroxaban in patients in the United Kingdom who have cancer and thrombosis (OSCAR-UK). 2021 . Accessed February 9, 2024 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05112666
- 14 Martinez C, Katholing A, Wallenhorst C, Cohen AT. Prediction of significant bleeding during vitamin K antagonist treatment for venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Br J Haematol 2020; 189 (03) 524-533
- 15 Li F, Thomas LE, Li F. Addressing extreme propensity scores via the overlap weights. Am J Epidemiol 2019; 188 (01) 250-257
- 16 Thomas LE, Li F, Pencina MJ. Overlap weighting: a propensity score method that mimics attributes of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 323 (23) 2417-2418
- 17 Schoenfeld D. Partial residuals for the proportional hazards model. Biometrika 1982; 69: 51-55
- 18 Coleman CI, Caroti KS, Abdelgawwad K. et al. Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxban and low molecular-weight heparin in cancer-assocaited venous thromboembolism. JACC Cardiooncol 2023; 5 (02) 189-200
- 19 Cominacini M, Suardi S, Ferrari G. et al. DOAC in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a retrospective cohort study beyond the guidelines. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149 (09) 5773-5779
- 20 Michalopoulou H, Polyzos D, Thomopoulos C. et al. Net clinical benefit of DOACs vs. usual anticoagulation treatment in venous thromboembolism and active cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2023; 55 (01) 92-101
- 21 Agnelli G, Becattini C, Meyer G. et al; Caravaggio Investigators. Apixaban for the treatment of venous thromboembolism associated with cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 382 (17) 1599-1607
- 22 Raskob GE, van Es N, Verhamme P. et al; Hokusai VTE Cancer Investigators. Edoxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2018; 378 (07) 615-624
- 23 Young AM, Marshall A, Thirlwall J. et al. Comparison of an oral factor Xa inhibitor with low molecular weight heparin in patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism: results of a randomized trial (SELECT-D). J Clin Oncol 2018; 36 (20) 2017-2023
- 24 Bayer AG. A study to gather information about rivaroxaban in patients in Sweden with cancer who also have thrombosis (OSCAR-SE). Accessed December 17, 2021 at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05150938?term=oscar-se&draw=2&rank=1