Download PDF
Nephrologie aktuell 2024; 28(05): 204-212
DOI: 10.1055/a-2259-0642
Schwerpunkt
Dialyse

Nierenersatztherapie auf Intensivstation

Therapiestandard 2024
Julian-Wolfram Herrmann
1   Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
,
Alexander Reshetnik
1   Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Bei intensivstationär behandelten Patient*innen kommt es regelmäßig zu akuten Nierenfunktionseinschränkungen (AKI), die oft auch den Einsatz apparativer Nierenersatzverfahren nötig machen. Der vorliegende Artikel soll ein verständliches und umfassendes Kompendium des aktuellen Therapiestandards für Nierenersatzverfahren im intensivstationären Kontext mit der Erläuterung der jeweiligen Evidenz darstellen: So werden die verschiedenen verfügbaren Modalitäten (kontinuierliche versus intermittierende Hämodialyseverfahren sowie Peritonealdialyse) vorgestellt und ihre jeweiligen Vor- und Nachteile diskutiert. Dabei wird auch auf die richtigen Bedingungen für eine etwaige Umstellung von kontinuierlichen auf diskontinuierliche Verfahren eingegangen und der damit in Zusammenhang stehenden Problematik der hämodynamischen Instabilität unter einer Nierenersatztherapie. Weiterhin wird die viel diskutierte Frage nach dem richtigen Zeitpunkt des Beginns von Nierenersatzverfahren im Licht der vorhandenen Evidenz kritisch beleuchtet, genauso wie die Frage nach den Voraussetzungen für eine erfolgreiche Beendigung der Nierenersatztherapie. Verschiedene Antikoagulationsstrategien werden vorgestellt, mit besonderem Augenmerk auf die regionale Antikoagulation mit Zitrat, die mittlerweile die bevorzugte Option insbesondere für kontinuierliche Verfahren darstellt. Ebenso wird auf die Bestimmung der adäquaten Dosen je nach Modalität für den/die einzelne/n Patient*in eingegangen. Auch den spezifischen Aspekten von chronischen Dialysepatient*innen auf Intensivstation wird Rechnung getragen.



Publication History

Article published online:
25 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R. et al Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intensive Care Med 2015; 41: 1411-1423
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 KDIGO Clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl 2012; 02: 1-138
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract 2012; 120: c179-c184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bagshaw SM, Wald R, Adhikari NKJ. et al Timing of initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 240-251
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F. et al Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 122-133
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Barbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A. et al Timing of renal-replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury and sepsis. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 1431-1442
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C. et al Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 315: 2190-2199
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gaudry S, Hajage D, Martin-Lefevre L. et al Comparison of two delayed strategies for renal replacement therapy initiation for severe acute kidney injury (AKIKI 2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2021; 397: 1293-1300
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Koyner JL, Davison DL, Brasha-Mitchell E. et al Furosemide stress test and biomarkers for the prediction of AKI severity. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015; 26: 2023-2031
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Lumlertgul N, Peerapornratana S, Trakarnvanich T. et al Early versus standard initiation of renal replacement therapy in furosemide stress test non-responsive acute kidney injury patients (the FST trial). Crit Care 2018; 22: 101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Nash DM, Przech S, Wald R. et al Systematic review and meta-analysis of renal replacement therapy modalities for acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2017; 41: 138-144
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Yildiz AB, Vehbi S, Covic A. et al An update review on hemodynamic instability in renal replacement therapy patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55: 929-942
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Van Bommel E. et al Acute dialytic support for the critically ill: intermittent hemodialysis versus continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration. Am J Nephrol 1995; 15: 192-200
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Kruczynski K, Irvine-Bird K, Toffelmire EB. et al A comparison of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration and intermittent hemodialysis in acute renal failure patients in the intensive care unit. ASAIO J 1993; 39: M778-M781
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Rabindranath K, Adams J, Macleod AM. et al Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 03: CD003773
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Arieff AI, Massry SG, Barrientos A. et al Brain water and electrolyte metabolism in uremia: effects of slow and rapid hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1973; 04: 177-187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Truche AS, Darmon M, Bailly S. et al Continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in intensive care patients: impact on mortality and renal recovery. Intensive Care Med 2016; 42: 1408-1417
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Friedrich JO, Wald R, Bagshaw SM. et al Hemofiltration compared to hemodialysis for acute kidney injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2012; 16: R146
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wald R, Beaubien-Souligny W, Chanchlani R. et al Delivering optimal renal replacement therapy to critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48: 1368-1381
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Al Sahlawi M, Ponce D, Charytan DM. et al Peritoneal dialysis in critically ill patients: time for a critical reevaluation?. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 18: 512-520
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Liu L, Zhang L, Liu GJ. et al Peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 12: CD011457
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Fisher R, Clarke J, Al-Arfi K. et al Provision of acute renal replacement therapy, using three separate modalities, in critically ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. An after action review from a UK tertiary critical care centre. J Crit Care 2021; 62: 190-196
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Zhou X, Dong P, Pan J. et al Renal replacement therapy modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury – A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Crit Care 2021; 64: 82-90
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O’Connor TZ. et al Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 7-20
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L. et al Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1627-1638
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Vesconi S, Cruz DN, Fumagalli R. et al Delivered dose of renal replacement therapy and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2009; 13: R57
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Al Rifai A, Sukul N, Wonnacott R. et al Safety of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts for continuous renal replacement therapy: the Michigan experience. Hemodial Int 2018; 22: 50-55
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Bitker L, Bayle F, Yonis H. et al Prevalence and risk factors of hypotension associated with preload-dependence during intermittent hemodialysis in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2016; 20: 44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Akhoundi A, Singh B, Vela M. et al Incidence of adverse events during continuous renal replacement therapy. Blood Purif 2015; 39: 333-339
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Douvris A, Zeid K, Hiremath S. et al Mechanisms for hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45: 1333-1346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Douvris A, Malhi G, Hiremath S. et al Interventions to prevent hemodynamic instability during renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 2018; 22: 41
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Zarbock A, Küllmar M, Kindgen-Milles D. et al Effect of regional citrate anticoagulation vs systemic heparin anticoagulation during continuous kidney replacement therapy on dialysis filter life span and mortality among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 324: 1629-1639
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Zarbock A, Küllmar M, Kindgen-Milles D. et al Effect of regional citrate anticoagulation vs systemic heparin anticoagulation during continuous kidney replacement therapy on dialysis filter life span and mortality among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 324: 1629-1639
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Morgera S, Schneider M, Slowinski T. et al A safe citrate anticoagulation protocol with variable treatment efficacy and excellent control of the acid-base status. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2018-2024
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Hetzel GR, Taskaya G, Sucker C. et al Citrate plasma levels in patients under regional anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48: 806-811
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Durão MS, Monte JC, Batista MC. et al The use of regional citrate anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 3024-3029
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Ostermann M, Bellomo R, Burdmann EA. et al Controversies in acute kidney injury: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference. Kidney Int 2020; 98: 294-309
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Baeg SI, Jeon J, Yoo H. et al A scoring model with simple clinical parameters to predict successful discontinuation of continuous renal replacement therapy. Blood Purif 2021; 50: 779-789
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Liu C, Peng Z, Dong Y. et al Predicting successful continuous renal replacement therapy liberation in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. J Crit Care 2021; 66: 6-13
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar