Gender authorship in major American and European gastroenterology journals: the gap is still unfilled

Abstract

Background The gender gap in the authorship of scientific research may affect career advancement. Our aim was to assess the potential gender gap in gastrointestinal (GI) journals.

Methods A systematic review was performed of the GI literature and ongoing research in the period 2020–2022. A total 10 GI journals and ongoing research on clinicaltrials.gov were selected for review. The gender gap in first and senior authorship was evaluated for each article and ongoing research project. Associations between the gender gap and possible predictors were measured and results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95%CI.

Results The number of first female authors (FFAs) and senior female authors (SFAs) in published articles were 1408/4207 (33.5%) and 911/4207 (21.7%), respectively. There were 781/2654 (29.4%) female principal investigators (PI)s for the ongoing research. On comparison of non-endoscopic vs. endoscopic topics, the latter were associated with the gender gap (hepatology, OR 2.15 [95%CI 1.83–2.55]; inflammatory bowel disease, OR 2.12 [95%CI 1.60–2.45]; upper and lower GI, OR 1.31 [95%CI 1.18–1.73]); as well as the type of article (original article vs. editorial, OR 1.92 [95%CI 1.58–2.33]). The type of research was also associated with the gender gap (clinical vs. preclinical studies, OR 0.88 [95%CI 0.66–0.91]).

Conclusion Our results demonstrated a correlation between the gender gap and the design and topic of the research. Future strategies for improving equity in career development in GI endoscopy should focus on closing the gender gap in equity of authorship.

• References

• 1 Joseph MM, Ahasic AM, Clark J, Templeton K. State of women in medicine: history, challenges, and the benefits of a diverse workforce. Pediatrics 2021; 148 (02) e2021051440C
• 2 Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM. The state of women in academic medicine 2018–2019: exploring pathways to equity . Zugriff am 15. Januar 2024 unter: https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/data/2018–2019-state-women-academic-medicine-exploring-pathways-equity
• 3 Oliveira DFM, Ma Y, Woodruff TK, Uzzi B. Comparison of National Institutes of Health grant amounts to first-time male and female principal investigators. JAMA 2019; 321: 898-900
• 4 Nonnemaker LN. Women physicians in academic medicine—new insights from cohort studies. NEJM 2000; 342: 399-405
• 5 Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, Nattinger AB. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine: glass ceiling or sticky floor?. JAMA 1995; 273: 1022-1025
• 6 Madden C, O'Malley R, O'Connor P. et al. Gender in authorship and editorship in medical education journals: A bibliometric review. Med Educ 2021; 55: 678-688
• 7 Jagsi R, Tarbell NJ, Henault LE. et al. The representation of women on the editorial boards of major medical journals: a 35-year perspective. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 544-548
• 8 Thomas EG, Jayabalasingham B, Collins T. et al. Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2: e1913682
• 9 Long MT, Leszczynski A, Thompson KD. et al. Female authorship in major academic gastroenterology journals: a look over 20 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1440-1447.e3
• 10 OECD. Share of female doctors, 2000 and 2019 (or nearest year). In: Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2021. Zugriff am 15. Januar 2024 unter: https://doi.org/10.1787/9cdd89d3-en
• 11 Rimmer A. Women in gastroenterology: five minutes with … Helen Fidler. BMJ 2019; 364: l697
• 12 Matharoo MK, Sethi A, Charabaty A. Towards meaningful change: the future of gastroenterology belongs to women, diversity, equity, and inclusion. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6: 518-520