RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/a-2239-9959
Development of a novel endoscopic hemostasis-assisted navigation AI system in the standardization of post-ESD coagulation
Authors
Abstract
Background and study aims While gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a treatment with fewer complications, delayed bleeding remains a challenge. Post-ESD coagulation (PEC) is performed to prevent delayed bleeding. Therefore, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) to detect vessels that require PEC in real time.
Materials and methods Training data were extracted from 153 gastric ESD videos with sufficient images taken with a second-look endoscopy (SLE) and annotated as follows: (1) vessels that showed bleeding during SLE without PEC; (2) vessels that did not bleed during SLE with PEC; and (3) vessels that did not bleed even without PEC. The training model was created using Google Cloud Vertex AI and a program was created to display the vessels requiring PEC in real time using a bounding box. The evaluation of this AI was verified with 12 unlearned test videos, including four cases that required additional coagulation during SLE.
Results The results of the test video validation indicated that 109 vessels on the ulcer required cauterization. Of these, 80 vessels (73.4%) were correctly determined as not requiring additional treatment. However, 25 vessels (22.9%), which did not require PEC, were overestimated. In the four videos that required additional coagulation in SLE, AI was able to detect all bleeding vessels.
Conclusions The effectiveness and safety of this endoscopic treatment-assisted AI system that identifies visible vessels requiring PEC should be confirmed in future studies.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 28. Juni 2023
Angenommen nach Revision: 04. Januar 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
08. Januar 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. April 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Iannone A. et al. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 77-85
- 2 Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R. et al. Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2020; 159: 512-520
- 3 Oda I, Gotoda T, Hamanaka H. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: technical feasibility, operation time and complications from a large consecutive series. Dig Endosc 2005; 17: 54-58
- 4 Takizawa K, Oda I, Gotoda T. et al. Routine coagulation of visible vessels may prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection – An analysis of risk factors. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 179-183
- 5 Google Cloud, Vertex AI beginner’s guides. https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/beginner/beginners-guide?hl=en
- 6 Peter S, Ayman A, Thangarajah A. et al. Intelligent real-time face-mask detection system with hardware acceleration for COVID-19 mitigation. Healthcare 2022; 10: 873
- 7 Fumiaki T, Naoto Y, Takashi A. et al. A second-look endoscopy may not reduce the bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm. BMC Gastroenterology 2014; 14: 152
- 8 Uedo N, Takeuchi Y, Ishihara R. et al. Endoscopic Doppler US for the prevention of ulcer bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a preliminary study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 444-448