CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(02): E282-E290
DOI: 10.1055/a-2251-3285
Original article

The professional background of a referring physician predicts the diagnostic yield of small bowel capsule endoscopy in suspected small bowel bleeding

1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
Costantino Sgamato
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
Alba Rocco
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
Pietro Coccoli
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
Durante Donnarumma
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
Stefano Andrea Marchitto
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
Sofia Cinque
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
Pietro Palmieri
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
,
Gerardo Nardone
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9307)
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims The diagnostic yield of small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) in suspected small bowel bleeding (SSBB) is highly variable. Different reimbursement systems and equipment costs also limit SBCE use in clinical practice. Thus, minimizing non-diagnostic procedures is advisable. This study aimed to assess the SBCE diagnostic yield and identify factors predicting diagnostic findings in a cohort of patients with SSBB.

Patients and methods In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed the medical records of patients who consecutively underwent SBCE for SSBB over 9 years. By logistic regression, we identified covariates predicting diagnostic findings at SBCE. Finally, we performed a post-hoc cost analysis based on previous gastroenterologist or endoscopist consultations versus direct SBCE ordering by other specialists.

Results The final analysis included 584 patients. Most SBCEs were ordered by a gastroenterologist or endoscopist (74%). The number of SBCEs without any finding was significantly lower in the gastroenterologist/endoscopist group P<0.001). The SBCE diagnostic yield ordered by a gastroenterologist or endoscopist was significantly higher than that by other specialists (63% vs 52%, odds ratio [OR] 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–2.26, P=0.019). At multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.2–2.4, P=0.005), anemia (OR 4.9, 95%CI 1.9–12, P=0.001), small bowel transit time (OR 1, 95%CI 1–1.02, P=0.039), and referring physician (OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.1–2.7, P=0.003) independently predicted diagnostic findings. Implementing prior gastroenterologist or endoscopist referral vs direct SBCE ordering would reduce medical expenditures by 16%.

Conclusions The professional background of referring physicians significantly improves the diagnostic yield of SBCE and contributes to controlling public health costs.



Publication History

Received: 22 September 2023

Accepted after revision: 22 December 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
22 January 2024

Article published online:
28 February 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Hara AK, Leighton JA, Sharma VK. et al. Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT. Radiology 2004; 230: 260-265
  • 2 Leusse A de, Vahedi K, Edery J. et al. Capsule endoscopy or push enteroscopy for first-line exploration of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding?. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 855-862 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.002. (PMID: 17324401)
  • 3 Saperas E, Dot J, Videla S. et al. Capsule endoscopy versus computed tomographic or standard angiography for the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 731-737 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01058.x. (PMID: 17397406)
  • 4 Pasha SF, Leighton JA, Das A. et al. Double-Balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy have comparable diagnostic yield in small-bowel disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 671-676
  • 5 Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Despott EJ. et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2022. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 58-95 DOI: 10.1055/a-1973-3796. (PMID: 36423618)
  • 6 Gralnek IM. Obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1424-1430 DOI: 10.20452/pamw.16253. (PMID: 35635400)
  • 7 Viazis N, Papaxoinis K, Theodoropoulos I. et al. Impact of capsule endoscopy in obscure small-bowel bleeding: Defining strict diagnostic criteria for a favorable outcome. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 717-722 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.049. (PMID: 16246686)
  • 8 Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C. et al. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 280-286 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.031. (PMID: 20152309)
  • 9 Cortegoso Valdivia P, Skonieczna-Żydecka K, Elosua A. et al. Indications, detection, completion and retention rates of capsule endoscopy in two decades of use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics 2022; 12: 1105
  • 10 Rondonotti E, Soncini M, Girelli C. et al. Cost estimation of small bowel capsule endoscopy based on “real world” data: Inpatient or outpatient procedure?. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42: 798-802 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3453-3. (PMID: 25433921)
  • 11 World Health Organisation (WHO). Hemoglobin concentrations for the diagnosis of anemia and assessment of severity, Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-NMH-NHD-MNM-11.1
  • 12 Tas F, Eralp Y, Basaran M. et al. Anemia in oncology practice: Relation to diseases and their therapies. Am J Clin Oncol Cancer Clin Trials 2002; 25: 371-379
  • 13 Rondonotti E, Spada C, Adler S. et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 423-446 DOI: 10.1055/a-0576-0566. (PMID: 29539652)
  • 14 Park SC, Keum B, Hyun JJ. et al. A novel cleansing score system for capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 875-880 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.875. (PMID: 20143467)
  • 15 Leenhardt R, Li C, Koulaouzidis A. et al. Nomenclature and semantic description of vascular lesions in small bowel capsule endoscopy: an international Delphi consensus statement. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E372-E379 DOI: 10.1055/a-0761-9742. (PMID: 30834297)
  • 16 Leenhardt R, Buisson A, Bourreille A. et al. Nomenclature and semantic descriptions of ulcerative and inflammatory lesions seen in Crohn’s disease in small bowel capsule endoscopy: An international Delphi consensus statement. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2020; 8: 99-107
  • 17 Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Gaudin JL. et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: Blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 576-584
  • 18 Cheung DY, Kim JS, Shim KN. et al. The usefulness of capsule endoscopy for small bowel tumors. Clin Endosc 2016; 49: 21-25 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.21. (PMID: 26855919)
  • 19 Lang SM, Bolin E, Hardy S. et al. Diagnostic yield of outpatient pediatric echocardiograms: impact of indications and specialty. Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 38: 162-169 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-016-1497-1. (PMID: 27826707)
  • 20 Kharazmi AA, Aslani S, Kristiansen MF. et al. Indications and diagnostic yield of small-bowel capsule endoscopy in a real-world setting. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20: 177 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01326-8. (PMID: 32513115)
  • 21 Cortegoso Valdivia P, Deding U, Bjørsum-Meyer T. et al. Inter/intra-observer agreement in video-capsule endoscopy: Are we getting it all wrong? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics 2022; 12: 2400
  • 22 Zheng Y, Hawkins L, Wolff J. et al. Detection of lesions during capsule endoscopy: physician performance is disappointing. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 554-560
  • 23 Beg S, Card T, Sidhu R. et al. The impact of reader fatigue on the accuracy of capsule endoscopy interpretation. Dig Liver Dis 2021; 53: 1028-1033 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.024. (PMID: 34016545)
  • 24 Pezzoli A, Cannizzaro R, Pennazio M. et al. Interobserver agreement in describing video capsule endoscopy findings: A multicentre prospective study. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 126-131 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.07.007. (PMID: 20817579)
  • 25 Li L, Chen C, Li Y. et al. The role of capsule endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in older individuals. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28: 1425-1430 DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000737. (PMID: 27603298)
  • 26 Urgesi R, Cianci R, Pagliari D. et al. Is capsule endoscopy appropriate for elderly patients? The influence of ageing on findings and diagnostic yield: An Italian retrospective study. Dig Liver Dis 2015; 47: 1086-1088 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.09.004. (PMID: 26514739)
  • 27 Nennstiel S, Machanek A, Delius S. et al. Predictors and characteristics of angioectasias in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding identified by video capsule endoscopy. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: 1129-1135
  • 28 Furner M, Nagel R, Pinidiyapathirage J. Video capsule endoscopy in patients with iron deficiency anaemia: experience at a regional Australian service. BMC Res Notes 2022; 15: 160
  • 29 Hamdeh S, Fathallah J, Zhang H. et al. Predictive model for positive video capsule endoscopy in iron deficiency anemia. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68: 3083-3091 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-07918-0. (PMID: 36917313)
  • 30 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E. et al. Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: Report of 100 consecutive cases. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 643-653
  • 31 Singh A, Marshall C, Chaudhuri B. et al. Timing of video capsule endoscopy relative to overt obscure GI bleeding: Implications from a retrospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 761-766
  • 32 Estevinho MM, Pinho R, Fernandes C. et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic yields of early capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy in the setting of overt GI bleeding: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 610-625.e9
  • 33 Girelli CM, Soncini M, Rondonotti E. Implications of small-bowel transit time in the detection rate of capsule endoscopy: A multivariable multicenter study of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 697-702 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.697. (PMID: 28216977)
  • 34 Rahmi G, Cholet F, Gaudric M. et al. Effect of different modalities of purgative preparation on the diagnostic yield of small bowel capsule for the exploration of suspected small bowel bleeding: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117: 327-335 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001597. (PMID: 35041627)
  • 35 Ceroni L, Lodato F, Tubertini P. et al. The Gastropack access system as a model to access gastroenterology services for gastroscopy appropriateness in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms: a comparison with the open access system. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 3343